950 Thousand Lives Could Have Been Saved If Doctors Were Allowed To Be Doctors

Doctors are meant to be scientists who are able to use their working knowledgebase and process of deduction to figure medical problems out, often on the fly. This is the type of intuition engineers use as well when they are solving problems. They aren't meant to be basic technicians that simply follow administrative orders. That's why they spend so much time training and becoming educated. But in March 2020, doctors were asked to stop thinking, and start following orders that often made no sense.

Early on in the pandemic, doctors like Peter McCullough and Pierre Cory found dramatic success using repurposed antivirals like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to treat Covid-19 patients. They reported their results and tried to share their information, but they were completely demonized along with the drugs they claimed to have had success with. We saw from the leaked Fauci emails and the fake surgisphere studies how this was done to silence any debate about repurposed drugs.

Previous to this, these doctors had stellar reputations. McCullough for example was one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States. There is no reason for these doctors to have lied about their findings, and real time observations are part of the medical formula.

A curious thing happened however--no matter what drug a doctor found success with, it was swept under the rug. There were a few exceptions, but they were reserved for critical patients, such as remdesivir, but it had terrible results and is now seen as a death sentence. We now know that if any drug would have been used as an effective treatment for Covid-19, it would have blocked the vaccine EUA, and the 10's of billions of dollars big pharma would have collected in the last 2 years.

Dr. Brian Tyson, and George Fareed discovered the same thing as McCullough, and other front line doctors. They both treated 7000 Covid-19 patients with drug combinations including drugs like ivermectin, doxycycline, and supplements like zinc and vitamin D. All 7000 patients survived and they published a book about their success.

The real low hanging fruit was Vitamin D. Early on in 2020 there were already studies showing the correlation between low vitamin D levels and covid mortality. This would have been one of the easiest things for the CDC to recommend, but they were silent on the issue. It doesn't seem they were as interested in public health as they were about politics and big pharma profits.

In November of 2020, my estimate at that time [was] we could have saved 50% of the lives... By March of 2021... I said, '85% of lives could have been saved.' And then recently, in January, just a few months ago, I upgraded and said, "95% of all the deaths could have been avoided and easily that of the hospitalizations. We're coming up on a million Americans losing their lives and probably 10 million hospitalizations. 95% of it would be avoidable if leaders in Washington would have promoted constructive dialogue, brought in the experts, have the experts volunteer their time... and help America and the world get through COVID-19.

Dr. McCullough's presentation starts at 32 minutes.

Doctors have to follow protocols set by hospital administrators or face loosing their hospital privileges. Also, medicine has become so complex they rely on scientific research to help set the policy of what treatments work, and what are too risky.

If the hospital protocol says you WILL NOT use a certain antibiotic to treat pneumonia, it's assumed the research has been done and for whatever reason, it's been proven to be either harmful or ineffective.

Early on, doctors and hospitals were given the protocol they were to follow for treating covid, and were barred from using certain treatments until they were fully researched for use in covid patients, the thought being they could make it worse. Look how long science drug the 'research' out, and then claimed it showed zero benefit.

I don't blame the doctors for following the rules of their profession in order to stay employed anymore than I blame people for rushing to get the vaccine, believing it would prevent infection. The researchers and doctors that spoke out are paying a very heavy price.

And they call as crazy conspiracy theorists for entertaining nefarious agendas. I hope these doctors who stood their ground get the recognition they so deserve..... although highly unlikely in this clown world.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even before COVID the Vitamin D issue was a big one. Big pharma doesn't want Vitamin D deficiencies cured because it keeps them in robust business pushing anti-depressants, pain medicine, diet pills, boner pills, and various cold and flu "remedies." Simple fact, the western diet is far too low in organ meats and fish for the average American to naturally have high enough levels of serum Vitamin D. When those levels are critically low, your well being is also critically low... but big pharma needs everyone to believe they have a lab generated pill to fix you (but of course those pills only work on the symptoms, not the cause, because there's no money in curing someone... only in regularly treating their symptoms)

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

So, let me get this straight…Peter McCullough personally treated 7000 patents with ivermectin , hydroxychloroquine and other medications/supplements from the the time Covid started in late 2019/ early 2020 until now? The is quite a miraculously feat…. That’s about 10 patients a day, every day for two years…..

Ok, let’s take only week days, that’s about 13 patients a day for two years. But wait, Petey found himself in hot water in late 2020, and before congress in early 2021. That must have taking a lot of time out of his blood letting treatments. So he must have been just forcing these medications on his patients at a tremendous rate.

I am feeling there may be a tad bit of exaggeration…so I have trouble believing anything you or he says.

Also, latest studies found no benefit of the prophylactic use of these medications..here is an interesting article I have saved from WebMD.

www.webmd.com...

Lives could have been saved if the government and people as whole did a better job getting this virus under control at the beginning.

a reply to: Member3877

c19ivermectin.com

157 ivermectin COVID-19 studies, 108 peer reviewed, 82 comparing treatment and control groups. Recent: Albariqi Delandre Reis. Ivermectin has been officially adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations).

Here in Australia, a few months ago the TGA looked at 7 studies around Ivermectin and said there was not enough evidence. Doctors have lost their job for trying a medication that has been well known about for around 50 years with an excellent safety profile.

The TGA was happy to take one study hidden from public review with a 75 year suppression order by Pfizer and mandate it on the public with a new experimental technology with disastrous results.

The cost - benefit approach by our governments health establishment does not add up for public health. So who is benefiting and at what cost?

a reply to: kwakakev

Lol, that tracker is bunk.

For example, one of the so called studies it references is a sub stack opinion piece from Alexandros Marinos….not a doctor, not valid references.

doyourownresearch.substack.com...

Bunk.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

tested positive, bought zinc, vit D, and took Lypo–Spheric Vitamin C.. took 3 days to feel the head cold... Can't deal back to work.. 5 days later with a rapid test

a reply to: Member3877

Much rather trust McCullough with all his background and knowledge and work in the field over YOUR opinion......anonymous internet man

And here's the reason for the push still from the Frontline doctors. This is from last month. You didn't really think this group had the cure or even really cares about you, do you? It's all about the grift.

ABC News obtained an email sent by Encore Telemedicine, an entity that was connecting patients to telemedicine services for people seeking consultation through the physicians group America's Frontline Doctors. In the email, Encore Telemedicine sought to entice physicians to "become part of an ivermectin 'COVID-19 project'" with the potential to receive "tens of thousands of dollars per month" from prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

"We can send you as many patients per day at $30 per patient per encounter as you would like," the email stated. "We have physicians making tens of thousands of dollars per month."

ABC

No surprise, Dr. Kory and the rest of the Frontline docs had no comment. Heck I'm still waiting for the Frontline demon sperm doc lady to present her documentation for the 100s or thousands she said she cured. It's been almost 2 years, still waiting.

a reply to: Member3877

Lol, that tracker is bunk.

Ahh, back to the good old days of the 9/11 debates. Been a while since the bunk terminology has been thrown around.

If you are happy with your jabs and looking forward to your boosters, it's life to do what you want, go for it. I will pass as a growing body of evidence is only gaining strength. Time will tell.

originally posted by: frogs453
And here's the reason for the push still from the Frontline doctors. This is from last month. You didn't really think this group had the cure or even really cares about you, do you? It's all about the grift.

ABC News obtained an email sent by Encore Telemedicine, an entity that was connecting patients to telemedicine services for people seeking consultation through the physicians group America's Frontline Doctors. In the email, Encore Telemedicine sought to entice physicians to "become part of an ivermectin 'COVID-19 project'" with the potential to receive "tens of thousands of dollars per month" from prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

"We can send you as many patients per day at $30 per patient per encounter as you would like," the email stated. "We have physicians making tens of thousands of dollars per month."

ABC

No surprise, Dr. Kory and the rest of the Frontline docs had no comment. Heck I'm still waiting for the Frontline demon sperm doc lady to present her documentation for the 100s or thousands she said she cured. It's been almost 2 years, still waiting.

Yeah, I'm real sure some mainstream media hit piece is legit. HHS paid the media billions of dollars to promote the vaccine, and discredit everyone else.

Nice try, but no one trusts the lamestream media anymore but you. Infact the lamestream media is dying, it's going away, and alt media is taking over.

82 studies, showing overwhelming efficacy. ivmmeta.com...

Oh, and theres the matter of the top secret DARPA documents that got leaked where they admitted ivermectin was a cure for covid-19 in april 2020. Nice try.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Well, from the non mainstream sites like The Amercican Conservative, regarding the Darpa claim they are full of, "alleged claims" "if it is authentic" "appear to confirm". Not one single confirmation of any of the information.

American Conservative

And some concerning information involving many of the trials that were published about Ivermectin.

Ivermectin and the Integrity of Healthcare Evidence During COVID-19

a reply to: kwakakev

The word 'Bunk' is a strange one. It reminds me of a 'bunker', a place you hid out in while the bombs are landing. In this information war, it is a place to hide out from the facts and truth. Nancy Pelosi explains how it works with her 'Wrap up smear'.

The Great Reset, the Great Awakening? It's a complicated world with lots going on.

HCQ is another good one, well known about and commonly used regularly. Over 300 studies on that and growing. Click, click, Boom.

Not happy with Paul Kelly, Federal Chief Medical Officer. Big part in locking up treatments and pushing out the jabs. There are others. Looks to be about more than just covid with what ever it is? With an election coming up:

Clive Palmer and the United Australia Party has been better on the covid issues. He did bring in a big shipment of HCQ at the start of the pandemic till the feds locked it up on him. Some talk in Parliament over these issues.

Pauline Hanson and One Nation is also supportive, Malcolm Roberts has been doing some good work lately,

The Australian Federation party has some good people to help address some of these broader community issues.

IMOP or Informed Medical Options Party is another one strong on this front.

With Liberal and Labor not much different these days, liberal doing a bit better on these issues.

With the way the last USA election went, expecting Labor to win the steal. Hoping a few more minor parties and independents get up.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even before COVID the Vitamin D issue was a big one. Big pharma doesn't want Vitamin D deficiencies cured because it keeps them in robust business pushing anti-depressants, pain medicine, diet pills, boner pills, and various cold and flu "remedies." Simple fact, the western diet is far too low in organ meats and fish for the average American to naturally have high enough levels of serum Vitamin D. When those levels are critically low, your well being is also critically low... but big pharma needs everyone to believe they have a lab generated pill to fix you (but of course those pills only work on the symptoms, not the cause, because there's no money in curing someone... only in regularly treating their symptoms)

right on.

if they could prove it,
Munchausen by proxy is a crime.

keep people just sick enough so they keep coming back.


fauci shows classic symptoms.

a reply to: Member3877

I'm having trouble believing what ANY person says when it is simply a repeat of Teflon Tony's psychobabble....

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Member3877

I'm having trouble believing what ANY person says when it is simply a repeat of Teflon Tony's psychobabble....

I think anyone who repeats his psychobabble automatically discredits themselves period.

a reply to: Member3877

My wife's clinic sees up to 80 patients a day with only like 4 practitioners. thats 20 a day per. whats so special about this Dr seeing 13 a day?

By 'getting the virus under control' I think you mean 'getting the people under more Control' ie making them prisoners.