-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions ---SHALL WE PLAY A GAME ONCE MORE?--- -Part- --41--

originally posted by: tallcool1

originally posted by: duncanhidao
👀

Kevin Corke himself replied to the whole "Q" pin thingy saying it's just his Harvard pin on his lapel opening and not a "Q" pin.

Exactly, He knows what he's doing.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Justoneman
None of the examples given seem to have shaken the control the DS has.

Don't make me laugh.

China looks to launch liquid propellant rockets from the seas

TALLINN, Estonia — Chinese state-owned and commercial companies are developing capabilities to launch liquid propellant rockets from sea platforms to boost the country’s launch options.

China has already demonstrated the ability to launch the Long March 11 solid rocket from sea platforms. These have been facilitated by a new spaceport near Haiyang in the eastern coastal province of Shandong.

Now, private firms including Orienspace and the state-owned China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT) are developing larger, liquid propellant Gravity series rockets and adapted Long March 8 launchers for sea launches.

“This breakthrough in sea launch technology will enable China to launch medium and large satellites and constellations ‘both on land and sea’, especially into low-inclination low-Earth orbits, and it allows China to remain competitive in the fast-paced space industry,” a 2021 paper in the Chinese Journal of Aeronautics states.

How many off-shore oil platforms turned rocket platforms has Elon purchased/built?

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk recently announced the company is building Deimos and Phobos launch platforms in the ocean by 2022.

Former Deepwater drill rigs named after Mars moons, Phobos "fear and panic" and Deimos "terror and dread".

"In April 2009, Michael S. Malone revealed, while interviewing Elon Musk, that the two had a bet that SpaceX would put a man on Mars by "2020 or 2025". Musk has continued to reiterate this rough timeframe since. This countdown clock expires on 1 January 2026, at 00:00 UTC. No pressure, Elon." SpaceX Stats


twitter.com...

Dream big or go home...The plan, according to Musk, is simple. SpaceX will build and launch thousands of Starships to Mars in the modern-day equivalent of Noah's ark. In his words:


twitter.com...

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: carewemust

A sad day when we have to learn of a Q post from the CNN clip that FlyingFox shared. 

I posted the drop here within minutes of when Q made it at 2 o'clock in the morning.

The thread isn't as populated as it was in 2020, which is probably how I missed you alerting us to Q's post late Tuesday night. Was simply lamenting how a Q post generated an easy 2 pages of discussions and analysis in the good old days (pre Nov 2020).

originally posted by: doobydoll
a reply to: FlyingFox

How about....Trump gave them the rope to hang themselves

Absolutely correct. It's all about 'choices'.

They have to have opportunities to do the Right thing, as there are to do the wrong thing.
Remove restrictions/rules that force them to be fair. Open all the paths to both Right and wrong and see for yourselves in real life, that which they choose to do of their own free Will.

But some still don't/won't/can't see it. Some are blaming President Trump for giving them the freedom to choose between doing Right and wrong. They're saying ''they only did wrong because Trump allowed them to'', without considering the fact that besides being free to do the wrong thing, they were/are also free to do the Right thing, but chose not to.

They are still free to choose to do the Right thing, At any time. They just don't want to.

Have a good weekend everyone.

DD

originally posted by: CrazyFox
a reply to: Grenade
artemis

NASA announced that the rocket and crawler left the launch pad at 4:12 a.m. ET this morning, Saturday, July 2, and that it was scheduled to arrive at the building later this morning. 

Unrelated

edit on 2022/7/2 by CrazyFox because:

I replied in my friend CWM's great thread on abortion and killed it - the thread that is. HERE for those interested on why idiots like this have zero clue as to what any of this means.

originally posted by: PeteMitchell
As far as gold goes. What is the intrinsic value of it? Gold is only worth something because of its social construction.
AFAIK it’s not “needed” for rare earth industrial use. Sure it used to back fiat currency, but what peon today or in the “end times” would rather have a few crumbs of gold vs a few hundred rounds, a few bags of wheat/flour, and some type of fix (whether it’s caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, tobacco, etc)

This has been asked often. The issue is that gold was valued by other, more advanced races, in the past. At this point it has been ingrained in us, and, as this point, we cannot escape it. Just impossible.

Consider the same thing that has happened with "The Dollar" over the last 100 years. We value everything in dollars, no matter what it is, and this means it cannot be released, or replaced, within the collective at this point either.

Gold's value, isn't really in usage, because countries store/hoard/transfer gold, they don't use it up in products. So there is gold as representation/store of value, and there is spot market gold for use, and the values are not related in a 1:1.

So, since our collective DNA agrees that gold has value, enough to make other value based on it, it will be here in that form for a while, even if it doesn't serve us well.

Fun fact, most of the gold on earth is surface gold, likely arriving here through the destruction of Tiamat, the asteroid belt.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: carewemust

A sad day when we have to learn of a Q post from the CNN clip that FlyingFox shared. 

I posted the drop here within minutes of when Q made it at 2 o'clock in the morning.

The thread isn't as populated as it was in 2020, which is probably how I missed you alerting us to Q's post late Tuesday night. Was simply lamenting how a Q post generated an easy 2 pages of discussions and analysis in the good old days (pre Nov 2020).

Yeah, I think most people are just ready for it to wrap up. It's to the point now where people are expecting happenings and Q's return, while awesome, is hopefully signifying the beginning of the happenings. Ready for events.

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Don't make me laugh.

Vaccine avoidance is off the charts.

67% of the worlds population has at least 1 jab. Not sure what charts you are looking at.

Their deepest secrets are known...

Like that means anything.

...and revenue streams cut off.

You sure about that?

Ukraine, their piggybank, is out-of-business.

Pretty sure they have more than just Ukraine to dip into. Like drugs, both legal and illegal. Did people all of a sudden stop paying taxes?

Pead0s are locked up too.

Some have always been locked up, that doesn't mean there are not more out there.

But, you can laugh if you want to.

a reply to: daskakik

a reply to: FlyingFox
Is that you on the right starting off a post with "I believe the DS's plans have been shredded..." because a minority refuses the vax, there is some dirt on a couple of people, one revenue source was cut off and GMax (1 person) was sentenced?

That equals 4.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: FlyingFox
Is that you on the right starting off a post with "I believe the DS's plans have been shredded..." because a minority refuses the vax, there is some dirt on a couple of people, one revenue source was cut off and GMax (1 person) was sentenced?

That equals 4.

So ... because a minority refuses the vax, ... That's 1

there is some dirt on a couple of people, ... That's 2 people making the total 3

one revenue source was cut off ... 4

and GMax (1 person) was sentenced? ... 5

That equals 4.

I got 5 from your statements.

You are not blind ... you simply refuse to see the truth ... or ... your job is on the line.

Check your pants and keep a fire extingwisher next to you


P

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: tanstaafl

Context, context. I clearly meant it wasn't a thing legally, and you know it, because my response was to what you said, the context of which was the legal concept that Trump's FCC did away with

BS you had no idea as you were trying to debate that net neutrality principles was something new.
Irregardless my points stand.

How about....Trump gave them the rope to hang themselves

SCOTUS’s latest decision could hinder Democrats’ effort to reinstate net neutrality rules

thehill.com...
thehill.com/policy/technology/3544328-how-scotuss-latest-decision-could-hinder-democrats-effort-to-reinstate-net-neutrality-rules/

The Supreme Court’s ruling to curb the power of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could hurt Democrats’ long-fought battle to reinstate Obama-era net neutrality rules.

If the same principle is applied from the majority opinion in Thursday’s case, arguing that Congress must grant clear authorization for certain regulations, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) may not be able to restore rules banning service providers from blocking or throttling websites.

originally posted by: pheonix358
I got 5 from your statements.

But it was 4 statements.

4 statements that made FF come to the conclusion that the DS's plans are shredded.

4 rather meaningless statements, in the grand scheme of things.

a reply to: FlyingFox

I thought the term being used these days is Malinformation. Has it gone back to mis information again, and can Miss. Information still run for Miss. America this year?

I think we should get a petition going that shows how Miss. Information is being discriminated against by not allowing her to compete in the Beauty Pageants. I truly wonder how many people would sign that.

FF, Dask picked the Sun Tzu memes to say no example has shaken the control the DS has?
How ironic that is to me.

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Justoneman
None of the examples given seem to have shaken the control the DS has.

Don't make me laugh.

originally posted by: Justoneman
FF, Dask picked the Sun Tzu memes to say no example has shaken the control the DS has?
How ironic that is to me.

Actually, I didn't choose them. They were just part of the post you said I should take note of.

The memes are neither here nor there.

a reply to: daskakik

The memes are neither here nor there.

Well, what else could you have said?

Lol.

It is always only you who is correct, never ever anyone else.

But then, in another reply, many moons ago, you did speaketh truth, when you said, "I am here for the S&Gs."

P

originally posted by: pheonix358
It is always only you who is correct, never ever anyone else.

Well, the post was referring to why I chose to reply to a post. It was one directed at me that quoted FF's post. I didn't choose for JOM to quote that post and include those memes.

I addressed FF's statements and didn't even bother to look at the memes.

a reply to: daskakik

"Commander Spock" to Cpt Dask: "Our deflector shields are operating at maximum capacity Cpt!"

Off in the weeds again I see. Well, come out and join us please.