It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 472124 No.275544 📁
Feb 5 2018 12:16:50 (EST)
Why did the #Memo drop a Friday [& before the SB]?
Did this seem strange to you?
Watch the news.
Rothschild estate sale [Black Forest].
Stock market DIVE [666 - coincidence?].
Soros transfer of wealth.
Dopey FREED.
Marriage for POWER, not LOVE.
Hilton/Roth.
Soros/Clinton.
Etc.
News unlocks MAP.
Think Mirror.
Which team?
THEY don't know.
APACHE.
These people are EVIL.
Still don't believe you are SHEEP to them?
20/20 coming.
PUBLIC is VITAL.
RELEASE of INFO VITAL.
OUTRAGE.
JUSTICE.
Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?
FOLLOW THE LIGHT.
Q
Sri Lanka has a history of diverting aid. @IMFnews must acknowledge the reason the country is in this mess by putting this issue on the agenda during their visit. Otherwise they risk bailing out corrupt politicians instead of people in need. t.co...
Great to meet up with @georgesoros and @AlexanderSoros. Talked about the #WesternBalkans, #EU enlargement process and #Russia’s war of aggression against #Ukraine @OpenSociety t.co...
How, and more importantly why, are those notes real?
rumble.com...
Rumble (rumble.com...)
Joe Biden Holds Up Notes of Bizarre Detailed Instructions for Him to Follow
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f946c4 No.20857 📁
Jan 7 2018 22:27:43 (EST)
P_pers: [1] Confirmed.
_ACTION_DBF5Cz-BSY-1_y
FOR GOD & COUNTRY.
SKY FORTRESS ENGAGED>
Q
Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 352a77 No.1415794 📁
May 15 2018 00:04:10 (EST)
#1776
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
soundcloud.com...📁
]SESSIONS[
We Fight!
Q
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Re: Biden's CUE CARD - more FUTURE proves PAST - SKY FORTRESS ENGAGED:
From RTM VIDEO on telegram at 05:01:23 comes this RUMBLE link to the C-span video where he is holding the CUE CARD!
How, and more importantly why, are those notes real?
rumble.com...
Rumble (rumble.com...)
Joe Biden Holds Up Notes of Bizarre Detailed Instructions for Him to Follow
1) Note the timestamp of the telegram post is 5:01:23 - and read below:
2) At the 55 second mark in the clip, (EYES ON), Biden shows his personal notes on the back of the cue card:
Bigger
a) Look at the top... "501" Double Underlined!!!...
b) #501
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f946c4 No.20857 📁
Jan 7 2018 22:27:43 (EST)
P_pers: [1] Confirmed.
_ACTION_DBF5Cz-BSY-1_y
FOR GOD & COUNTRY.
SKY FORTRESS ENGAGED>
Q
c) P_pers: [1] Confirmed = Biden's personal note on cue card reverse confirms!
d) Now notice the telegram timesyamp ends in 23 = PAIN and the date of the Rumble video.
...
“YOU take YOUR seat,” advised the guidance, titled, “Offshore Wind Drop-By Sequence of Events.”
“YOU give brief comments,” states another directive.
The script also instructed Biden which reporter to take a question from.
“YOU ask Liz Shuler, President, AFL-CIO, a question,” Biden’s handlers wrote. “YOU Thank participants.”
...
Roe v. Wade is dead.
The fight for life now turns to the States.
Today, the Supreme Court overturned nearly 50 years of bad abortion law: “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.”
The issue of abortion will be left to the States.
...
That’s a long way of getting to Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion.
... This will define Justice Alito’s legacy. (Remember also the legacy of those who worked tirelessly behind the scenes during confirmations, etc. And of the Presidents who appointed them.) It will also be part of the legacy of each Justice who voted with Alito: Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Especially for Kavanaugh. The false attacks of rape and sexual assault during his confirmation were just a precursor to the current threat to his life - and the lives of his wife and young daughters - by an armed leftist ready to die for abortion rights and gun control.
Then there’s Chief Justice John Roberts. He didn’t join his colleagues in the opinion, and instead concurred in the judgment. He argued the right to abortion, and whether to overturn Roe, should have been left for another time: “there is a clear path to deciding this case correctly without overruling Roe all the way down to the studs: recognize that the viability line must be discarded, as the majority rightly does, and leave for another day whether to reject any right to an abortion at all.”
In other words, Justice Roberts would prefer the Court correct its mistakes at another time. The present is inconvenient for him. The majority opinion recognized Roberts’ maneuvering, stating “the concurrence’s most fundamental defect is its failure to offer any principled basis for its approach.”
On the merits, Justice Alito has delivered a thorough and sound opinion, holding that Roe (and Planned Parenthood v. Casey) be overruled because “the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision.” Until Roe, there “was no support in American law for a constitutional right to obtain an abortion. Zero. None.” Certainly not in “federal or state court.” Thus, “Roe was on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided.”
In response to arguments that abortion is a fundamental right not specified in the Constitution, Alito noted that at the time the 14th Amendment was adopted, “three-quarters of states had made abortion a crime at any stage of pregnancy, and the remaining States would soon follow.” Alito was equally dismissive of the claim that stare decisis requires the survival of Roe:
“Stare decisis . . . does not compel unending adherence to Roe’s abuse of judicial authority. Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.”
The dissent from Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan was unconvincing and borderline hysterical. They argued the Court now “says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of.” The phrase “no rights” is particularly inaccurate and egregious (maybe that was the point), as pregnant women have the same rights as anyone else. Or is speech not a right?
originally posted by: FlyingFox