It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Bluntone22
I'm not a Monarchist really, can take them or leave them.
But as Heads of State come QEII was pretty good and conducted herself with remarkable dignity.
Despite what many believe the Monarch has no real power, a bit of influence yes, but no actual power.
Its been said and explained time and time again, we have a Constitutional Monarchy.
To be honest, I find the whole principle behind an hereditary monarchy quite repugnant.
But what are the alternatives?
A Cromwell?
A Macron or Merkel?
Heaven forbid, a Trump or Biden?
Or even a Putin?
No thanks.
As I stated in other threads;
DISRAELI came up with something in one of the earlier threads about QEII.
Its something I hadn't considered but quite true:
A democracy is, by definition, divided by politics, so a head of state chosen by politics is likely to be hated by half his people. See Obama. See Trump,
So the only way a democracy can find a sense of stable unity is to have a national representative NOT chosen by politics. Step forward hereditary succession. It works. If it had not existed, we should have tried to invent it.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Bluntone22
And history.
This for us Americans is probably similar to the British understanding of American gun culture.
We are born and raised with things that have just always been.
you are brainwashed
Tinkety tonk old fruit & down with the Nazis!