Cities in Europe and Britain may be under attack

a reply to: turretless

Sorry but who is invading Ukraine?

Coz it sure isn't NATO.

Your turn to answer questions methinks.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes or any other sort?

And do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding such?

a reply to: ScepticScot

Oops. Seems you are....correct

11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with a new constitution entering into force by the end of 2015 providing for decentralization as a key element (including a reference to the specificities of certain areas in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with the representatives of these areas), as well as adopting permanent legislation on the special status of certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in line with measures as set out in the footnote until the end of 2015.

Did that part end up happening? Decentralization?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Sorry but who is invading Ukraine?

Coz it sure isn't NATO.

Your turn to answer questions methinks.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes or any other sort?

And do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding such?

In 2014, the West invaded Ukraine.

Now we have to correct the consequences of this invasion and destroy the anti-Russian Nazis.

I'm too obtuse (and ill mannered) to answer your questions.

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: ScepticScot

Oops. Seems you are....correct

11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with a new constitution entering into force by the end of 2015 providing for decentralization as a key element (including a reference to the specificities of certain areas in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, agreed with the representatives of these areas), as well as adopting permanent legislation on the special status of certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in line with measures as set out in the footnote until the end of 2015.

Did that part end up happening? Decentralization?

Did they even get beyond?

1.Immediate and full ceasefire in particular districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine and its strict fulfilment as of 00:00 midnight EET on 15 February 2015.

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Sorry but who is invading Ukraine?

Coz it sure isn't NATO.

Your turn to answer questions methinks.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes or any other sort?

And do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding such?

In 2014, the West invaded Ukraine.

Now we have to correct the consequences of this invasion and destroy the anti-Russian Nazis.

I'm too obtuse (and ill mannered) to answer your questions.

Is this one of those alternative histories?

a reply to: RussianTroll

Hence the conclusion: stop fighting with Russia, otherwise the boomerang will return very quickly. Such thoughts...

Hitler tried that , didn't do him much good though.

a reply to: turretless

Cry that river all you wish turretless nobody worth there salt entertains such nonsense.

As to consequences well the better part of the civilised nations of the world are against Russia, and her invasion of her peaceful neighbour, so not just NATO nations.

Good luck fighting those odds or attempting to convince them as to Russia's intensions.

Because they can see your nation for what she is, same as they can see all the atrocities being committed.

And its not just my questions that you fail to answer but other peoples in the thread also.

If you cannot reciprocate where simple queries are concerned, don't bother asking anymore silly questions.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Sorry but who is invading Ukraine?

Coz it sure isn't NATO.

Your turn to answer questions methinks.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes or any other sort?

And do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding such?

In 2014, the West invaded Ukraine.

Now we have to correct the consequences of this invasion and destroy the anti-Russian Nazis.

I'm too obtuse (and ill mannered) to answer your questions.

Is this one of those alternative histories?

Unfortunately, this is our branch of history.

Only after the coup did Europe manage to impose an unfavorable treaty on Ukraine - THIS IS a .PDF file - trade.ec.europa.eu...

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Cry that river all you wish turretless nobody worth there salt entertains such nonsense.

As to consequences well the better part of the civilised nations of the world are against Russia, and her invasion of her peaceful neighbour, so not just NATO nations.

Good luck fighting those odds or attempting to convince them as to Russia's intensions.

Because they can see your nation for what she is, same as they can see all the atrocities being committed.

And its not just my questions that you fail to answer but other peoples in the thread also.

If you cannot reciprocate where simple queries are concerned, don't bother asking anymore silly questions.

The obtuse person asks silly questions.

It's unavoidable.

Be forgiving.

a reply to: turretless

Take a spoonful of your own medicine then and try answering some questions.

As opposed to asking daft or loaded conundrums.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes, or any other sort, in Ukraine, or being used on any other nation?

Do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding the concept of escalate to deescalate?

a reply to: turretless

your Leader is shiite. you know it,the world knows it.

Ukraine liberated itself from a corrupt politician who was stealing money and going against the wishes of its people. Sounds like a revolution to me.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Take a spoonful of your own medicine then and try answering some questions.

As opposed to asking daft or loaded conundrums.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes, or any other sort, in Ukraine, or being used on any other nation?

Do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding the concept of escalate to deescalate?

Why are you picking on a obtuse person?

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: turretless

your Leader is shiite. you know it,the world knows it.

Ukraine liberated itself from a corrupt politician who was stealing money and going against the wishes of its people. Sounds like a revolution to me.

Are Poroshenko and Zelensky absolutely honest people?

Can you argue that we will not find a single dollar (hryvnia) from the Ukrainian budget in their pockets?

a reply to: turretless

Do you feel like you are being picked on?

Why cant, or why do you refuse, to answer simple questions?

The measure of your mettle is rather apparent this evening turretless.

Seem a bit flustered fellow, with your feathers all ruffled.

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Sorry but who is invading Ukraine?

Coz it sure isn't NATO.

Your turn to answer questions methinks.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes or any other sort?

And do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding such?

In 2014, the West invaded Ukraine.

Now we have to correct the consequences of this invasion and destroy the anti-Russian Nazis.

I'm too obtuse (and ill mannered) to answer your questions.

And russia has been invading Ukraine since the 1600s

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Sorry but who is invading Ukraine?

Coz it sure isn't NATO.

Your turn to answer questions methinks.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes or any other sort?

And do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding such?

In 2014, the West invaded Ukraine.

Now we have to correct the consequences of this invasion and destroy the anti-Russian Nazis.

I'm too obtuse (and ill mannered) to answer your questions.

And russia has been invading Ukraine since the 1600s

The hetman of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, Bohdan Khmelnytsky, had been leading a revolt against Polish rule in Ukraine since 1648. In 1651, in the face of a growing threat from Poland and forsaken by his Tatar allies, Khmelnytsky asked the tsar to incorporate Ukraine as an autonomous duchy under Russian protection. The Russians were reluctant to enter into such an agreement, and it was not until October 1653 that a Russian zemsky sobor (“assembly of the land”) approved the request and Alexis sent a delegation, headed by V.V. Buturlin, to the Cossacks.

www.britannica.com...

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: turretless

Sorry but who is invading Ukraine?

Coz it sure isn't NATO.

Your turn to answer questions methinks.

Do you support the use of battlefield nukes or any other sort?

And do you back or agree with current Russian military doctrine regarding such?

In 2014, the West invaded Ukraine.

Now we have to correct the consequences of this invasion and destroy the anti-Russian Nazis.

I'm too obtuse (and ill mannered) to answer your questions.

Is this one of those alternative histories?

Unfortunately, this is our branch of history.

Only after the coup did Europe manage to impose an unfavorable treaty on Ukraine - THIS IS a .PDF file - trade.ec.europa.eu...

Which shows the West invading Ukraine how?

Russian Forces can't even correctly attack a backwoods Euro redneck nation like Ukraine, which is on their own border, without taking excessive casualties and losing military hardware.

To even assume that Russia would attempt an attack on another Nation, in the face of such failures, is delusional and borderline full retarded.

Russian Forces would have to be facing some extraordinary threats, to even begin simultaneous invasions upon multiple Nations.

Personally, I have a very hard time believing Russia is that stupid. Crazy as Putin may be, he isn't going to risk additional losses to save what little face he has left. If anything, he will double down on Ukraine's Eastern Donbas region and Crimea.

To attempt otherwise would be stretching his already weak logistics even further, and would guarantee defeat.

Anybody who says otherwise, doesn't understand that logistics is key to victory. Followed by Intel.

My words are only conjecture, and time will show us what's really in the works. TBH no one knows, what's going to happen. But history is a solid measuring stick as to what is possible.

originally posted by: RussianTroll

originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: RussianTroll

Well in that case I'd say they didn't invent it. Russia has a lot of good engineers afaik, so I'm not saying you couldn't design a boomerang.

Russians can invent and produce anything without the genocide of the indigenous population of America, Australia, Canada, India, China and many other countries.)))

No, you just murder your own countrymen when situation warrants it. Stalin and the Bolsheviks come to mind. And I am guessing most recently anyone who disagrees with your glorious Czar.

originally posted by: RussianTroll

originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: RussianTroll

Well in that case I'd say they didn't invent it. Russia has a lot of good engineers afaik, so I'm not saying you couldn't design a boomerang.

Russians can invent and produce anything without the genocide of the indigenous population of America, Australia, Canada, India, China and many other countries.)))

Excuse me, but may I add one additional thing? IF you in fact launch missiles and this ignites a global nuclear war, you will be genociding EVERY indigenous inhabitant of planet Earth. Did you ever stop to think of the irony of that?