It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has indicated that his country will not sign the World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty. In effect, he was saying that Brazil is refusing to transfer its sovereignty to the globalist institution. “Brazil is not going to sign this [WHO pandemic treaty]. Brazil is autonomous," Bolsonaro told the assembled journal on Thursday. “Brazil is autonomous and does not enter into [this treaty]. You can forget that.” “If this proposal goes through, it will happen without Brazil,” the president stressed. He reminded the media that he was one of the only world leaders to refuse to impose unscientific lockdowns.
“I said we should care about the elderly and people with underlying suffering and now studies from outside Brazil show I was right,” Bolsonaro said. And which Brazilian state went into lockdown the most? Sao Paulo. Which state had the highest death rate per 100,000 people? Sao Paulo. That shows I was right," he added. Brazil has also said 'no' to the WEF's Great Reset. Earlier, Bolsonaro confronted WHO chief Tedros with the fact that many people get corona and die after the second dose of the corona vaccine. Health Minister Ernst Kuipers says in a letter to parliament that the substantive preparation of the negotiation process for the pandemic treaty is currently taking place. “As soon as the contours of this treaty become visible, I will inform the House,” Kuipers writes.
originally posted by: nugget1
I would expect to see the citizens of Brazil infiltrated with insurgents in much the same way Ukraine was, unless time restraints demand Bolsonaro be removed quickly due to 'ill health'.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Salander
Self sufficient to the point that WHO and affiliated NATO agencies have to be very, very persuasive to get any resources or cooperation from the US and there's no meaningful retaliation if we politely refuse.
Good Wish our so called illegitimate 'president' would have a backbone and a moral compass against his diaper handlers
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: nugget1
I would suggest his security is top-notch.Almost to the point that anyone having a go would be signing their death warrant.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: TzarChasm
Not sure of your point. Self sufficient in what area?
WHO has been shown to be a criminal organization, apparently serving at the pleasure of Gates, GAVI and WEF.
We don't need to be involved with those crooks. Any treaty Sleepy Joe signs will be null and void.
originally posted by: pheonix358
Smart move by a politician, get votes via patriotism.
Smart move by a great statesman.
Smart move by a slimy statesman.
And now, it would almost be impossible to undo this by a future Govt.
I really don't know anything about this guy but top move.
We may see other leaders take the same posture for the same reasons, they are not all held in great esteem by the public.
P
originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: Sander1976
The media will rapidly convert him into a Russian sympathiser because of BRICS, and Brazil will be next up for Regime Change Bingo.