It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Isn't it a sign of being secure in your sexuality that you can accept criticism around and engage with it, not attack and shout it down?
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
what, no pennies? why?
a reply to: AccessDenied
originally posted by: fastzombie
Over the past few years I'm noticing this trend that to not be in total lock step on an aspect of LGBTQ discussion is to open yourself up to accusations of internalised homophobia and being a dupe for the far right. Groups such as the LGB Alliance - who broke away from Stonewall because they felt the LGB was being sidelined by the TQ - are labelled as hate groups. On a personal level I was hounded out of a discussion forum by a radical queer contingent who took exception to my having my own difference of opinion - often quite trivial at that. I've noticed a similar trend around racial issues and people from ethnic groups being labelled uncle toms etc. I'm just wondering how many intersectional boxes do you have to tick before you're allowed to challenge, be critical or disagree without character assassination in train. Or is that the whole point. No amount of boxes can justify it. I can't believe that many many within the gay community aren't alarmed by the radical path we seem to be going down and the way that the vocal minority has somehow come to dominate the field so much it gets to create the rules of discourse. Isn't it a sign of being secure in your sexuality that you can accept criticism around and engage with it, not attack and shout it down?
originally posted by: chris_stibrany
what, no pennies? why?
a reply to: AccessDenied