Dr. Shoemaker - Covid Vaccinated Children Are 82x More Likely To Die Than Unvaccinated Children

a reply to: Kurokage

Evidence, in a Virtuoso thread?!?!

You're having a laugh mate...

You've got more chance of finding lord Lucan...

PA

a reply to: fencesitter85

a reply to: PerfectAnomoly

I should know by now V1rtu0s0 only posts opinion piece videos and doom porn.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: fencesitter85

a reply to: PerfectAnomoly

I should know by now V1rtu0s0 only posts opinion piece videos and doom porn.

And the 35 flags taking it to the front page just shows how incapable his followers are of critical thinking.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I thought covid vaxxing of children had wisely been banned.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: incoserv

saline is just salt and water...

Same salinity as the ocean actually

Doctors are baffled!

www.thegatewaypundit.com... actly-happened/

originally posted by: carewemust
Doctors are baffled!

www.thegatewaypundit.com... actly-happened/

That's baffling. I mean... im just baffled.

a reply to: Kurokage

I don't need data, I've seen the effects the jab has had on family and friends, my brother now gets Every illness his children get, immune system of a 5 year old, vaccination 666

I blame the pushers

People like you

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Dr. Chris Shoemaker recently reported on the data made available from ONS that compares children who received a saline injections with those who received 2 shots. In the beginning it was thought there would be a small benefit from receiving the vaccine, but the initial data showed that 10-14-year-old children who received an mRNA shot had a 52x higher chance of death. In May 2022, when millions were included in the sample size, it was shown that children had an 82x greater risk of mortality if injected twice with the Covid vaccines.

We are starting to see the pendulum swing in the other direction, however, as first Britain dropped the shots for children, and now Denmark ends Covid vaccinations for almost everyone under 50 years old.

SOURCE VIDEO

Clip from Dr. Trozzi’s interview with Dr. Shoemaker

Data is from the UK.

They used a two tier system to vax kids.

The data that you're seeing doesn't show that vaxxed kids are more likely to die, it shows that children with comorbidity are more likely to die than children without comorbidity.

If you understood statistics, you'd have realised this and not posted such a silly and easily debunked article. The ONS data from your own source shows this.

Your own source debunks itself.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I thought covid vaxxing of children had wisely been banned.

No, the OP lied. Read the original thread that they started. If you read to the bottom you'll see that what actually happened was that a time limited vax campaign aimed at school aged kids came to an end. Exactly when it was originally advertized to come to an end.

originally posted by: rickymouse
I do not know if these figures are real or not so I cannot comment on this thread other than to state that it could be true or it could be not true.

Medical research is often misinterpretted to benefit some group or person, and that is common not rare. Unless I can read multiple research which is funded by neutral parties, I can't consider it real. I do read a lot of medical research funded by the NIH and I do not see it being interpretted properly by Fauchi and the heads of the CDC....their science they tout is just their opinion a lot, they are bureaucrats looking to gain power and funding for their agencies.

If you read the source data it actually shows that children with comorbidity were vaxxed in great numbers, and are more likely to die ... because they have comorbidity.

The fact that they were vaxxed is merely window dressing. Child with renal failure dies from renal failure, doesn't make as good a threat name.

Dr. Shoemaker - Covid Vaccinated Children Are 82x More Likely To Die Than Unvaccinated Children

82? That's a very large percentage.

So, where are all the dead children?

Are you a disinfo agent?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: rickymouse
I do not know if these figures are real or not so I cannot comment on this thread other than to state that it could be true or it could be not true.

Medical research is often misinterpretted to benefit some group or person, and that is common not rare. Unless I can read multiple research which is funded by neutral parties, I can't consider it real. I do read a lot of medical research funded by the NIH and I do not see it being interpretted properly by Fauchi and the heads of the CDC....their science they tout is just their opinion a lot, they are bureaucrats looking to gain power and funding for their agencies.

If you read the source data it actually shows that children with comorbidity were vaxxed in great numbers, and are more likely to die ... because they have comorbidity.

The fact that they were vaxxed is merely window dressing. Child with renal failure dies from renal failure, doesn't make as good a threat name.

It is supposed to protect those with comorbilities, but this vaccine actually can accentuate the problem because it does have some toxic effect on liver cells. I do not consider it an adequately safe vaccine. Even though I cannot take a flu vaccine, it is safe for the majority of people and does not have the danger of doing organ damage that the spike protein has. I am not antivax, I just do not believe this vaccine was evaluated properly because of a change in the rules for testing that was done....warp speed sucked.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry

Dr. Shoemaker - Covid Vaccinated Children Are 82x More Likely To Die Than Unvaccinated Children

82? That's a very large percentage.

So, where are all the dead children?

They're the ones with renal failure, congenital heart defects, and diabetes. The ones who were vaxxed first and who had the most boosters.

The data that the OP is claiming shows that children are more likely to die if vaxxed really shows that children with comorbidity are more likely to die. Oh, and they're vaxxed more often than other children.

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: rickymouse
I do not know if these figures are real or not so I cannot comment on this thread other than to state that it could be true or it could be not true.

Medical research is often misinterpretted to benefit some group or person, and that is common not rare. Unless I can read multiple research which is funded by neutral parties, I can't consider it real. I do read a lot of medical research funded by the NIH and I do not see it being interpretted properly by Fauchi and the heads of the CDC....their science they tout is just their opinion a lot, they are bureaucrats looking to gain power and funding for their agencies.

If you read the source data it actually shows that children with comorbidity were vaxxed in great numbers, and are more likely to die ... because they have comorbidity.

The fact that they were vaxxed is merely window dressing. Child with renal failure dies from renal failure, doesn't make as good a threat name.

It is supposed to protect those with comorbilities, but this vaccine actually can accentuate the problem because it does have some toxic effect on liver cells. I do not consider it an adequately safe vaccine. Even though I cannot take a flu vaccine, it is safe for the majority of people and does not have the danger of doing organ damage that the spike protein has. I am not antivax, I just do not believe this vaccine was evaluated properly because of a change in the rules for testing that was done....warp speed sucked.

Source on the "toxic effect" on the liver.

The vax is protecting people with comorbidity, but:

1) It's not 100 percent effective
2) It won't protect them from their actual comorbidity

A child with a congenital heart condition who gets vaxxed won't be protected from their congenital heart, only covid.

The OP has this habit of posting that people who are vaxxed the most die the most, and hoping that nobody realizes that the people who are vaxxed the most tend to be the elderly and those with comorbidity.

They also post everything as if it's vax related.

Remember when they posted about all of those "new" graves, that turned out to be existing graves which needed repairing due to flooding.

Or that BA pilot who they said died of a heart attack because the vax became deadly at altitude, but it turned out that he died after a collision on an off road mountain bike trail.

Or the people who allegedly emit Bluetooth signals.

Or the people who became magnetic

Or Shedding

Or VAIDS, which somehow doesn't kill people who have AIDS

Or how all of these athletes were supposedly dying suddenly, with a link to a site that includes retired athletes who were seniors, and people who died suddenly ... because they were murdered, or were involved in an auto wreck.

Remember how wearing masks in school was supposed to cause oxygen starvation in children.

It's been what .... two years now.

Even if the vax was an untried experimental drug on day one of it's genral release it's certainly not now. hundreds of millions of people have been vaxxed 2, 3 or even 4 times. We have more data about these vaxxes (Because there's several different ones, after all) than we have for probably most vax released int he last 10 years.

The main actual rule that was "changed" was that the vax companies were allowed to start manufacturing and distributing the vax before the trials had finished. So that when the trials had been completed, they could start vaxxing people right away.

No actual safety criteria were relaxed.

originally posted by: hombero
Are you a disinfo agent?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I'm pretty sure that they're doing it off of their own back. Maybe for the clicks or an affiliate link on their own social media, or maybe just for the attention.

Some people are making big coin from ad revenue on their doom porn sites and forums, other people just like creating fear or doubt. It makes them feel powerful.

I'm pretty certain that they don't actually believe their own posts because they post things that contradict themselves or things that they've said in the past.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: carewemust
Doctors are baffled!

www.thegatewaypundit.com... actly-happened/

That's baffling. I mean... im just baffled.

Nothing new there really seeing how easy you swollow opinion pieces and religious websites claiming to be scientific!

poted by me on another thread but I think it also could apply here..

Its funny to see the usual American anti-vaxers screaming on here like Karens with the "won't somebody please think of the children" threads trying to claim the jab is killing children, I wonder if the same posters feel the same when someone shoots up a school? The biggest killer of children in America now is the firearm!
Do you protest as much when children are shot? Are you posting on here daily about making changes to your gun ownership laws or mental health checks? Or are you the same people screaming about your 2nd amemedment rights when someone mentions even a slight change????

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: carewemust
Doctors are baffled!

www.thegatewaypundit.com... actly-happened/

That's baffling. I mean... im just baffled.

Nothing new there really seeing how easy you swollow opinion pieces and religious websites claiming to be scientific!

poted by me on another thread but I think it also could apply here..

Its funny to see the usual American anti-vaxers screaming on here like Karens with the "won't somebody please think of the children" threads trying to claim the jab is killing children, I wonder if the same posters feel the same when someone shoots up a school? The biggest killer of children in America now is the firearm!
Do you protest as much when children are shot? Are you posting on here daily about making changes to your gun ownership laws or mental health checks? Or are you the same people screaming about your 2nd amemedment rights when someone mentions even a slight change????

You might find this amusing, but they once posted a link to a peer review article that they thought proved me wrong on a particular topic, but they'd obviously not read further than the text on the Google search page because the actual content that they quoted wasn't in the article at all. It was a comment by a user.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: carewemust
Doctors are baffled!

www.thegatewaypundit.com... actly-happened/

That's baffling. I mean... im just baffled.

Nothing new there really seeing how easy you swollow opinion pieces and religious websites claiming to be scientific!

poted by me on another thread but I think it also could apply here..

Its funny to see the usual American anti-vaxers screaming on here like Karens with the "won't somebody please think of the children" threads trying to claim the jab is killing children, I wonder if the same posters feel the same when someone shoots up a school? The biggest killer of children in America now is the firearm!
Do you protest as much when children are shot? Are you posting on here daily about making changes to your gun ownership laws or mental health checks? Or are you the same people screaming about your 2nd amemedment rights when someone mentions even a slight change????

You might find this amusing, but they once posted a link to a peer review article that they thought proved me wrong on a particular topic, but they'd obviously not read further than the text on the Google search page because the actual content that they quoted wasn't in the article at all. It was a comment by a user.

I'ts like they have the attention span of a gnat, which is why its all opinion pieces and bitchute videos posted as "evidence" most of the time.