Lavrov "We are at war with NATO"

Why isn't this statement on all MSM, it is what he said, Russian long-time foreign Minister Lavrov has stated that we are on the eve of a Nuclear war. According to Alex Jones, it is escalating all the way to Armageddon. I don't see any real diplomatic will to alter the way this is going, it seems to be an orchestrated escalation, going through the usual escalation to full-scale conflict. Are they Gambling on the fact that Putin will back down and withdraw troops from Ukraine? this isn't going to happen. The explosions in Russia have taken the war to the Russian homeland. Or will we see some last-minute progress as saner minds replace the current initiative. www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

So either Biden has a sit down and sorts this all out with Putin...

Or

....nukes start flying.


Interesting times.

a reply to: anonentity

The thing is that NATO is a defensive pact, not offensive. If any country feels that they would like to join, they may petition the group to join. But it's not like NATO is marketing protection schemes like the mafia. They accept like minded countries. This is where Russia's calculations is off. NATO is not actively encroaching on their doorstep. Their neighbors are not feeling safe and are asking for protection.

If Lavrov is expressing end of the world scenarios, it's because Ukraine is not going down like they sold it internally.

a reply to: JinMI Indeed. To me honestly, it's getting spooky now. Peace.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: anonentity

So either Biden has a sit down and sorts this all out with Putin...

Or

....nukes start flying.


Interesting times.

You really think Biden is running NATO?
Macron doesn’t even answer his calls.

Try again.

NATO, not US.

a reply to: PassiveSeeker

Now you get the joke.

a reply to: anonentity

Yesterday I was watching my 5 minutes news and this one reporter who's their Russia correspondent, really well connected and lives there quite some time now, said with name and everything (I don't remember) he spoke to a former Duma member who told him they're preparing a nuclear strike.

So yes that's going to happen imho
NATO, EU, US can't and won't suddenly stop supporting Ukraine, because they fear if they do Russia will expand her occupation to more and more countries.
Russia can't back down because with the sanctions now more than ever if she wants to grow she can only do that by increasing size of her domestic market, I think.

The question to me is basically just where, when, what's the scale and what'll be the reaction?

a reply to: inert

The thing is that NATO is a defensive pact, not offensive.

Libya???

But it's not like NATO is marketing protection schemes like the mafia.

Can't tell if that is sarcasm but it definitely reads like sarcasm.

a reply to: Peeple

How the hell do you increase your domestic market with a nuclear strike? Low yield or not?

I thought nukes killed people and made them uninhabitable awhile…not opened Walmarts


…sure you get the jist of what I’m saying.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: anonentity

So either Biden has a sit down and sorts this all out with Putin...

Or

....nukes start flying.


Interesting times.

Biden can't even sort out a speech on the teleprompter. How in the hell is Putin going to sort things out with him?

If someone says something biden doesn't like, he calls them fat and challenges them to do pushups. Well, we lost the war if he does that with Putin.

a reply to: rickymouse

How indeed.....

a reply to: PassiveSeeker

No, by invading Ukraine, Transnistrien whatever they set their eyes on, that's increasing the domestic market.
The nukes are for NL, GB, or whatever Russia's tactical counsels deem most wise.

I thought it was pretty obvious from it being its own paragraph that I was referring to the invasion? No?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: anonentity

So either Biden has a sit down and sorts this all out with Putin...

Or

....nukes start flying.


Interesting times.

Well one NeoCon Senator on twitter did admit either last year in March or this year that Trump winning the presidency did prevent their proxy war agaisnt Russia in Ukraine in 2016.

Which was interesting to see.

a reply to: Peeple

No the regime change in Ukraine started the mess in Ukraine remember when John McCain and Co showed up in Kiev, taking photos of the protests?

Thinking there would be no consequences letting it happen as they please?

Ron Paul was right about these regime changes having blowbacks.
We are witnessing those consequences.

a reply to: Peeple

NATO, EU, US can't and won't suddenly stop supporting Ukraine, because they fear if they do Russia will expand her occupation to more and more countries

Eventually NATO, EU has to stop they already lost in central Asia in Afghanistan. Russia has no interests in other countries they arent there to expand an empire as an vid on YT claims.

a reply to: anonentity

First and foremost , this is not on Biden! Anyone claiming that, is a fool! NATO is made up of over 100 countries! Most of the entire WORLD is against Putin! So many of you are quick to blame Biden! Almost the entire WORLD says Putin is to blame! The Ukraine certainly didn't attack Russia! Russia did attack the Ukraine! Wake the hell up!

a reply to: vNex92

Please. How does that make any difference? Russia wanted Ukraine as part of her sphere of hegemony. As satellite state failed. Now the invasion.
But the point either way is to increase her size.

a reply to: vNex92

What vid on Youtube? And of course she does, what else would be the point?

a reply to: Peeple

Its more resources than size.

But yes, neither side can afford to back off now.

Both are firmly entrenched without a way out.

Some of us think its by design.