Did Isaiah Prophecy Jesus as Lucifer?

a reply to: WalkingHolic

You are on the right path, but your are wasting time analysing the veil translations. They are not correctly translated. They are not even close to correct

I'll give you a few things to consider that will help you, if you are interested

1) Not only are the English translations incorrect. The original Hebrew and Greek translations are also corrupt

2) There are no "names" used in the correctly translated Bible. It is a compendium of important information about how the world works. Not stories about people

Wherever a persons name is used, you need to translate it as a word, not a persons name

For instance; Samuel means "Emotions"

Every time you read the name in the Bible, you need to translate it as "Emotion", not as a person named Samuel

The same mistake has been made with all mythology, not just the Bible

The Egyptian "Thoth", the Norse "Thor" and the Greek New Testament "Theos" (which is meant to mean "God"), all mean "Thought"

They don't refer to a particular person or entity, they refer to the character trait

"El'ohim" is "Equilibrium", not "God"

It is all physics

3) The words within the Greek and Hebrew language have been corrupted within their use in the Bible

For example, the word "Kakos", said to mean "Evil", actually means "Conclude/End"

You need to correlate the Biblical stories with the older mythologies in order to find what they are trying to teach about how the world works

It is all allegory, written by people who didn't understand the original wisdom they were trying to translate

The best example of this is that Revelation is a book about Frequency, Resonance and Spectrum. It is physics. Detailing the 7 tones of the octaves

Mark of the beast is literally resonant frequency, or "key signature"

Beast out of the earth is the timing and cycle of the frequency

"Two witnesses" explains principles of "Harmony"

"Two witnesses killed and raised" explains the difference between "minor and major" harmony. Hence "killed and raised"

My point is, that your are wasting your time arguing the veil translations with Theists

You need to concentrate your efforts on uncovering the root teachings their translations came from

This makes any veil arguments irrelevant and powerless

a reply to: WalkingHolic
Firstly, "morning star" is a title, not a name. Biden and Macron are both called "President", but that doesn't make them the same person. Christ and Herod are both called "king", but that doesn't make them the same person.

On the Isaiah passage, the first rule for understanding thet Bible is "always look at the context". In the first instance, this was a prophecy of hope to a Jerusalem under long-term siege and therefore starving. A child will be born shortly after the time when the prophet was speaking. There is a time-limit, given in the next chapter as "by the time the child learns how to speak", and in this chapter by the words about distinguishing good and evil. Either way, it means "within a year or so". Before that time limit expires, the child will be able to eat curds and honey. That is, FOOD WILL BE AVAILABLE, which is the best kind of prophecy possible for a starving city. For the New Tetament, the child is offering a different kind of hope for a different problem.

a reply to: WalkingHolic

Ok have fun.

Wish you all the best with your writing career.

The first rule about being the anitchrist is you don't talk about being the antichrist.