Russia unleashes missile barrage on cities across Ukraine

a reply to: MidnightWatcher
No Iraq did not offer sanctuary to 9/11 masterminds, that was Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and later Pakistan. Both US and UK intelligence knew that was a lie.

And we really going to talk cease fire violations like that did not repeatedly happen after the Minsk accords??

Whether you want to accept it or not, The Ukraine invasion was a direct parallel to the invasion of Iraq by two security council members with zero evidence supporting the 2 big known and admitted lies claiming a national security threat , weapons of mass destruction and material support to 9/11 terrorists. Hopefully the end game for the primary beligerant ends up being the same.

Don't worry, we will get to do this dance again and again for pages on end until after the election. Funding for social media influence projects tend to dry up after that what with new agendas, operations managers and reps being sworn in.

You do your duty of repeating the official line, and I shall do mine to counter it. Dont forget to report me to the kill list of " Russian Propogandists

a reply to: worldstarcountry


I don't advocate killing anyone for their words, and I don't even want to know where that 'kill list' link goes

a reply to: Kenzo
Ye man, Shock and Awe is a bitch 'taint it??

Although Ullman and Wade claim that the need to "[m]inimize civilian casualties, loss of life, and collateral damage" is a "political sensitivity [which needs] to be understood up front", their doctrine of rapid dominance requires the capability to disrupt "means of communication, transportation, food production, water supply, and other aspects of infrastructure",and, in practice, "the appropriate balance of Shock and Awe must cause ... the threat and fear of action that may shut down all or part of the adversary's society or render his ability to fight useless short of complete physical destruction."[9]

Using as an example a theoretical invasion of Iraq 20 years after Operation Desert Storm, the authors claimed, "Shutting the country down would entail both the physical destruction of appropriate infrastructure and the shutdown and control of the flow of all vital information and associated commerce so rapidly as to achieve a level of national shock akin to the effect that dropping nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had on the Japanese."[10]

Reiterating the example in an interview with CBS News several months before Operation Iraqi Freedom, Ullman stated, "You're sitting in Baghdad and all of a sudden you're the general and 30 of your division headquarters have been wiped out. You also take the city down. By that I mean you get rid of their power, water. In 2, 3, 4, 5 days they are physically, emotionally and psychologically exhausted."[11]

Its a justified military doctrine to target the energy grid. Our Own military showed us that more than a few times.

a reply to: worldstarcountry


It took us less than an hour to turn off the power in iraq 30 years ago, we used specially designed weapons to ensure that the power outage was very easy to repair, and we didn't target power plants.

Or hospitals, schools, parks, or museums.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher
Yes, power plants were targeted. Over 90% of Iraqs electrical infrastructure was destroyed and sanctions prevented them from ever buying the parts to bring them back online in any serious capacity. You know all this information is publicly available. Actually you already know all of this, your just counting on folks taking your word for it who do not know any better.

While U.S. and allied leaders publicly disclaimed any intention to harm civilians or civilian objects[6], their military forces reportedly targeted, disabled, destroyed or damaged major civilian infrastructure over the whole territory of Iraq[7], including most power plants and transmissions facilities, multipurpose dams[8], refineries, food-processing plants, food-and-seed storage warehouses, flour mills, a dairy-products plant, sugar refineries, a syringe factory[9], telecommunications systems[10], irrigation facilities, municipal water-treatment and sewage plants[11], a veterinary-vaccine manufacturing facility[12], civilian vehicles, roads, railways, airports, bridges[13] and numerous industrial, commercial, educational, religious and cultural facilities[14].

a reply to: worldstarcountry


That looks like the russian version of beforeitsnews!


Take a look at their 'themes' on the bottom.

a reply to: trollz

Always doing minimal damage to non important targets. And those scenes usually look staged.

a reply to: Dutchowl

I suppose Mariupol suffered "minimal damage" and was not at all flattened?

Staged?

Oh, please.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2
That is kind of what happens when the fighters just go from building to building after one gets flattened they move to another and start over. Did you forget the city was evacuated before they rained hell, despite the Ukrainian militias there attempting to hold them as human shields.

originally posted by: MarxistDebunker
The Russian invasion of Ukraine started on 24 February 2022, the 102th anniversary of the foundation of the NSDAP (The Nazi Party).

And now, Vladimir Putin has decided to attack ten Ukrainian cities on 10 October 2022, the 77th anniversary of the official dissolution of the NSDAP ordered by the Allies.

These attacks carried out on these specific dates can’t be just mere coincidences. These are rational indications revealing us that Putin and the current Russian leadership are members of the fascist/islamist/cultist conspiracy I’m denouncing in these threads.

It’s very sad, but a tiny minority (almost certainly less than 1% of the total population) has hijacked the Russian nation and now they will use their mighty arsenal to make the European peoples kill each other.

And now on 6 June 2023, the 79th anniversary of the Normandy landings, they blow up a dam in Ukraine. The most important amphibious attack in History and a destroyed dam causing floods. The link here is water and war.

Aren’t these too many hints to WW2 or the Nazis to just keep ignoring them? Nobody finds it suspicious that no media is talking about this curious “coincidences”?

Even if you don’t believe a word of what I say, isn’t all this at least at bit fishy to you?