538 model has Republicans winning the House 3 to 1 this is driving the rhetoric

Hopefull this will be the beginning of the impeachment of the worst president in the history of the US.

Let the impeachment drag until general elections day soo Kamala does not stand a chance to get in the oval office.

originally posted by: marg6043
Hopefull this will be the beginning of the impeachment of the worst president in the history of the US.

Let the impeachment drag until general elections day soo Kamala does not stand a chance to get in the oval office.

Hell, I wouldn't even do that unless it's extremely obvious. None of that is actually good for the country, there are easily a hundred things more important to the common American.

Let's get back to the legislative branch legislating for all of us and not for one side or the other. Or for grandstanding committee hearings.

a reply to: putnam6

No. They would not have the whole of the military 10% might be high or might be low. That there are those that would give such orders and some would follow them is disturbing enough. What I have seen these past six years is far, far beyond Bush did it/Obama is a Muslim.

Joe’s speech was a planned event. It wasn’t off the cuff. Wasn’t just stream of consciousness ramblings. This was practiced, polished and rehearsed. All over losing power at the Midterms…an event that happens historically. Only now it is a big deal because they have made it a big deal. And Joe has basically threatened war if they lose Congress.

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: putnam6

No. They would not have the whole of the military 10% might be high or might be low. That there are those that would give such orders and some would follow them is disturbing enough. What I have seen these past six years is far, far beyond Bush did it/Obama is a Muslim.

Joe’s speech was a planned event. It wasn’t off the cuff. Wasn’t just stream of consciousness ramblings. This was practiced, polished and rehearsed. All over losing power at the Midterms…an event that happens historically. Only now it is a big deal because they have made it a big deal. And Joe has basically threatened war if they lose Congress.

I don't know any of that and thanks for discussing this on Friday evening BTW. Ive got my opinions but I just can't see Biden behind all these elaborate conspiracy claims.

I just see it as a failed attempt to motivate voters because the margins in the polls have grown so large and it's seriously affecting some key areas in Congressional, Senate, and even gubernatorial races.

I didn't say it wasn't planned practiced polishes and rehearsed, just saying it amounted to nothing more than an angry old man yelling at the sky. Why because it's all he has got, he has no plan no answers. I can easily see this as a setup to help usher him out somehow, besides we can't have it both ways either he is dementia Joe or he isn't, I lean towards the former.

Why can't it be that Joe was installed as the DNC's man because he was the only one even close to being electable and now he is just in it for the money, have no doubt after all of the years in politics he has seen some major bucks being thrown around, and now he sees this as his turn? Last night wasn't some prelude to anything but desperation at not just losing the house but losing it by a huge margin, making it unlikely they can get it back soon.

Having congressional approval makes it easier to get funds and financing for all the projects you get kickbacks on. FWIW sure this has been done a while again by both sides, this was just the Democrats' turn.

Isn't that a much more likely scenario? It's a money grab and has been for decades, it's just they have gotten progressively more brazen about it.

a reply to: putnam6

Sounds about right. Might even be the higher end. Calling his opponents a threat is backfiring.

It's currently 219 - 211 Blue Team. Red Team takes at minimum 25 seats back. And no deep state paranoid whatever is going to stop it.

When the president tries to shame all the Trump endorsed candidates (and supporters), and says them winning is 'dangerous' I feel you've witnessed the extent of what they can do. Call 'em a threat and hope for the best.

I'll call it right here.

The final score will be similar to 114th congress. Around 243 - 192.

No worries. This is the phase of democracy where the blue team tanks and the red team takes over.

Rinse/repeat

a reply to: putnam6

I hope your right.

But, yeah, the left has never ever resorted to tactics like rioting and burning down cities, right,? (cough cough antifa BLM) And they've never called on their drones to publicly attack and harass the opposition, right? (cough cough pelosi jackson kevenaugh's house)

And we all know that the government would never state s false flag to further an agenda. (cough cough 9/11)

So there's that? I'm sure it'll all be right. At least, I hope so. Fact is, I don't trust of these illegitimate motherless sons.

originally posted by: marg6043
Hopefull this will be the beginning of the impeachment of the worst president in the history of the US.

Let the impeachment drag until general elections day soo Kamala does not stand a chance to get in the oval office.

kamala would likely be worse.

FAR worse.

If we impeach biden, we MUST be ready to do kam & nancy at exactly the same time, and for proceedings to be almost instantaneous so joe can't resign or die before they are concluded for all 3.

democrats must be so proud of what they've done.



We will survive the biden idiot, they already exhausted most of their less than actual civil war tools.

I do understand the sentiment though.

a reply to: Degradation33


I think 1994 is a better comparison to what will happen, +54 & +8, and there is an outside chance at +62 & +11.

Clinton wasn't nearly as bad as biden in those first 2 years, and he gave team Red their first congressional majority in 40 years.

Senior democrats must see the same or worse, no other explanation for last night's speech.

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: Degradation33


I think 1994 is a better comparison to what will happen, +54 & +8, and there is an outside chance at +62 & +11.

Clinton wasn't nearly as bad as biden in those first 2 years, and he gave team Red their first congressional majority in 40 years.

Senior democrats must see the same or worse, no other explanation for last night's speech.

well newt was speaker then

we have mitch.

originally posted by: sarahvital

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: Degradation33


I think 1994 is a better comparison to what will happen, +54 & +8, and there is an outside chance at +62 & +11.

Clinton wasn't nearly as bad as biden in those first 2 years, and he gave team Red their first congressional majority in 40 years.

Senior democrats must see the same or worse, no other explanation for last night's speech.

well newt was speaker then

we have mitch.

True, mitch is worse than completely irrelevant, and Newt is GREATLY missed, but we do have some very significant advantages over the challenges we faced in 94.

Back then grass roots conservatives of all flavors had near zero ability to communicate with each other on a nationwide platform, save for Rush's call-in program that was wildly successful at the time and a few (very) late night AM radio shows with tiny audiences (but fantastic CTs).


#1 on that list of advantages:

Now we have ATS (and I hear there are some other 'internet' sites where folks can communicate with each other and the world) which is an absolute game changer that's even forced most other media to be a little (very little) less biased (completely owned) by the democrat party.

In 94, this complete lack of any type of nationwide communication platform made us feel a little like a one eyed quadruple amputee entering a professional boxing match.

While it might not seem like it in the here and now, the democrat party is no longer able to silence everyone that doesn't agree with them, leading to joe's recent fascist(ish) speech being retracted by joe in less than 18 hours for example.

Newt had a near perfectly executed brilliant plan in 94, and shocked the democrat party to it's core in ways that it still hasn't recovered from.

We'll have to do it on our own this time, which certainly won't be easy, but early indications are far more positive for us than they ever were in 94 (which is why democrats were desperate enough to roll the dice on biden's fascist(ish) speech).

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: putnam6

Don't count on it.


If they can hook or crook mail in voting for "any" reason, they will have both the house and the senate.

I'd like to see this happen and then see everyone ask how the models could be so wrong when never in history have they been so wrong.

They will tell you your eyes and ears have been lying to you for 2 years and that you are a racist, white supremcist, sexist, yada yada yada for even questioning it.

It’s been working for them so why not??

originally posted by: tovenar
It’s Nearly 90 days til November.

So many sealed warrants for trump

So little time

They would have buried him beneath Leavenworth already had they found ANYTHING on this man.

The fact you ppl can’t see that at all is very telling of your mental state.

a reply to: putnam6

Joe’s decisions are things like pet the dog, ride the bike, eat some ice cream and maybe sniff a kid. This was done for him, 100%. There might have been a kid or ice cream bribe for a good job. But the whole production was nuttier than Obama’s Greek God Coronation Event…and that was a wardrobe malfunction shy of a Super Bowl Halftime show.


But if people wanted to set a goofy political scene for passing out trick or treat candy this year. There are plenty of pictures to set it up right.

Time delayed double post.

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: putnam6

Joe’s decisions are things like pet the dog, ride the bike, eat some ice cream and maybe sniff a kid. This was done for him, 100%. There might have been a kid or ice cream bribe for a good job. But the whole production was nuttier than Obama’s Greek God Coronation Event…and that was a wardrobe malfunction shy of a Super Bowl Halftime show.


But if people wanted to set a goofy political scene for passing out trick or treat candy this year. There are plenty of pictures to set it up right.

What's the old Chinese proverb

"May you live in interesting times"

We certainly are.

I only listened to about 10 minutes or so, live and my initial thought is the DNC just "jumped the shark".

Heading to Labor Day weekend he should have highlighted the positives like the Artemis mission for example. You know as all the great Democrats did from FDR to JFK, both led during infinitely more difficult times, yet both were more optimistic than this Biden administration currently seems to be.

Remember the "Dark Winter" comments

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: putnam6

Don't count on it.


If they can hook or crook mail in voting for "any" reason, they will have both the house and the senate.

Once they have that, they will pass their "Voter Fraud" bill to make mail in voting permanent. This is their most important issue.

Not counting on anything, but seriously is it possible to have a thread where it doesn't turn into such speculative BS all the time?

The point remains all we are hearing is because of the elections and their numbers are seriously behind. There is no damn way they can influence, change or cheat on every congressional seat available. PERIOD

When talking about possibilities in the future is it not speculating?