Covid Vaccines Are Killing One in Every 800 Over 60

Dr. Theo Schetters, a doctor who has had a lead role in the development of many vaccines says the COVID vaccines should be withdrawn immediately. He calculates 1 in 800 over 60 are dying almost immediately and that is only in the short term after vaccination. The more vaccines you give out, the more deaths you have full stop. This is captured in all cause mortality as well. When you take all cause mortality, which is increased dramatically, and subtract any reported COVID deaths, you are still left with dramatically more deaths over a multi year average. From July 15-July 22nd in England this equates to 1,217 deaths above average in a single week (subtracting COVID deaths).

This report from Dr. Schetters follows on the heels of the Israeli director of vaccine research who has blown the whistle on his side effects from the vaccine and the utter failure of the vaccination campaign for which he got locked out of twitter.

Dr. Theo Schetters, a vaccinologist based in the Netherlands who has played a leading role in the development of a number of vaccines, has analysed the official data from the Dutch Government and found a very close correlation between when fourth vaccine doses were administered in the country and the number of excess deaths, as shown in the chart below.

Dr. Schetters, who is a recipient of the Medal of Honour of the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Montpellier in France, told Dr. Robert Malone, an inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, that medical doctors are currently seeing “all sorts of symptoms that they do not know what it is” and that “in the Netherlands now it’s very clear that there is a good correlation between the number of vaccinations that are given to people and the number of people that die within a week after that”. It is essential to look at all-cause mortality, he said, as the vaccine “potentially affects all organs”.

So let’s say in this week we gave 10,000 vaccinations. Then in this week, we have something like 125 excess in death in that week.

SOURCE - INTERVIEW

DAILY SCEPTIC - SOURCE ARTICLE

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

So, all other deaths, for all other reasons except COVID-19, are entirely due only to the vaccines?

How about the rise in deaths for all other reasons being due to a change in the availability of medical services to the demographic (who are highly dependent upon those services), because health services are overloaded dealing with COVID-19 cases?

In fact, what in these statistics specifically identifies the vaccines as cause?

The author.

Argh! I see your error! You have been misidentifying with and of for a while now, must be your compreeehension.


a reply to: chr0naut

originally posted by: Dalamax
The author.

Argh! I see your error! You have been misidentifying with and of for a while now, must be your compreeehension.

a reply to: chr0naut

I am using the best figures that I have to go on, the official government compiled ones. If you have better statistics, then post them. And the same official statistics are at the core of the original source for the OP. If I'm wrong, they are wrong.

Perhaps you should review your use of a completely debunked argument that related only to the US situation 3 years ago?

originally posted by: Dalamax
The author.

Argh! I see your error! You have been misidentifying with and of for a while now, must be your compreeehension.


a reply to: chr0naut

Here's what Dr. Theo Schetters actually said in his interview:

"If I see these correlations, although I cannot prove causality at the moment, from a precautionary measure, you should say let's stop this."

He flat out says he cannot prove causality.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: Dalamax
The author.

Argh! I see your error! You have been misidentifying with and of for a while now, must be your compreeehension.


a reply to: chr0naut

Here's what Dr. Theo Schetters actually said in his interview:

"If I see these correlations, although I cannot prove causality at the moment, from a precautionary measure, you should say let's stop this."

He flat out says he cannot prove causality.

Nobody said they have prove of casuality for anything. Where did anyone say that? This is the lamest argument ever.

We are operating on correlations and if you can't put 2 and 2 together you become a Darwin award.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Its your own personal experience that will be the Litmus test. I have been watching previously really healthy people in my circle. So far we have one bowel cancer one lung cancer and one heart attack, That's the father daughter and son. It could be some genes are sensitive to the spike protein and if you have them you could be impacted. In the nonfamily a sixteen-year-old kid with myocarditis. If they don't pull this poison soon someone will do it for them.

If true (probably not), that number is magnitudes lower than the mortality rate of covid in people 60+.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: Dalamax
The author.

Argh! I see your error! You have been misidentifying with and of for a while now, must be your compreeehension.


a reply to: chr0naut

Here's what Dr. Theo Schetters actually said in his interview:

"If I see these correlations, although I cannot prove causality at the moment, from a precautionary measure, you should say let's stop this."

He flat out says he cannot prove causality.

Nobody said they have prove of casuality for anything. Where did anyone say that? This is the lamest argument ever.

We are operating on correlations and if you can't put 2 and 2 together you become a Darwin award.

The OP states:

"Covid Vaccines Are Killing One in Every 800 Over 60". That is quite obviously a statement of causality. Did you miss that part?

If you are unaware of the time-honored statement "correlation does not imply causation" then you might qualify for the Darwin Award.

a reply to: LordAhriman

If true (probably not), that number is magnitudes lower than the mortality rate of covid in people 60+.

The only problem with this line of reasoning is that the entire population was not mandated to catch covid.

My favorite response, "B-b-b-ut our computer model shows we saved millions of lives."

I posted a study on here not long ago showing clearly in the Pfizer trial that for every person saved from hospital due to covid, 5 more were put in for adverse reactions. That is from the trial that was supposed to wrap up in a few months, but has now been kicked further down the road into 2024.

Adverse events surpass risk reduction by 5:1

originally posted by: LordAhriman
If true (probably not), that number is magnitudes lower than the mortality rate of covid in people 60+.

I don't know how it is in the Netherlands, but in the US, a 1 in 800 chance of dying within any given week is about the expectation value for an 81 year old male, according to the actuarial tables. The analysis Dr. Schetters did lumps in everyone over 60 years old which of course includes all those over 81 years old, for which the risk of dying within a one week period would be even worse. One would need to know what the average expectation value for dying within a given week is for the entire group of 60+ year olds in order to know if a 1 in 800 risk rises above the background level.

originally posted by: Zenchuck
a reply to: The only problem with this line of reasoning is that the entire population was not mandated to catch covid.

Nor were they mandated to get the vaccine.

Chances are, everyone will get covid. I thought I was invincible to it, till I wasn't a few weeks ago.

So far my grandparents have been very lucky. They're 84 and 90 and haven't caught it yet. They recently moved to an assisted living facility because grandma has dementia, and 6 people there have it right now. I'm scared for them.

a reply to: chr0naut

In fact, what in these statistics specifically identifies the vaccines as cause?

A doctor and a GD virologist you forever un reasonable sceptic.



This woman Tiffany Dover died from the get go. And still you believe
what the cover up enables you to believe. Even in the face of all
the evidence and obvious cover ups ever since. Because of only
one thing. Your ego!

I just want you to answer one simple question please. Yes or no.

Do you even believe depopulation is something the people running
this world would attempt?

What is it with you constantly posting 24/7 doom vaxx porn?

We aren't all dying.

Give it up, mate?

a reply to: LordAhriman

Nor were they mandated to get the vaccine.

If we can't agree that there was enormous social pressure - including loss of jobs due to vaccine mandates. If we can't agree on that simple historically accurate and verifiable fact of recent history - there is not much hope for an honest discussion.

originally posted by: Zenchuck
If we can't agree that there was enormous social pressure - including loss of jobs due to vaccine mandates. If we can't agree on that simple historically accurate and verifiable fact of recent history - there is not much hope for an honest discussion.

How many 60+ year olds were working jobs that would have had a vaccine mandate?

Hell, I work for one of the largest corporations in the world, and it was never mandated for any of us millions of employees. It was mandated for top level management (corporate office), but that's it.

So no, the entire population was not mandated to get a vaccine. Not even close.

Tiffany dover also died after being vaccinated and they tried to cover it up.

originally posted by: Randyvine2
This woman Tiffany Dover died from the get go.

No. She didn't. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

Tiffany dover also died after being vaccinated and they tried to cover it up.