Is conflict preferable to submission?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher

originally posted by: Annee
Ehhh, the Traditionalists are trying to hang on to everything they know. They fear change. They fear new ideas.

But the pendulum always swings.

Looking forward to Gen-G. They don't have to undo.

Should Ukraine submit to russia's insane and violently delivered demands for the country to be part of russia?


Should Trump have submitted to the democrat party's insane demands that he resign over their pee tape hoax?




Nothing about anyone's responses to the democrat's insanity has EVER been even a little bit related to fearing change or any kind of pendulum.

Not even remotely close.

We don't submit to threats or violence, and we don't submit to false allegations.

Not when made by a madman with nukes, or a wannabe madman in a presidential address.

No matter the cost.

He said cults are dangerous. They are.

This has nothing to do with Russia and Ukraine.

He said a LOT more than that and you know it, that was NOT an urgent speech about 'cults', it was a pathetically poorly veiled series of false accusations and threats made against all Americans who support a political rival.




The questions stand, though I completely understand why you refuse to answer them, they were intended to be uncomfortable for you since you can't give an honest answer to either that fits with your previously stated 'beliefs'.





"This has nothing to do with Russia and Ukraine"

This is the "Is conflict preferable to submission?" thread and russia's violent insistence on forcing Ukraine to submit to russia's insane demands is a perfect example, nice try.

a reply to: greendust

resistance is not always futile, and sometimes necessary. sometimes it succeeds, others it doesn't.

problem comes in knowing when it's the right time to do so. when you are a few, your more than likely to fail, than if you have larger numbers.

pick your battles wisely.

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: greendust

pick your battles wisely.

Absolutely.

But never, ever forget the Chamberlain lesson.

The cost of doing that again could be as high as the immediate end of humanity.



Not an exaggeration.

This time the madman has thousands of nukes.

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
First, acknowledge your own weaknesses.

Be assured that your opposition has studied them extensively.

Might I suggest; paranoia?

Maybe the only ones left without a little tinge of paranoia, are the blissfully blind ?

They™ know more about us, that most of our loved-ones.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

You're reading into it what you want it to mean -- that's for sure.

Better assessment: The Speech No President Should Have to Give

www.theatlantic.com...

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

You're reading into it what you want it to mean -- that's for sure.

You're talking to that mirror again.

Funny though.




Even biden gave up on defending his speech.

That TDS must be pretty painful, hope someone creates a vaccine for it soon.