WEF Managing Director Railing Against Conspiracy Theorists

I found this rant today to be quite amusing and imagine there are some on here who would be interested in reading the managing director of the WEF's angry rant.
www.theglobeandmail.com...
I'll list some examples of adjectives and words he used to describe anyone who dares to question the WEF's role in world affairs and its support of the phrase "Own Nothing Be Happy"

antisemitic extremists conservative fringe state-sponsored actors anonymous dark web Russian propaganda campaign disinformation far-right outrage domestic extremism bots far-right, Holocaust-denying cohort warped imagination of conspiracy and fringe groups antisemitic and far-right origins trolling misinformation threaten the foundations of democracy malicious or manipulative demonstrable and significant public harm

The conclusion is especially ridiculous:

It also highlights how misinformation derails free speech. At the request of Ms. Auken, the Forum removed all media around her piece because of the online abuse and threats she had faced. Action to prevent lies being accepted as truth can help avoid similar situations and promote genuine free speech, allowing us all to freely exchange ideas and opinions.

You know, I just have to stop there. This guy first of all misrepresented the WEF's interest in the phrase "Own Nothing, Be Happy," claiming the sole appearance as the original article "thought piece," but never addressing why the WEF seemed so interested in that phrase that it used it as one of 8 predictions for year 2030.
Take a look at the "opinion" yourself to see all of those smear words in context, but it's clear that the ol WEF is not comfortable with the scrutiny!

I

The Alex Jones affair was all about opening the door; now there will be nonstop hammering on a need to control 'disinformation' by MSM. Surface Dwellers ( those who rely on the evening news to tell them what they should think and believe) will never challenge the narrative or look at all the facts and consequences.

There aren't a whole lot of places to get uncensored information left, and our controllers will do everything possible to convince citizens we desperately need them to control information-for the good of all.

a reply to: nugget1

Always for the DoublePLUSgood for all!! And if you don't agree, you're a domestic terrorist.

a reply to: nugget1

I made a thread on that very topic some people in here dont understand the dangers around that verdict.
If they can take down AJ for those SH statements.

You would see some RINOs going after anyone questioning the war in Iraq, among other topics..

They have to censor or control all information or it won't work. Orwellian to say the least.

a reply to: zosimov

Rather amusing how the article says that the path to free speech is censorship.

a reply to: zosimov

I think my signature says it all.

For those who can't read it, it says;

I have a right to offend.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Its interesting that the WEF Managing Director is going agaisnt CTs, despite the fact their leader had said that there would be angry agaisnt the WEF in the near future due to their idiotic polices if not agenda.

In Canada's parliament you wont have an answer to your question whatever or not anyone in the parliament is a member of WEF.

just wat i thought evryone knows their deal the corrupt nazis arent happy are they? GOOD they wont be happy in jail for the rest opf their lives neither trust me they didnt expect for the world to find out their plans but we did and i bet they are being harresed and threaTHENED EVRYWHERE THEY TURN LIKE IT SHOULD BE

a reply to: zosimov

We need a Ministry Of Truth & Censorship to ensure the citizens do not get the the truth, I mean disinformation.

Oh, wait, didn't they try that recently?

a reply to: zosimov

When you try to be a Bond villain but they cast you in an Austin Powers movie instead.

You would've thought the world (economic) forum would have a budget for a marketing department but no here's our latest unpolished turd and boy it's a whopper!

Und you vill svallow eet und be happy, oder?

I'd like to see this guy eat a pile of undercooked collard greens.

What I see is a lot of do as I say not as I do. So these bureaucrats, politicians and foundations and organizations could be doing ultra nefarious deeds never to be questioned by anyone. It's Diabolical and pure evil. These people need to go pronto. They are enemies of humanity at this point.

a reply to: zosimov
"the board, which is completely unmoderated, was used by operators of a Russian propaganda campaign"

I'm sorry, perhaps I'm just jaded, but do these idiots really have to keep using the same play, over, and over, and over again? Even the really stupid one's aren't going to fall for that one again. What about those evil princes from Nambia?

There was a recent Joe Scarburro video discussing Kari Lake where he and 2 guests repeated slanders over and over repetitively like; far-right extremists, nutjobs, insurrectionists, rapists, Trumpists, etc etc. No facts just insinuations. How anyone can watch this crap and call it news is beyond me.

The WEF state they have infiltrated governments around the world with their young leaders program (most of the worst ones) and constantly spout ideas that get embraced by governments yet accuse people of ill intent for pointing out the problems of their grand illusions. This is the definition of chutzpah, arrogance and imperiousness.

a reply to: zosimov

What fools so many have been. We were punked by an antisemite who put his own hateful spin on an innocent Lennonesque pondering of how wonderful and fair our future could be - imagining no possessions but sharing all the world.

Damn him! Damn him to hell! I feel used.

As one of the commentors pointed out on the website beneath the article, there is no attempt to actually explain the rationale behind the assertion that we will own nothing & be happy. Neither is there any attempt to provide a solution to the alleged misinformation, aside from 'censor them', in essence.

No questions answered, shoot the messenger, tie it all to the right wing, rather than the massive amount of ordinary people who didn't like the sound of 'owning nothing & being happy about it'. Just a typical hatchet job, as one would expect from these insidious monsters.

Comment by 'Cooke V' on Globe & Mail site:

Instead of repudiating and condemning this odious topic, we have a managing director of the WEF using a national media platform to "shoot the messenger". This whole article focusses on smearing fringe groups for spotting and promulgating this phrase, to the point that it enters the mainstream.

No explanation is provided as to what the WEF's thinking was behind the phrase. Here are some questions I have that I was hoping the WEF would have answered:

- If I "own nothing", who will own the stuff that I rent?
- Who will choose those owners? How will they be chosen?
- How is this different from the socialism that was tried in the USSR, North Korea and Cuba?
- Does the WEF still believe it?

Regardless that the fringe 4chan or other message boards got this out into the public, they were only the messengers. This topic originated from the brain trust within the WEF. They own it, and still have to explain it. Not attempt to bury it from the public.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
The original article, along with the explanation from the author added later because people were not getting it, was a critique of a system like that, in the style of 1984 and Brave New World.

It was supposed to spur the reader to question if that is the kind of world they would like to live in. Instead it went over people's heads.

a reply to: daskakik

Yes, I addressed the original article in OP and read it too. How about the WEF picking it up as one out of 8 predictions for 2030 and making a fancy little video about it.

That pedestrian article didn't go over anyone's head.

a reply to: zosimov
What about it? It doesn't change the original intent of the article. The post I replied to was asking about the rationale behind the article and that is what I addressed.