It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mrthunker
you should have just posted “derp”
originally posted by: Lysergic
So who is winning?
Has anyone changed anyones mind yet?
Does everyone still believe the same things before going into the thread?
Yeah.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
There are no winners on this forum regardless of the matter being debated or the most popularly voted comments. Have a cookie for your contribution 🍪
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: tanstaafl
I don't know why you guys are so fixed on mutation? That's not really what anybody is saying.
originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: Randyvine2
Definite adaptive changes due to environment. Crazy how lack of predation has relatively quick results.
I'm actually curious what other answer there could be for Island Syndrome besides natural selection?
So reverse to you. Best argument explaining Island Syndrome that removes natural selection.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: tanstaafl
Well it looks like Nature didn't care what you think can or can't happen. It did.
Not saying that each bigger step didn't require some 'additional encouragement'.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: tanstaafl
Well it looks like Nature didn't care what you think can or can't happen. It did.
Not saying that each bigger step didn't require some 'additional encouragement'.
'Additional encouragement' is the only thing that could explain one species mutating into another.
There are stories about the possibility of alien genetic manipulation in our ancient past to mutate neanderthal into homo sapiens.
Maybe - just maybe - such genetic manipulation could eventually produce such a result, MAYBE. But 'natural selection? Trillions of identical RANDOM variations occurring SIMULTANEOUSLY in a large number of the same species, enough to result in becoming a permanent change to the entire species?
Again, that is just as (if not more) preposterous as the story of Creation.
** And if you want to retain divinity you can marvel even more at the almighty power to program a universe to go from inflation to stellar formation to organic life clinging to balls of dirt everywhere.
The problem lies with common people not getting all the information. That results in a "general consensus" of the public and then, GL applying common sense against mob rule. Maybe human nature evolved that way..... Lol.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: tanstaafl
It could be more preposterous but since that isn't what happens in evolution we don't need to worry about it.
originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: tanstaafl
Amino acids were found in a comets tail. Confirmed panspermia.
Thaty's my big problem with evilution. It can be oh so subtle just like the
serpant.