MRNA from corona vaccines found in breast milk.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

This isn't a personal battle for me, you've done nothing of the sort. As said previously blindly following the official data produced by Pfizer and Governments hardly constitutes any kind of insight. You're a puppet and we can all see the strings.

a reply to: Grenade

In before the:" I know you are but what am I?" asinine responses.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

86% according to data supplied by Pfizer.

I'm not falling for your trolling, some people can see through the charade.

Off you go to suckle some more from the tit of government propaganda, peddle some more positive messages about big pharma while you're at it. Historically some of the most corrupt institutions and corporations in the world. I've had just about enough of you.

You know what else is around 86%, the amount of overall advertising budget provided by the pharmaceutical companies to our largest media corporations.

To the rest of the forum, please don't feed this troll, if you want to know his opinions you can simply use google and look at the first page of articles, propped up and indexed to soothe idiots like this fool.

Finally, any thoughts on all cause mortality that your ONS figures lay out? I mean if this deadly virus wiped out the elderly and vulnerable early in the pandemic what is causing the increases in death we now see?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: AaarghZombies

This isn't a personal battle for me, you've done nothing of the sort. As said previously blindly following the official data produced by Pfizer and Governments hardly constitutes any kind of insight. You're a puppet and we can all see the strings.

The "blindly following the data" remark is rediculous. It's collected data, thats it. It's the sheeple on here following the click bait opinion pieces that are "blindly following" the fabricated lies and stories that are posted for shock purposes, pure doom porn.
Funny how you all seem to ignore the actual data from the OP now it was a shown to be a nothing burger...

a reply to: MaxxAction

He'll be off plagiarising some article from official government or big pharma sources to bolster his opinions even further. He can't fathom the idea that we don't trust these sources, hence that's why he consistently uses them.

A modest amount of originality or consideration for the oppositions opinion then i could stomach his arrogance, however there's no attempt to ameliorate his image or curtail his zealotry.

a reply to: Kurokage

You think governments and big pharma are reliable sources of information?

I prefer independent studies and a rigorous safety testing protocol before injecting new technology into myself or my kids.

This BS narrative is falling apart and yet still the fools and the blind dig their heels in.

I never commented on the OP smart-ass.

a reply to: Grenade

You think governments and big pharma are reliable sources of information?

The data shown is also from independant studies like universities and hospitals.

But you think bitchute videos and right wing religious websites are reliable sources, as thats what most of the threads posted on here end up coming from once you look for the original story which the posters use for their doom porn.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Here's my counter to the argument that SV40 doesn't cause cancer. Chew on this.

If he only want's government sources then please see the following articles, i've pulled some quotes for you directly from the US government NIH website:

Polio Vaccines contaminated with Simian Virus 40

"In 1960, it was discovered that Simian Virus 40 (SV40) contaminated up to 30% of the poliovirus vaccines in the US. This contamination arose because the vaccines were produced in monkey kidney cell cultures harboring SV40 between 1955 and 1963. During this period, approximately 90% of children and 60% of adults in the USA were inoculated for polio and possibly exposed to SV40. Many epidemiologic and molecular pathogenesis studies have been conducted in order to identify potential cancer risks since this 'natural' experiment began. Productive SV40 infection has the potential to initiate malignancy in a variety of target tissues. Epidemiological studies that investigated the relationship between SV40 infection and cancer risks have yielded mixed results. Studies can be grouped into three categories based on their exposure definition of SV40 infection: (1) use of vaccination or birth cohorts as proxy variables for infection, (2) follow-up of children of pregnant women who received polio vaccines, and (3) direct molecular detection of the virus or serologic detection of anti-SV40 antibody responses. A meta-analysis of five published studies did not support the hypothesis that SV40 exposure increases the overall risk of cancer incidence or cancer mortality. The analysis of specific cancer sites is largely inconclusive because of substantial problems that most studies have had in reliably defining exposure, defining latency effects, or dealing with confounding and other biases. A new generation of molecular epidemiologic studies is necessary to properly address these issues."

We can then use another article from the NIH to confirm SV40's link to various cancers:

SV40's role in cancer

"The polyomavirus simian virus 40 (SV40) is a known oncogenic DNA virus which induces primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and lymphomas in laboratory animals. Persuasive evidence now indicates that SV40 is causing infections in humans today and represents an emerging pathogen. A meta-analysis of molecular, pathological, and clinical data from 1,793 cancer patients indicates that there is a significant excess risk of SV40 associated with human primary brain cancers, primary bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Experimental data strongly suggest that SV40 may be functionally important in the development of some of those human malignancies. Therefore, the major types of tumors induced by SV40 in laboratory animals are the same as those human malignancies found to contain SV40 markers. The Institute of Medicine recently concluded that “the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions.” This review analyzes the accumulating data that indicate that SV40 is a pathogen which has a possible etiologic role in human malignancies. Future research directions are considered."

In countries such as the US and UK almost all children born in the 1950's were infected with this virus, since that time there's been an explosion of cancer's, most of which when studied seem to be linked to SV40.

SV40 detection in human cancers

Following a number of sporadic reports of SV40 in human cancers [reviewed in (7)] (17), DJ Bergsagel in the laboratory of Robert Garcea reported that 90% of human ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors contained SV40 DNA sequences and that some of the tumor cells expressed the SV40 Tag (39). A few years later, John Lednicky in Janet Butel’s laboratory isolated infectious SV40 from one of those cancer specimens confirming that, at least in that specific biopsy, the “SV40-like sequences” detected by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) corresponded to infectious SV40 (40).

The finding that SV40 could cause mesothelioma in hamsters (18,19) and the coincidental exponential increase in the incidence of mesothelioma in the years that followed the administration of SV40-contaminated vaccines led to tests of the hypothesis that SV40 might have contributed, together with asbestos, to the increased incidence of mesothelioma in recent decades. The results revealed that most mesotheliomas and some osteosarcomas contained SV40 DNA sequences (41,42) [reviewed in (17,22)]. These findings, together with those involving brain tumors (39), suggested that SV40 might play a causative role in certain types of human cancers and might have contributed to the massive increase in the incidence of mesothelioma in recent decades (43-45).

Mesotheliomas are rare tumors whose incidence increased exponentially in the Western world after 1960 (data in other parts of the world are not available), an increase that has been linked to the large use of asbestos during and after World War II (46-48). Asbestos causes chronic inflammation and the release of mutagenic oxygen radicals (49-51), as well as the activation of various cellular pathways that promote cell growth (52-55). Kroczynska et al. demonstrated that SV40 and asbestos are co-carcinogens in causing mesothelioma in hamsters and malignant transformation of HM cells in tissue culture (56). This study strongly suggested that SV40 infection and asbestos exposure together could have contributed to the development of human mesothelioma. A molecular epidemiological study conducted by Cristaudo et al., supported these findings (57).

a reply to: Kurokage

No, the study data is provided by the pharmaceutical companies and reviewed by these institutions. The real world data hardly matches the claims made by Pfizer, hence the goalposts are shifting constantly.

Show me a singular example of me ever using any of these sources.

a reply to: Kurokage

Thoughts on the massive rise in all cause mortality post mass vaccination?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

86% effective at doing what and for how long?

a reply to: Grenade

I never commented on the OP smart-ass.

Typical arrogant big-mouth.
So you what, You just came into the thread to post argumentative comments and not read the OP?
Was it to help the dim-witted anti-vaxers?

stevekirsch.substack.com...



rtmag.co.il...

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Grenade

I never commented on the OP smart-ass.

Typical arrogant big-mouth.
So you what, You just came into the thread to post argumentative comments and not read the OP?
Was it to help the dim-witted anti-vaxers?

Its a good thing you don't talk this way to people irl.

a reply to: Kurokage

Nothing arrogant about posting the truth.

You accused me of something i never did, suggested my sources are bitchute then upon realisation that you're talking out of your ass resorted to childish behaviour.

I'm more pro-choice when it comes to vax, the sheeple can do what they like, just don't try and force me into taking that poison.

It's been inferred i'm a lot of things on this forum, dim-witted is a new one.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Kurokage

Thoughts on the massive rise in all cause mortality post mass vaccination?

Care to post some evidence for the massive rise in mortality?

The small rise could down to many factors including missed appointments and missed oppertunities for diagnosing illness because of the move onto Doctors internet calls rather than actual oppointments.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Kurokage

Nothing arrogant about posting the truth.

You accused me of something i never did, suggested my sources are bitchute then upon realisation that you're talking out of your ass resorted to childish behaviour.

I'm more pro-choice when it comes to vax, the sheeple can do what they like, just don't try and force me into taking that poison.

It's been inferred i'm a lot of things on this forum, dim-witted is a new one.

Well you seem to have problems reading as I never called you dim-witted or accused you of posting threads with bitchute vids as evidence as most of the lastest anti-vax threads have been.
I accused you coming to the rescue of the dim-witted anti-vaxer ATS crowd.

a reply to: Kurokage

Shouldn't there have been a decrease after the big bad pandemic wiped out all the vulnerable and weak?

UK govenment - All Cause Mortality

Pick any week you like.

It's been up month on month since the start of the vaccination program. Make of that what you will.

viralimmunologist.substack.com...

Results of a small research study were published yesterday in the very high-impact medical journal called JAMA Pediatrics (JAMA stands for ‘Journal of the American Medical Association’). Unfortunately, the paper was not published as an ‘open access’ article, which means that most members of the public will not be able to easily obtain a copy of it. However, if you have a friend in academia, they might be able to get you a copy from this link. Here is the full citation: Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk. Hanna N, et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36156636

jamanetwork.com...

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Grenade

I never commented on the OP smart-ass.

Typical arrogant big-mouth.
So you what, You just came into the thread to post argumentative comments and not read the OP?
Was it to help the dim-witted anti-vaxers?

Its a good thing you don't talk this way to people irl.

I do if they are rude to me in the first place like most of you anti-vaxers have been on here.