Kindergartners Sent Home With Masturbation Assignment

originally posted by: jjkenobi
Straight to jail. No exceptions.

Amen 🙏

HI,

I think I found the source material:

Body Smart: Right From the Start

Kindergartners Sent Home With Masturbation Assignment

Not really surprising.

a reply to: frogs453

Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner! Someone who thinks that invasive/intrusive activities with obvious sexual connotations being foisted upon pre-teen children are 'A-Okay' to be pushed by a school teacher.

Okay, Groomer.

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: vNex92

The school didn't kniw the teacher was doing this. The approved program was supposed to be a touch dont touch thing...where students learn about their body parts and what is considered private and not for anyone else to touch. Still sounds pretty early to teach but these days I guess maybe there is reason to teach a 4 year old about such things.

The teacher needs to meet the wood chipper feet first...that way they feel they passing!

Somehow teaching pre-k good touch bad touch to these tiny tots in this teachers head was an appropriate lesson to have them draw a map of the home and mark where the kids could feel their own penises and vulvas if they were in the mood to. Amazing how nothing goes off as she watches that line xerox by over and over lol

Who is doing this!? We can’t just say perverts nor teachers nor politicians...really where is this coming from and who are the people implementing it...where do they find such degenerates?

Now I don't disagree with the goal here, the way its played out is horrendous and I agree, gas up the chipper on this teacher.

I live in BC and this scared me a bit as I have 3 boys under 3, but with that, I was molested when I was a child when I was 4 or 5, I didn't know any better so I didn't say anything. Not until 5 years ago I finally addressed my demons and luckily my wife was so supportive and helped me through the pain.

What i'm saying is I agree with the goal, but the execution was bad in this case. This teacher should lose their job for this to set an example for other teachers who think this might be OK.


a reply to: infolurker

originally posted by: Spacespider
omg.. gotta be some aprils fool joke, I looked for this story elsewhere.. and it is only from the sender "Libs of TikTok" no one else is reporting on the story.

Well if this was true and where my kids was.. I would have called all the other kids parents for a meeting, call the police, the media and the mayor.. I would never ever send my kid to a place like that..

Because they are the ones that broke the story. It's 100% true.

So are they going to let all these teachers that are in Jail for having sex with students out ?

Where is this line being drawn ?

For all those who are asserting this kind of thing is not real and does not happen, I did one search and found more than enough reason to suspect this is real and does happen:

Dalton parents enraged over 'masturbation' videos for first-graders ...

NYC School Teaches First Graders About Masturbation

Clark County parents over the last month have been rising up in anger over potential changes to the Clark County School District’s sex-education program.
Many of the so-called “Developmental Messages” sparked outrage among parents. Some of the suggested messages for “Level 1 – Ages 5—8” students included:

“Touching and rubbing one’s own genitals to feel good is called masturbation,” page 57.

The Illinois governor has signed into law a new bill that promotes “gender identity” to kindergartners, as well as “abortion,” “contraception,” “masturbation,” and “sexual orientation” to children in third through twelfth grade.

There is no valid reason to introduce this subject to a 5 year old. None. Zero. Anyone who does, or agrees with it, is a pedo imo. There is no hell hot enough for you as far as I am concerned.

If you are an adult you can do whatever screwed up sick twisted crap you you want with other adults. Just leave the children alone. May God help you the moment you approach my child with this crap because no one on Earth will be able to.

originally posted by: Brotherman

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: AaarghZombies

when my boy was doing the covid protection class bs he was issued an Ipad to do school work at home in kindergarten and there were lessons that asked him to video things in home and one of those things was where do mommy and daddy go to be alone? and there were other invasive lessons that my boy was supposed to do during some of these "lessons"

If true, then call cops.

He is now in a private school. Cops shouldn’t have 💩 to do with my boys learning at his age. He’s still curious why it’s not snow and it’s rain. He wants to work with animals.

"If" a person asks your child to film what I presume is going to be your bedroom, which is also presumably where you have sex, then this is actually a crime, it's Felony Voyeurism.

Laws vary from state to state but when I live it would equal jail time for the teacher.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
You're reaching for sure. I responded to a parent assuming they want the child to video the parents sexy alone time.

As if a teacher will assume a parent will not have any idea what a 5 year old is doing for homework and assumes it's nefarious.


If the parents alone time is the back deck with a glass of wine in the evening does the kid get an F? I mean really? We don't know they even wanted to film where it is. Maybe they wanted the child to film asking the parent. Or if they are supposed to film it when the child asks, if you don't want to say "in the basement smoking a joint", or if the only alone time you have is in the bedroom having sex then just say "in the kitchen after you're asleep" and film the kitchen or say "when we watch TV" and film the living room watching TV.


Heck if you're really assuming the teacher has an evil intent, guess what, ask the teacher for gosh sakes what the idea behind it is. If you feel it's intrusive tell them so. There is probably context behind the assignment and if you speak to them I'm sure they won't hold the kid from passing kindergarten.

originally posted by: Brotherman
I don’t want to believe the op is actually real but I will say that in them young ass ages they spend a lot of time because classes were limited due to covid their time in class was spent using lessons to teach the kids how to use the iPad issued to them and the lessons often involved voice and video recordings.

If the story the OP is posting isn't real, I can surely say the BOOK she got the lesson from is 100% real so if anything is a lie it would be the teachers giving them the assignment from a real book.

a reply to: frogs453
The situation Brotherman described is indeed reading like an invasion. Specific the "where mommy and daddy go to be alone" could be their BDSM dungeon, their designated pot cave or whatever is none of the business of the teachers. You are right, alone time can be many things and the setting it happens is none of the teachers business.

I get the taste it has, clearly a nosy teacher. These exist, and it's all for the children's good of course. I'd let my daughter record a video from the teachers front door, from my parked car through the windows while we both talk about stuff in his garden and what we like or dislike.

And then I would tell my daughter, when he askes why, to tell him "we like to be noosy".

Of course not... as it would fall back on my daughter for sure...

a reply to: TDDAgain

I get it, but without knowing the full story and just jumping to conclusions it's hard to say.

There are many articles for parents about children from 4-6 needing alone time. Just to decompress. Maybe this evolved into a discussion about all people needing alone time. Maybe it was about alone time for each parent.

Any concern about an assignment, ask the teacher for clarification. Don't just assume it's some dirty reason. Again if you still feel it's intrusive then say that to the teacher.

With kids doing hybrid teachers seem to try to assign things the kids can do in the house and including the parent in a lesson can be a good experience for the kid.

a reply to: TDDAgain

I think you've hit on something.

I can't find it at the moment, but I remember during the "panic plandemic" there was a story about a family who got in trouble because the camera their child used in his room for at home classes caught his BB gun hanging on the wall behind him. The school was claiming it amounted to "bringing a gun to school" because it was visible.

A child's home is their own private space. A teacher has no business getting involved in what a child does, is taught, or experiences at home (with the lone exception of domestic abuse, which requires some sort of evidence beyond "I thought they were being abused"). Teachers are supposed to teach, and public schools where they work are there to teach the basic skills: science, arithmetic, reading, writing, English composition, history, etc. Anything more is abuse of their authority and reason they should be immediately dismissed and blackballed.

I will not go into what should be done to this teacher. I have had much, much more minor issues with "educators" when my kids were in school. One ended up with a principal threatening to call the police. I responded with "How long do you think it'll take them to get here? I guess we need to get started." The police were never called, and that principal changed his mind on the issue immediately.

So readers can use their own imaginations.

There is no wiggle room in these kinds of situations to me as a parent. Teaching is the most noble of professions when done without an ulterior social motive; teaching is the most evil and criminal of professions when done with a social agenda.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
If a child is encouraged or introduced by an adult it's called grooming.

That is not actually the definition of grooming.

Grooming means to manipulate someone in order to have sex with them or have them have sex with others, like a pimp would do.

Telling a child they don't have to feel ashamed for touching themselves isn't the same thing.

a reply to: daskakik
No one needed to tell me.....

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
No one needed to tell me.....

Then why did you use the word grooming incorrectly?

a reply to: frogs453

Maybe...

Maybe...

Maybe if frogs could fly, they wouldn't bump their butts trying to get around.

Any concern about an assignment, ask the teacher for clarification. Don't just assume it's some dirty reason. Again if you still feel it's intrusive then say that to the teacher.

Always good to start by getting to the heart of the issue. But my experience has taught me that every time I thought there was a problem, it turned out to be worse than I thought, not better. Not every complaint a child has about a teacher is legitimate, but since we all went through school ourselves it is usually pretty easy in my experience to know what is just the child not liking something and what is a problem.

There is also the issue of getting to the teacher to ask them. At one time, back in my day, a parent could show up and talk to the teacher... the teacher had maybe a couple of minutes notice that the parent was there. Now, such talks are scheduled days in advance, so a problem teacher has plenty of time to cover their actions and rehearse excuses.

With kids doing hybrid teachers seem to try to assign things the kids can do in the house and including the parent in a lesson can be a good experience for the kid.

The problem with that is that these "parents involved" exercises typically turn into an attempt to teach the parents. One experience I had that caused some ruckus...

Someone with a lack of mental acuity decided that it would be a good idea to come up with a "contract" for the kids at the start of the school year. I read the thing. It started off with a very unspecific list of what the teacher would do under this "contract," then gave a list of specific things the child was to do under this "contract," and ended with a specific (and intrusive) list of what the parents were supposed to do under this "contract." I refused to sign the thing, and forbad my kids to sign it. Instead I wrote "REFUSED" across the page and sent it back.

I was then told I had to sign it, and so did my kids.

Here's the thing: this was not even a legal contract. In the first place, a contract cannot be signed by a minor child. In the second place, the teacher did not sign the contract, even though it specified nothing that could be binding on them. In the third place, no one can force me, as a citizen of the United States and an adult, to sign an agreement I choose not to sign. In the fourth place, since this "contract" is unenforceable, it will teach my children that contracts are not binding and can be broken without consequence. And in the fifth place, it would tell the administration of the school that I was willing to go along with whatever crazy concept they concocted.

That went on for three years, until finally I visited the school personally over the issue and spoke to the principal. When I left, no such cockamamie "contract" was ever sent home again. Come to find out, i was not the only parent with the same concerns, and almost every school in the district had had multiple similar visits.

Minor? Yeah, I guess so. But this was an attempt to control the parents, and I was not going to let that stand. The assignments that forcefully include the parents are the same thing. If a child needs parental involvement over their grades, it is the teacher's place to talk to the parents. It is not the teacher's place to "include" them in the lesson. That's just a way to stick their nose where it doesn't belong.

I knew when to include myself in my child's education. I didn't need the guidance of their teacher via "lessons."

TheRedneck