It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theatreboy
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ChiefD
So, they aren't sending them? It was all a lie?
No. They were coming. But these caravans hurt the lefts chances in November so they will stop for a while.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: theatreboy
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ChiefD
So, they aren't sending them? It was all a lie?
No. They were coming. But these caravans hurt the lefts chances in November so they will stop for a while.
way to spoil it early. I wanted to hear all about freedom and my privilege.
No. They were coming. But these caravans hurt the lefts chances in November so they will stop for a while.
originally posted by: theatreboy
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ChiefD
So, they aren't sending them? It was all a lie?
No. They were coming. But these caravans hurt the lefts chances in November so they will stop for a while.
The U.S. fertility rate hit a record low in 2020 — just as it did in 2019, and 2018. Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.
The latter number is what social scientists and policymakers have long regarded as the rate a country should maintain to keep population numbers stable. When the fertility rate falls below replacement level, the population grows older and shrinks, which can slow economic growth and strain government budgets. Today’s babies are tomorrow’s workers and taxpayers
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: theatreboy
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ChiefD
So, they aren't sending them? It was all a lie?
No. They were coming. But these caravans hurt the lefts chances in November so they will stop for a while.
No, Trump said they (assumedly Mexico, or some South American government) were sending them.
It's mind boggling how the Mexican immigration authorities were able to do this
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: ChiefD
I blame biden for that caravan dissolving. It happened on his watch after all.
originally posted by: ChiefD
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ChiefD
So, they aren't sending them? It was all a lie?
I don’t know. I was just surprised at how the Mexican immigration authorities were able to disperse that many people. It seems really strange.
originally posted by: randomthoughts12
a reply to: ChiefD
This should show us all a lot actually. Diverted and seperated into smaller groups is more likely.