Russia Tried to use its airforce again today

It did not go well

2x Su-30SM
VID
VID

1X Su-34
VID

1x Su-25
VID

1X Ka-52
VID

1X Iranian drone Mohajer-6 UCAV
VID

Several - Russian Geran-2 (Iranian Shahed-136)
VID


I think Russia is completely incapable of of projecting air power or securing air superiority, this much is obvious, if its not, then continue...

Poking the Bear may not end well.

originally posted by: nugget1
Poking the Bear may not end well.

Are you serious?

Dropped by parachute from a Tu-95V aircraft? that'll work? lol given Russia's air force is useless how far do you think a Tu-95 will get?

Too big to deploy against Ukraine or NATO, hence the reason tactical nukes are being banded around via Rashist Noob OSINT

Again, its not the 1960s

a reply to: TritonTaranis

All it takes is just one nuclear laden hypersonic to get through. Then it doesn’t really matter what anyone thinks about parachutes.

originally posted by: nugget1
Poking the Bear may not end well.

It seems Russia is the one doing the poking, so yes I agree.

I always thought hugging a nuke while it went off would be quickest and most painless one.
Where do I sign up

Russia creating failures and excuses to launch nukes !!!!!!!

Somebody's after the BRICS Bank !!!!☠️

☠️Petrodollars !!!!!☠️

originally posted by: 38181
a reply to: TritonTaranis

All it takes is just one nuclear laden hypersonic to get through. Then it doesn’t really matter what anyone thinks about parachutes.

Doesn't have the yield anywhere close to Tsar Bomba, or range to hit the country who is going to level the whole country shortly afterwards

Let Russia Threat away though, its making an all out Preemptive nuclear strike on Russia way more likely

originally posted by: nugget1
Poking the Bear may not end well.

Russia doesn't have a monopoly on nuclear weapons.

Even though they like to talk as if they have.

originally posted by: TritonTaranis

originally posted by: 38181
a reply to: TritonTaranis

All it takes is just one nuclear laden hypersonic to get through. Then it doesn’t really matter what anyone thinks about parachutes.

Doesn't have the yield anywhere close to Tsar Bomba, or range to hit the country who is going to level the whole country shortly afterwards

Let Russia Threat away though, its making an all out Preemptive nuclear strike on Russia way more likely

And whose going to do that? There is no way the US is going to strike Russia unless Russia puts nukes on our soil, not gonna happen

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian

originally posted by: TritonTaranis

originally posted by: 38181
a reply to: TritonTaranis

All it takes is just one nuclear laden hypersonic to get through. Then it doesn’t really matter what anyone thinks about parachutes.

Doesn't have the yield anywhere close to Tsar Bomba, or range to hit the country who is going to level the whole country shortly afterwards

Let Russia Threat away though, its making an all out Preemptive nuclear strike on Russia way more likely

And whose going to do that? There is no way the US is going to strike Russia unless Russia puts nukes on our soil, not gonna happen

I think thats the least likely outcome, do nothing etc

“Don’t. Don’t. Don’t,” Biden said. “You will change the face of war unlike anything since World War II.”

Biden declined to detail how the United States would respond, saying only that the reaction would be “consequential” and would depend “on the extent of what they do.”

The Biden administration would face a crisis if Russia were to use a small nuclear weapon in Ukraine, which isn’t a U.S. treaty ally. Any direct military U.S. response against Russia would risk the possibility of a wider war between nuclear-armed superpowers — the avoidance of which the Biden administration has made its No. 1 priority in all of its Ukraine policymaking.

Matthew Kroenig, a professor of government at Georgetown University and director of the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council, has argued that the best option for the administration, if faced with a limited Russian nuclear strike in Ukraine, might be to step up backing for Ukraine and conduct a limited conventional strike on the Russian forces or bases that launched the attack.

originally posted by: nugget1
Poking the Bear may not end well.

Who is poking the bear? The bear is trying it on with someone who happened to fight back.

The bear is utterly depressing.

originally posted by: paraphi

originally posted by: nugget1
Poking the Bear may not end well.

Who is poking the bear? The bear is trying it on with someone who happened to fight back.

The bear is utterly depressing.

You do realize a massive number of ethnic Russians in the East and South have been in conflict in the area for years.

With Ukrainian Nationalists who clear as day support Nazi, because they hated Stalin etc.

Google videos showing how ethnic Russians in that area have been treated bad. And or branded as “traitors”

So Russia steps in on call. Pro Zelensky call them invaders.

NATO influence looks to put weapons on Russias border for awhile (don’t compare other countries as they’ve been NATO for awhile and a completely different situation I.e massive number of ethnic Russians in eastern and southern Ukraine)

How would U.S feel if Russia started putting nukes and weapons on Mexicos border?

U.S wouldn’t like it to say it lightly.

It’s a complex situation obviously. To go around and say Ukraine nationalists with support from Ukraine are innocent is outrageous.

Ukraine hasn’t done Jack squat to defuse the conflict there. They’ve been ramping up

a reply to: paraphi

CIA infiltrated the Ukraine gov years back.. Who is fighting who here. The wests response speaks volumes.

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: paraphi

originally posted by: nugget1
Poking the Bear may not end well.

Who is poking the bear? The bear is trying it on with someone who happened to fight back.

The bear is utterly depressing.

So Russia steps in on call.

originally posted by: nugget1
Poking the Bear may not end well.

The bear being Ukraine in this case.

You quote a known liar and plagiarist.

Just because he holds a political position doesn’t change his character, evidenced by his declaration that the covid pandemic is over meanwhile the speaker of the house contradicted his statement.

Got a reliable source?

a reply to: TritonTaranis

Well, this is basically us relearning modern combat.

Remember people, Russia is a "Near Peer Adversary" basically, we're not too far off metric wise on the combat scales.

How and why Russia can't maintain Air Superiority is a goldmine of information that could be very useful in future conflicts with an actual peer adversary.

War changes an evolves and so must we. The US is rightfully a warmongering civilization, equipped with the best. Lets not devolve into imperials again, rather, lets really tighten up our forces and learn as much as possible from this proxy war abroad.

a reply to: nugget1

Poking the Bear may not end well.

Feels more like a punchline than a threat.

a reply to: xuenchen

That's what it is all about when all is said and done. The US defense force has been used to invade countries that don't play ball with the petrodollar. Blackrock and Advantage own or have controlling interests in all things. Russia is on the list.