Pfizer Had Need To Hire 2400 New Employees To Record Adverse Effects

As the massive number of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trials documents slowly trickle out, more revelations are coming to light. One of the most alarming admissions from the recent April document data dump is that Pfizer hired 600 employees and had a need for a total of 2400 employees to track adverse effects. I knew there were a lot of adverse effects and deaths occurring, but this is beyond anything I could have imagined.

Pfizer needed the all the additional employees to track:

"the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product"

Through Feb 2021, with less than 10% of the US population "fully vaccinated", there were already 1,223 adverse event reports with a 'Fatal' outcome. As we know, these reported events are drastically undercounted. If you look at the second image, there are 9400 cases with an "unknown" outcome. I wonder what happened to them?

It all seems strange to me with a product that is 100% safe and effective.

SOURCE

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

This is just becoming absurd at this point. You'd have to be a brain-dead Zombie to continue defending and deflecting for Pfizer and the rest of these criminals.



Oh wait

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

This is just becoming absurd at this point. You'd have to be a brain-dead Zombie to continue defending and deflecting for Pfizer and the rest of these criminals.



Oh wait

They will arrive shortly.....

The virus and vaccine are so yesterday for most people now, but I think it's a very important topic to keep digging into; the next 'pandemic' may be closer than we realize.

LOL, ARRGG!
I can't believe you said that.

a reply to: underpass61

At this point it is very apparent that they are neither safe nor effective, glad I didn't join the vax queue.

originally posted by: abigredneck
LOL, ARRGG!
I can't believe you said that.

a reply to: underpass61

The irony of the name can't be overlooked. Look no farther than the 1p36 deletion listed as a side effect of the Pfizer vaccine. People with this gene deletion literally act like zombies.

The needed to hire all those people....To Record Adverse Effects or to hide adverse effects? It takes more people to believably hide the truth.

a reply to: rickymouse

I think we know the answer to that question.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Or.... maybe the numbers are misrepresented?

Here is the actual data from the stock market about number of employees for Pfizer

About 500 jobs were added, yes... but notice that at the beginning of Covid, they downsized by 10,000 or so, and in fact the numbers have been declining since 2009. This is the lowest number of employees they've had since 2014.

Furthermore, they're a global company.

On the data side, hiring 600 people to "enter vaccine harm data" is just... silly.

Their harm reporting system already dumps the data into a big database. It's not phoned in or mailed in or handed to them on paper.

It doesn't take 600 people to crunch data that someone else has been entering (I had a sudden and amusing vision of them hiring 600 people to run on treadmills to power the electricity to power the computers). New York City can handle 6,000+ emergency calls per day with a staff of 1500 (according to two sources)

Dive into the source. Crunch the numbers. Look at how many vaccines were administered and of those how many had reported vaccine injuries (to do this, divide vaccine injuries number by total number of doses. The answer is "0.00033345329", which is 0.03% (three hundredths of one percent.)

The total number of reports is on page 9. The total number of vaccines given is on page 6 (general overview.)


Just for fun, you can crunch more numbers....
Page 6 gives the total number of fatalities (divide that by the total doses)

And check the breakdown on the data (starts on page 9)... turns out "nervous system disorders" is primarily "headache" followed by "dizziness"


And it took me just a handful of minutes to find those numbers. With a good database search, it'd take about an hour or so to retrieve all the stats... more time to write it up, of course and put in all the frills and details.



tl;dr - someone's leaping to the wrong conclusions if they're claiming that 1800 people had to be added to deal with all the adverse event reports coming in over a 2 year period. The number of cases reported is roughly the same as the number of emergency calls that New York City's 911 dispatchers can handle (and enter into a database) in a one month period.

originally posted by: Byrd
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Or.... maybe the numbers are misrepresented?

Here is the actual data from the stock market about number of employees for Pfizer

About 500 jobs were added, yes... but notice that at the beginning of Covid, they downsized by 10,000 or so, and in fact the numbers have been declining since 2009. This is the lowest number of employees they've had since 2014.

Furthermore, they're a global company.

On the data side, hiring 600 people to "enter vaccine harm data" is just... silly.

Their harm reporting system already dumps the data into a big database. It's not phoned in or mailed in or handed to them on paper.

It doesn't take 600 people to crunch data that someone else has been entering (I had a sudden and amusing vision of them hiring 600 people to run on treadmills to power the electricity to power the computers). New York City can handle 6,000+ emergency calls per day with a staff of 1500 (according to two sources)

Dive into the source. Crunch the numbers. Look at how many vaccines were administered and of those how many had reported vaccine injuries (to do this, divide vaccine injuries number by total number of doses. The answer is "0.00033345329", which is 0.03% (three hundredths of one percent.)

The total number of reports is on page 9. The total number of vaccines given is on page 6 (general overview.)


Just for fun, you can crunch more numbers....
Page 6 gives the total number of fatalities (divide that by the total doses)

And check the breakdown on the data (starts on page 9)... turns out "nervous system disorders" is primarily "headache" followed by "dizziness"


And it took me just a handful of minutes to find those numbers. With a good database search, it'd take about an hour or so to retrieve all the stats... more time to write it up, of course and put in all the frills and details.



tl;dr - someone's leaping to the wrong conclusions if they're claiming that 1800 people had to be added to deal with all the adverse event reports coming in over a 2 year period. The number of cases reported is roughly the same as the number of emergency calls that New York City's 911 dispatchers can handle (and enter into a database) in a one month period.

The fact is they are admitting there is a "large number of spontaneous adverse effects." It's funny how you ignore the side effects like 1,223 deaths, and then try to explain away the nervous system disorders by saying they are mild by using the most common ones. Good lawyer logic if you were defending them in court. Go ahead and defend them, we know they have an amazing track record of truthfulness.

The CEO of pfizer has to backtrack on his previous statements of calling anyone criticizing the company's vaccines as criminals for daring to question its safety.

a reply to: Byrd

Also on page 6, as highlighted by OP:

Pfizer has also taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports. This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional fulltime employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than
1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.

Sounds like the two (the hiring of 600 additional fulltime employees and the large increase of adverse event reports) are linked.

The general overview number given for the doses were for doses shipped, not administered. In that case the percentage of adverse effects and deaths would be higher than your calculation. Too high, certainly, for mandating the "treatment" on others.

It is estimated that approximately 126,212,580 doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide

Interesting tidbit on page 9 (bold mine)

Missing Information: Use in Pregnancy and lactation
Use in Paediatric Individuals over 12 Years of Age
Vaccine Effectiveness

Last 9 pages of the 38 pg report dedicated solely to "adverse events of special interest", listed one after another. Here's about quarter of one of those pages

1p36 deletion syndrome;2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria;5'nucleotidase increased;Acoustic neuritis;Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency;Acquired epidermolysis bullosa;Acquired epileptic aphasia;Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;Acute
encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures;Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis;Acute flaccid myelitis;Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis;Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy;Acute kidney injury;Acute macular outer retinopathy;Acute motor axonal neuropathy;Acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy;Acute myocardial infarction;Acute respiratory distress syndrome;Acute respiratory failure;Addison's
disease;Administration site thrombosis;Administration site vasculitis;Adrenal thrombosis;Adverse event following immunisation;Ageusia;Agranulocytosis;Air embolism;Alanine aminotransferase abnormal;Alanine aminotransferase increased;Alcoholic
seizure;Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis;Allergic oedema;Alloimmune hepatitis;Alopecia areata;Alpers disease;Alveolar proteinosis;Ammonia abnormal ..........

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

This is just becoming absurd at this point. You'd have to be a brain-dead Zombie to continue defending and deflecting for Pfizer and the rest of these criminals.



Oh wait

Like TRUMP..?

The great Dunning Kruger masses leader.

Warp speed...and he hired the best people?!

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Typical, people get a corn cob up their backside when Pfizer say that it's going to take them 50 plus years to clear the backlog, and everyone tells them to hire more people.

Now it's been proved that they are hiring more people, and everyone tries to make out that this is a conspiracy.

This is the biggest vax campaign in history, these numbers are to be expected because of the sheer number of people involved.

It's not a conspiracy, it's just math.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You're referring to a different agency.
smh

But the FDA can’t simply turn the documents over wholesale. The records must be reviewed to redact “confidential business and trade secret information of Pfizer or BioNTech and personal privacy information of patients who participated in clinical trials,” wrote DOJ lawyers in a joint status report filed Monday.

The FDA proposes releasing 500 pages per month on a rolling basis, noting that the branch that would handle the review has only 10 employees and is currently processing about 400 other FOIA requests.

www.reuters.com...

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You're referring to a different agency.
smh

But the FDA can’t simply turn the documents over wholesale. The records must be reviewed to redact “confidential business and trade secret information of Pfizer or BioNTech and personal privacy information of patients who participated in clinical trials,” wrote DOJ lawyers in a joint status report filed Monday.

The FDA proposes releasing 500 pages per month on a rolling basis, noting that the branch that would handle the review has only 10 employees and is currently processing about 400 other FOIA requests.

www.reuters.com...

Same company, you don't think that other departments aren't having similar problems?

The fact that they hired people to do this the right was demonstrates that they're not trying to sweep this under the rug.

This is the biggest and they fastest vax rollout in history, so all of the numbers involved will be big.

For example, at no time in history have so many people farted in a Vax center in any given week.

originally posted by: vNex92
The CEO of pfizer has to backtrack on his previous statements of calling anyone criticizing the company's vaccines as criminals for daring to question its safety.

Yes, but he won't.

He will continue to spout the sophistry and propaganda.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Wait... so the FDA and Pfizer are the same company? That would certainly make sense considering!
www.science.org...

originally posted by: Byrd
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Or.... maybe the numbers are misrepresented?

Here is the actual data from the stock market about number of employees for Pfizer

About 500 jobs were added, yes... but notice that at the beginning of Covid, they downsized by 10,000 or so, and in fact the numbers have been declining since 2009. This is the lowest number of employees they've had since 2014.

Furthermore, they're a global company.

On the data side, hiring 600 people to "enter vaccine harm data" is just... silly.

Their harm reporting system already dumps the data into a big database. It's not phoned in or mailed in or handed to them on paper.

It doesn't take 600 people to crunch data that someone else has been entering (I had a sudden and amusing vision of them hiring 600 people to run on treadmills to power the electricity to power the computers). New York City can handle 6,000+ emergency calls per day with a staff of 1500 (according to two sources)

Dive into the source. Crunch the numbers. Look at how many vaccines were administered and of those how many had reported vaccine injuries (to do this, divide vaccine injuries number by total number of doses. The answer is "0.00033345329", which is 0.03% (three hundredths of one percent.)

The total number of reports is on page 9. The total number of vaccines given is on page 6 (general overview.)


Just for fun, you can crunch more numbers....
Page 6 gives the total number of fatalities (divide that by the total doses)

And check the breakdown on the data (starts on page 9)... turns out "nervous system disorders" is primarily "headache" followed by "dizziness"


And it took me just a handful of minutes to find those numbers. With a good database search, it'd take about an hour or so to retrieve all the stats... more time to write it up, of course and put in all the frills and details.



tl;dr - someone's leaping to the wrong conclusions if they're claiming that 1800 people had to be added to deal with all the adverse event reports coming in over a 2 year period. The number of cases reported is roughly the same as the number of emergency calls that New York City's 911 dispatchers can handle (and enter into a database) in a one month period.

Pretty crazy someone will type all this up on the internet to defend a billion dollar company known for lying. Wonder why they spend so much money on lawyers and employees to do it? We have plenty here who will happily do it for FREE!

originally posted by: Byrd
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Or.... maybe the numbers are misrepresented?

Here is the actual data from the stock market about number of employees for Pfizer

If Pfizer misrepresented their own data in the report (on something as innocuous as new hires), can we trust the adverse and fatal reactions to the drug are reported correctly?