It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What they said was not studied.

page: 2
21
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 30 2022 @ 02:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: FamCore




You forget that the clot-shot manufacturers are immune to lawsuits from the public?


They are not immune to the 2nd Amendment.

P


right!

that's why they always get killed by the end of the movie!




posted on Aug, 30 2022 @ 05:56 PM
link   
a reply to: incoserv

Well, it seems that the UK Government might not be recommending the shot to pregnant women anymore.A bit late in the day when all the damage is done. This sums up this episode entirely when everyone has been shot up. www.bitchute.com...



posted on Aug, 30 2022 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
Here we have the reasons why the spike protein is most likely to accumulate in an unborn female's ovaries. The reason is that the Nanoparticles can get through the placental barrier as well as the blood-brain barrier. I think we can assume that the endometrium on the uterine wall is being affected, and here a pathologist explains the reason why. At some stage, this must be seen as grievous bodily harm and subject to simple criminal law.. www.bitchute.com...


Nonsensical post.

People who catch covid develop immunity to the spike protein and there is no evidence it affects fertility.



posted on Aug, 30 2022 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: littlecorn

You're the one who made a nonsensical statement. If you catch covid, you have immunity anyway and don't need a Synthetic spike protein. How about some proof?



posted on Aug, 31 2022 @ 03:42 AM
link   
a reply to: littlecorn

There is no evidence that it does effect fertility or doesn't........because no studies have been completed.

According to this (August 16 2022):

The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need. In principle, a decision on licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available.



In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern.

Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech - GOV.UK
www.gov.uk... tech-covid-19-vaccine

Go right to the bottom of the page in link to read it for yourself.

edit on 31-8-2022 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2022 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Turns out that the page in the link cannot be found now.

Strange.



new topics

top topics
 
21
<< 1   >>

log in

join