It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kenny2xx
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kenny2xx
Weird way to not answer my question.
AR bans?
mag restrictions?
age restrictions?
carry restrictions?
I will just be honest with you I haven’t put that much thought in it to give you a clear answer on how I feel about those specific questions. I thought you meant in general. I would need to do more research and think more before I could really give you a true answer to your specific question. Those are great questions and I would like to be more prepared to answer you.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Here’s the deets,
No down payment
No credit score, phone and insurance payment is enough
No mortgage insurance
Have to be Black or Hispanic…
Hmmm what happened to all those equal housing requirements? Did we not learn what happened in 2008 giving people mortgages that couldn’t pay! I guess they want that to happen again. Looks like another disaster we will all be paying for.
What about Poor White and Asian people? I guess they don’t count and don’t deserve affordable housing.
originally posted by: rickymouse
That kind of sounds like racism to me. Giving any ethnic group extra incentives is racism.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
a reply to: Magnivea
I do. You have Asians, Indigenous, Indians, and immigrants, as well as Caucasians being overlooked. So someone from one of these groups will likely raise issue. And with competent lawyers, the law is on their side.
Here is my guess, their “rules” are probably written in a way that those other races aren’t necessarily excluded but they aren’t encouraged either and I doubt they would actually get these types of loans. Similar to how scholarships work. This is specifically targeting two groups, Black and Hispanics in predominantly black and Hispanic neighborhoods.
originally posted by: Kenny2xx
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kenny2xx
How do you feel about guns and gun control?
I’m not some democrats shill over here. Blacks actually have conservative views and lean more republican. It’s the older generation that votes democrats. But everyone should own a. Gun legally for protection against losers who would steal and take if they didn’t have protection.
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: Thrumbo
This is all about equity.
I doubt it is about buying a house within the these urban city limits, and more about buying in certain suburbs.
originally posted by: KTemplar
a reply to: Bloodworth
Disability?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: marg6043
Here's the beauty of it:
Since this sub-prime program is racially targeted only certain racial groups will get disproportionately affected when it fails as we all know it likely will. Then because we all know those are historically oppressed and disadvantaged groups. Activists can charge racism when they fail because they had bad terms ... but they were the only ones allowed those bad terms to begin with because anyone else was discriminated against in the program!
/facepalm
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
a reply to: Magnivea
I do. You have Asians, Indigenous, Indians, and immigrants, as well as Caucasians being overlooked. So someone from one of these groups will likely raise issue. And with competent lawyers, the law is on their side.
Here is my guess, their “rules” are probably written in a way that those other races aren’t necessarily excluded but they aren’t encouraged either and I doubt they would actually get these types of loans. Similar to how scholarships work. This is specifically targeting two groups, Black and Hispanics in predominantly black and Hispanic neighborhoods.