Code Word For Depopulation ?

I am concerned about just what kind of climate this climate change talk is about. Some of these green policies are generating a lot of hot heads.

Lol your insight on low income pregnancies is hilarious. They aren’t getting knocked up because they are stupid and lack understand not at all not even close.

They are getting knocked up and being single terrible mothers to a host of little retards because scocity has given them the green light and the bucks to do so. They are told it’s brave a strong to be a single mother and the there is a whole system in place to help perpetuate the problem because the state pays for it.

If those kids didn’t come with a pay cheque you best believe the girls would have flawless contraceptive use.
It’s the same here in Canada especially with natives. They arnt stupid or vulnerable or any buzz word. They are entrepreneurial!



a reply to: AaarghZombies

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Nothing to do with the 1943 Bengal Famine my arse. LoL

Winston Churchill was a staunch imperialist and monarchist, AaarghZombies and pretty much a racist.

And the Bengal Famine was down to complete and utter failure of British policy as much as it was to do with drought or anything else.

Im criticizing him for his involvement in the death of 3 to 4 million people down to starvation, simple as that.

Great war-time PM, but he had his issues and problems to contend with, that's a fact, and reflected in the things he said and did throughout his life.

www.bbc.co.uk...

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: andy06shake

Thanks , it does look that by 2100 will be over 10 billion .


Maybe there is allready fix for that ( vaccines , poisoned food/water , )

One of those Ted talks explained how it is actually going to go down as people become EDUCATED.. that one I don't know where it is but someone may know now and can help us find it?

I have people here at the house, not enough time to look.

ETA

Another thread on DEPOPULATION related to the Chinese situation.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Nothing to do with the 1943 Bengal Famine my arse. LoL

Winston Churchill was a staunch imperialist and monarchist, AaarghZombies and pretty much a racist.

And the Bengal Famine was down to complete and utter failure of British policy as much as it was to do with drought or anything else.

Im criticizing him for his involvement in the death of 3 to 4 million people down to starvation, simple as that.

Great war-time PM, but he had his issues and problems to contend with, that's a fact, and reflected in the things he said and did throughout his life.

www.bbc.co.uk...

He was a bureaucrat with limited power and extremely long lines of communication. He didn't typically didn't know what was going on, only what had already happened, and at most he set policy. If you want to blame someone them blame the local officials who were the people that were actually involved in events because 90 percent of what happened in the British empire happened in isolation because people were dependant on telegrams and letters.

Churchill had a choice, after the famine had started he could order ships on weeks long journeys to steal grain from warehouses elsewhere in the empire, load them with grain, which would then take weeks to get to Bengal. He could then order troops to steal pack animals from the local peasants, and order the peasants to abandon their farms to undertake weeks long journeys to distribute the grain to people. Many of whom were already dead of starvation by that time.

He would then need to order yet more troops to steal yet more grain from elsewhere in the empire to replace the grain that he'd stolen to take to Bengal. Which would take weeks, if not months, by which time who knows how many more people would have died because they needed the grain that he'd stolen from them.

Did I mention the stealing?

Ask yourself this, would Bengal have faired any better had it not been part of the British empire?

This was 1943, Churchill didn't have the internet. He couldn't search a database to see who had grain to spare, he couldn't just charter ships to send the grain to Bengal, and he couldn't hire a fleet of trucks to deliver it. Everything that he sent to Bengal he'd have to steal from someone else.

His views on race were typical for the time. This was when Africans really did live in mud huts, and chased animals around with spears while wearing loin cloths. Most of the racist stereotypes that we have today are based on real things from history. They're outdated by today's standards, but in Churchill's time Africa was maybe as much as 1,000 years behind Britain once you left the cities.

originally posted by: Athetos
Lol your insight on low income pregnancies is hilarious. They aren’t getting knocked up because they are stupid and lack understand not at all not even close.

They are getting knocked up and being single terrible mothers to a host of little retards because scocity has given them the green light and the bucks to do so. They are told it’s brave a strong to be a single mother and the there is a whole system in place to help perpetuate the problem because the state pays for it.

If those kids didn’t come with a pay cheque you best believe the girls would have flawless contraceptive use.
It’s the same here in Canada especially with natives. They arnt stupid or vulnerable or any buzz word. They are entrepreneurial!



a reply to: AaarghZombies

This was my actual comment

We call this P-Hacking, or Probability-hacking.

It's where you take a whole bunch of numbers, data or statistics and you look for similar values that - if taken together - could be made to look like a trend, if you remove all of the contradictory values. Or, where you take something that you want to signal boost and look for things that seem to be related to it.

It's based on the idea that if you get enough information together you can find things that seem similar, but are really just by coincidences or are otherwise unrelated.

For example, if you take the prophesies of Nostradamus, you can find dozens of historical events that could sort or maybe be made to fit together, to promote just about any agenda you want purely on the basis that enough things have happened in human history that some of them will fit by pure coincidence.

A good example of this are the graphs that appear to show that the introduction of the MMR vaccine is linked to a rise in the number of cases of autism.

If you look at the data from Europe and the US it appears to track pretty closely, and if you look at the data from Africa where they didn't use the MMR and didn't have a corresponding rise in autism it also seems to track. This is because the people making the graphs deliberately excluded data from countries like Japan where they had a near identical rise in cases of autism despite them using separate vaccines for years.

The actual cause now seems to be a combination of women having children later in life, and people widening the definition of autism in order to include more people because this was a good way of triggering extra funding for things like education.

I don't mention low income pregnancies in it.

You're thinking of somewhere else.

a reply to: Kenzo

I think the ''they'' you use is ambiguous. They being anyone who wants to talk about current trends. I think people like new words, this is how we get so much slang. Slang can start at the top and be used as propaganda messaging such as I think your OP is considering, or it can be created on the streets among regular people and slowly become the ''new jargon'', the ''new and hip jargon'' that after a while everybody wants to use because it helps them think they are part of the evolving social scene. Then of course if that new jargon catches enough attention by the masses, commercialization then picks it up and begins to use it for advertising and self promotion. ''See how cool our product is"" It also can be used by politicians who want to be popular or just simply trying to communicate with the rest of us.

Couple that innocuous explanation with the potential for people who want do be the discoverer of ''new secrets'' or ''new conspiracies'' trying to ascertain each and every little glimmer of elitist propaganda being used to control our minds and you get people like from the video who resort to deciphering patterns in wording or numbering or whatever. If, and only IF, there is a central authority from which these phrases or words originate, then this can be a good thing, helping to discover the tools being used to control us. But if there isn't, then the whole expose is meaningless and just one person trying to be the next big Conspiracy Detective. I suspect that in this case, that is the case.

And that does not mean that there is not a whole lot of controlling mechanisms around us at any given time. Hell, I may be one and don't even know it.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Ask yourself this, would Bengal have faired any better had it not been part of the British empire?

You can try and polish the turd and justify it any way you choose AaarghZombies but the policy of the British Empire and Churchill's actions, or rather inaction, directly contributed 1943 Bengal Famine in which 3-4 million people died.

As to his racial views, well attempting to judge or hold people of the past to the standards of today tends to bode badly, but that doesn't change the fact that he was an imperialist royalist who liked to call brown/black people "wogs".

And it was not just aboard Churchill committed all allowed to happen some rather spurious acts, he put, are at least allowed to be deployed, tanks and troops armed with machine guns onto the streets of his own cities in an attempt to smash the trade union strikes of the time.

Again i think the man was a great wartime prime minister but he had his faults.

Nobody is perfect, certainly not our politicians and Winston Churchill is no different in that respect.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire


Yeeh It`s ambiguous term . I am not so good with words to be honest, or accurate


There are clickbaits , there are gatekeepers , people who want to be famous , and there is allways huge load of deception around us so knowing which is what is not allways easy .

Maybe this was just some sort of new trend like flat earth distraction was / is with this numbers thing .


In ancient Rome , bread and circus was offered to people for distracting attention from a problem or grievance....in 2022 we are bombed with high amount of news ,information,opinions, conspiracy theorys etc that it too takes time/energy to process ...in a way it is also distracting ...So all these ideas, storys views take our time , while TPTB keep on pushing the agenda . Thought a lot fake is pre-filtered out before entering to ATS realm .

I doubt youtube would exist today if it would not help TPTB , it`s been used all this time to spread deception etc , lies and just huge amount of everything , thought also have good info .

a reply to: andy06shake

You can try and polish the turd and justify it any way you choose

Justify what, exactly?

the policy of the British Empire and Churchill's actions, or rather inaction, directly contributed

The fact remains that the course of action that you're suggesting was to send in soldiers to steal food from poverty stricken people. I'm so glad that you think that this would have made Churchill a hero in your eyes, because where I come from we don't take kindly to people stealing food from the poor.

attempting to judge or hold people of the past to the standards of today tends to bode badly, but that doesn't change the fact that he was an imperialist royalist who liked to call brown/black people "wogs".

Which was perfectly normal for the time. How else could the man have been?

In 100 years time you're probably going to be thought of as a barbarian for using fossil fuel powered vehicles and eating meat. In fact you're entire generation will may compare to Hitler and you will be blamed for the murder of millions due to climate change.

It's also deeply alarming that you think that action and inaction are remotely comparable. This was a no-win situation, had he taken those grain supplies there could have been famine and civil unrest in the countries that he raided. It could have lead to war, and this was 1943, so that's a war on top of WWII.

As yourself this, why didn't the people who actually owned that grain send it to Bengal themselves?

a reply to: Kenzo

A summary of the video should have been provided per the T&C's.

a reply to: Kenzo

You sound as if you already have a grasp of the perspective I was suggesting. Yes, we are constantly bombarded by ''stuff'' that grabs our attention though exactly how much of that is designed to keep us from focusing on larger things as compared to 'stuff'' that just wants to grab our attention to sell a product like in advertising.

There are conspiracy people who consider tptb as a nefarious cabal of world controllers that may or may not go back long ago with designs at world domination, I am not one of those people who believe that. This is not to say that I deny that society has been subjected to ''control'' but rather it's that my view of tptb are not like some would portray it to be.

I see them as those who have risen to the tops of the established power system. I see that power system basically as the economic system by which stuff is produced, traded and sold. What may have begun as simply one person seeking to trade a horse for a cow, or a bushel of corn for a hammer. Each thinking that they got the better side of the bargain.
Then of course there was the guy who decided to trade a ''sick'' horse for a ''healthy'' cow without telling the other guy about it being sick.

And that is where I think we are today. People selling stuff to other people with promises of this and that when in reality the product is not as great as it is promoted to be. And now, basically, those ''sellers'' are for the most part major corporations that do most of the producing and own most of the transportation and selling of product. Those people at the top are to my way of seeing things the powers that be. And yes they are nefarious because they see the rest of us as nothing more than the toss away part of their profit schemes. Each will buy and sell, lie and cheat to keep their own korporate kingdoms at the apex of the wealth pyramid.

I don't know about code words so much as them directly saying multiple times from multiple people that we need to reduce the population. No code needed, they've said it a lot.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Justify what, exactly?

The fact that Churchill had a hand in the Bengal famine springs to mind.

Which was perfectly normal for the time. How else could the man have been?

Less racist and imperialistic might be nice, so there is that.

Racism has never been normal unless you are in a room with other racists imho.

As yourself this, why didn't the people who actually owned that grain send it to Bengal themselves?

I don't have a clue, as i was not there, same as yourself.

However, the place was still a colony where British rule held sway and Churchill was perfectly aware of the situation transpiring.

Hence his complicity, considering the failure of policy which contributed to 3-4 million dead.

As to what people will think about me in 100 years time, well i don't suppose it will be much if anything to be honest, nor do i particularly care.

I find it deeply alarming that you fail to see Churchill's shortcomings considering the comparison with the Bengal famine and what Stalin did in Ukraine aka millions of dead people.

Touch of hero worship going on there?

Nobody is perfect AaarghZombies certainly not Winston Churchill.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Justify what, exactly?

The fact that Churchill had a hand in the Bengal famine springs to mind.

Which was perfectly normal for the time. How else could the man have been?

Less racist and imperialistic might be nice, so there is that.

Racism has never been normal unless you are in a room with other racists imho.

As yourself this, why didn't the people who actually owned that grain send it to Bengal themselves?

I don't have a clue, as i was not there, same as yourself.

However, the place was still a colony where British rule held sway and Churchill was perfectly aware of the situation transpiring.

Hence his complicity, considering the failure of policy which contributed to 3-4 million dead.

As to what people will think about me in 100 years time, well i don't suppose it will be much if anything to be honest, nor do i particularly care.

I find it deeply alarming that you fail to see Churchill's shortcomings considering the comparison with the Bengal famine and what Stalin did in Ukraine aka millions of dead people.

Touch of hero worship going on there?

Nobody is perfect AaarghZombies certainly not Winston Churchill.

Why are you arguing with AZ? Trouble in paradise?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

During the 1950s and 1960s China, Russia, and a host of other communist countries suffered food shortages of horrifying proportions. Millions died.

According to your logic this must have been population control.

In reality it was because the people in charge had absolutely no idea about farming or logistics. So they ordered people to plant the wrong crops in the wrong places, and at the wrong times, and if by pure effort somebody manager to produce something it ended up rotting in a train carriage somewhere because an idiot leader didn't realize that you couldn't magic a thousands tonnes of wet grain into dry bread for a population a thousand miles away.

You're example, while I get the sentiment, doesn't even support your own argument. If anything it support mine because the censorship is a knee jerk reaction because they didn't understand their potential audiences. They were incompetent and panicked to cover it up.

And Bill Gate's support for anti-malaria campaigns has probably saved millions.

Much of all this started in the 40s and 50s with the idea the world could only produce enough food for 3 to 4 billion and after that people would starve. This was also during the time of still massive population growth based on that much of the world was poor and kids were free labor, so having 8 with a couple dying was still a significant number past the 2.1 needed.

As we entered the 1990s much of this NWO over population growth was really no longer an issue as population modules were redesigned with points not considered before.

The US has been in population decline for decades and our only growth is immigration. EU is the same as is so many other places outside of Africa and a few 3rd world areas. China is in dire straights in they do not have a baby production to support their country now and so has been in a death spiral for decades too. By 2050 their population will be under 600k, old with no working class to support. Musk has said the exponential threat to us all is depopulation at a rate we can not control and so Billions will be gone in sort order. That depopulation is as simple as people are not having 2.1 babies per couple, hell we don't even have couples anymore.

We are well on our way to the depopulation prophecy without any NWO help. Economist have predicted this as a society hits middle class kids stop being an asset and start to be a lability. In poor countries kids are still free slave labor, but that isn't what we see anymore throughout the world as they become a big cost instead that people today just do not want to deal with or really need to, so in 100 years we will be 1/2 the population we are today, so what is the hurry?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

More like a difference of opinion but probably because we share a diffrent view of on the Man in question springs to mind.

I recognize him for what what he is, a politician, with accomplishment and failures, arguably one of the best war-time prime ministers the UK ever produced, where as AZ seems to think he can or did no wrong.

People just are not built that way, especially people who attain power, not even Churchill by my estimation.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Well i am not yet there to really know for sure the type of TPTB in details . Granted your view makes also sense, just look what only 2 companys Vanguard & Blackrock own as whole or shares ...this situation that few rich entitys own almost everything or at least use influence is beyond wrong in terms of getting a working society/World

The whole cabal theory is most likely muddled on purpose with as many different versions possible, so it`s more harder to get good grip on it.

But i think there is also spiritual realm in TPTB , something non-human controlling the human controllers.....at least that`s been my feeling allways . Was it demons, Demiurge, archon , Lucifer....?


Materialism has too much power in this realm ...

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yeeh they are quite open about it, no hiding ....

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yeeh they are quite open about it, no hiding ....

I don't judge, I know they fly the rainbow flag.