It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Until oil was discovered , having children was based on what the land could provide for the raising of children.
originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: InwardDiver
I, personally, don't see anything nefarious in the GGS. Is it possible, yes, but it's not my perspective.
so you don't see anything wrong with a group deciding who can and can't have children, where they can live, speak only one language, rule your religion as to how much you can believe or live your life by it.
that's not freedom, of course most of the world doesn't really have real freedom. but they have more than the guide stones would have let them have.
originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: InwardDiver
I, personally, don't see anything nefarious in the GGS. Is it possible, yes, but it's not my perspective.
so you don't see anything wrong with a group deciding who can and can't have children, where they can live, speak only one language, rule your religion as to how much you can believe or live your life by it.
that's not freedom, of course most of the world doesn't really have real freedom. but they have more than the guide stones would have let them have.
originally posted by: VierEyes
I'm very surprised they knocked down the remainder of it. It shows zero respect for the thing and the message.
Proof that reason is not something people are interested in pursuing.
originally posted by: lostgirl
a reply to: Brotherman
Just want to share this blog link for you and projectvxn to discuss:
possible RPG?
The guy makes a pretty good case which includes a couple video 'stills' I hadn't seen anywhere else...I'd be interested to know what you guys think..
originally posted by: GravitySucks
originally posted by: BernnieJGato
Looks like Marjorie Taylor Greene. Does she have an alibi?
A true man of knowledge teaches in riddles & hidden ways .
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: MeatHookReality
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: MeatHookReality
I am an adept Rosicrucian + Confraternity and no Imperator would sign off on a public Rosicrucian monument & there is no Rosicrucian doxology or philosophy that is concerned about how many people should be on Earth .
originally posted by: InwardDiver
a reply to: MeatHookReality
Maybe the Rosicrucians did put the stones up. It doesn't mean they or the stones represent anything nefarious. Rosicrucian teachings emphasize personal growth and moral development. These stones list values of a fair and just society.
If a Rosicrucian member put these up on their property, it would cause them to be defrocked & ousted . 4/3
Are there any connections between the Rosicrucian order and the Comte de Saint Germain?
Comte de Saint Germain was a man made up of mystery. I personally do not own any confraternity on said involvement or absence of activity.
Just like myself… what I say about the RC+C could all be a lie & made up by myself or others .
The Count can be whoever you need him to be .
He was by no means average, but his understanding of his priori knowledge is unknowable due to him being in repose.
Thanks.
I ask only because it's been written that he was, like yourself, a Rosicrucian adept.
However, since you suggest that Rosicrucian adepts should be considered untrustworthy, I'll consider the matter closed until more reliable information presents itself.