Pfizer Whistleblower Lawsuit Unsealed - 400 Pages Of Evidence

Back in November we learned about a whistle blower who witnessed countless improprieties during the covid-19 vaccine trials conducted by Ventavia, a Pfizer subcontractor. One of the key allegations was that Pfizer withheld information related to vaccine safety data. This is actually not a surprise if you know anything about Pfizer's history. For example:

In 2009, Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion, then the largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States. Pfizer pled guilty to misbranding the painkiller Bextra with "the intent to defraud or mislead", promoting the drug to treat acute pain at dosages the FDA had previously deemed dangerously high. The government alleged that Pfizer had paid kickbacks to compliant doctors and also promoted three other drugs illegally: the antipsychotic Geodon, an antibiotic Zyvox, and the antiepileptic drug Lyrica.

It would appear that Pfizer is attempting to break it's own record now, with the Covid-19 lawsuit. Not only was Brook Jackson a regional director, she had over 15 years of experience. According to Jackson, she had never seen fraud like this before. Between this lawsuit and the court demanded release of 400,000 documents from Pfizer's trials, we may start seeing some justice.

The lawsuit states:

“Defendants concealed violations of both their clinical trial protocol and federal regulations, including falsification of clinical trial documents.

“Due to [the] Defendants’ scheme, millions of Americans have received a misbranded vaccination which is potentially not as effective as represented.”

The core allegations of Jackson’s lawsuit include claims against Ventavia and Pfizer of:

Making or using false records or statements to cause claims to be paid.
Presentation of false and/or fraudulent claims.
Making or using false records or statements material to false and/or fraudulent claims.
Retaliation.

“From 2020 to the present, Defendants [Ventavia and Pfizer] knowingly made, used, or caused to be made or used, false records or statements that were material to false and/or fraudulent claims paid or approved by the United States [Department of Defense, or DoD]. These false records or statements include the clinical trial protocol Pfizer submitted to the United States and the falsified source documents and data behind Defendants’ trial results and EUA application.

“By creating and carrying out their fraudulent schemes, Defendants knowingly and repeatedly violated … the False Claims Act. Defendants’ false records were material to Pfizer’s claims for payment for the vaccine at issue. The United States DoD would not have paid Pfizer if it knew that the clinical trial protocol was not complied with by Defendants, because the protocol violations call the integrity and validity of both the entire clinical trial and Pfizer’s EUA into question.

SOURCE


Pfizer has completed ignored victims of it's Covid-19 drug trials.




BMJ review of Pfizer Whistleblower

Pfizer's History Of Corruption

Complete List Of Pfizer Drug Lawsuits

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I don't want to get my hopes up because without willing prosecutors nothing can ever happen, but proving fraud in the approval process would be the first step toward actual justice IMO.

The liability shield and contract need to be voided and that's the only way I see it happening. It still needs a champion with the political clout to get the wheels in motion and I don't see that happening unless they can spin it against Republicans in the midterms.

I think it will be a victory if we can manage to keep the vax off the childhood schedule. Anything beyond that is a bonus. Every child spared the unnecessary risk is a win.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Thank you for your thorough and informative threads!!!

This is going to continue and the entire plannedemic scam will be exposed, leading to the corruption of Big Pharma, CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, right on down the line to the politicians.

The crimes against humanity orchestrated globally in 2020-2022 will go down in history, no one escapes this.

a reply to: elementalgrove
Done?
What like Hillary’s crimes, Biden’s families crimes, voter fraud and now the pharma giants that own all the politicians
Really?
Swept away on the next tide and nothing will be done, ever
Proof 911 was an inside job ever comes out, watch, nothing will be done, nothing
Talk, talk talk

A lot of damage to human beings has been done, we need to get the darn emergency act Struck down, then the law sues can be move forward and the numbers of cases can be reveled.

Is a darn shame, then the senile crappy biden just extended the darn emergency act protecting the criminals.

It's all about profits. Money is more important than peoples' lives. It's that simple. Drug makers have fooled not just the public, but the medical establishment, including physicians and health care workers of every stripe, pharmacists, and insurance companies.

John Abramson is a family doctor and a faculty member at Harvard Medical School. He has served as an unpaid consultant to the FBI and Department of Justice, including in a case that resulted in the largest criminal fine in U.S. history.

Big Pharma’s Goals Versus Medical Ethics

a reply to: elementalgrove

Imagine the wailing and nashing of teeth of the hordes of useful idiots who shrilly attacked all of us who asked questions.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: elementalgrove
Done?
What like Hillary’s crimes, Biden’s families crimes, voter fraud and now the pharma giants that own all the politicians
Really?
Swept away on the next tide and nothing will be done, ever
Proof 911 was an inside job ever comes out, watch, nothing will be done, nothing
Talk, talk talk

I will give you this much, if there is no red wave, if they globalist scum remain I will concede that my optimism is misplaced.

If there is a red wave, I believe all of the information that has been ignored will be applied and we will see justice manifest.

originally posted by: Madviking
a reply to: elementalgrove

Imagine the wailing and nashing of teeth of the hordes of useful idiots who shrilly attacked all of us who asked questions.

As the damage from vaccines continues to mount, the collective rage, I feel will be unstoppable.

For the normies, they have to realize that there are significant amounts of adverse reactions, than they will have to realize it happened to their loved ones, then possibly themselves. Once we hit that level of awareness it will be game over.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Hi, me again. Yes, you knew that I'd be here, didn't you.

Just to make sure that everyone is aware, yes, there was a whistleblower who made some serious accusations, and no, I'm not going to say that they were fake.

Surprised?

The problem is that the majority of these accusations involve bad lab practices at a sub contractor. Including breaches of clinical waste disposal protocols and understaffing.

There were also multiple alleged breaches of blind protocols, and alleged breaches of data privacy.

All serious allegations, and all things which I believe the subcontractor should be strung up for if true.

What there wasn't was any evidence of malpractice in regards to vax safety data, or any accusations of a coverup. In fact all of the breaches were material in nature, and did not involve any conspiracy worth its salt.

These accusations were also wholly independent of anything else that the OP mentioned.

Here's a link

Link

a reply to: elementalgrove

The accusations don't actually relate to "vax damage". They're mostly health and safety violations at a sub contractor's lab, and accusations that the private data of participants wasn't properly secured, in breach of blind protocols.

Link

Nothing from this lawsuit will address anything that anti-vaxxers are hoping for.

If anything this is more a matter for the management at the contractor's lab to deal with.

“...The United States DoD would not have paid Pfizer if it knew that the clinical trial protocol was not complied with.....

But what IF they did know?

There may potentially be some very powerful people in the Government, not only the drug companies, that will be doing whatever it takes to ensure that it is not proven that they knew all along. Making sure the drug company does not go down would be the best way to save themselves. Stop the trail in the beginning, before it begins to lead to them.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

If anything this is more a matter for the management at the contractor's lab to deal with.

Are the Pharmaceutical Companies not required to verify the findings made by these supposed sub-contractors? The giant middleman gets to collect all of the profits without facing any of the consequences?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: elementalgrove

The accusations don't actually relate to "vax damage". They're mostly health and safety violations at a sub contractor's lab, and accusations that the private data of participants wasn't properly secured, in breach of blind protocols.

Link

Nothing from this lawsuit will address anything that anti-vaxxers are hoping for.

If anything this is more a matter for the management at the contractor's lab to deal with.

You're just as guilty as big pharma. Don't think you'll be escaping Nuremberg.

originally posted by: BrokenCircles

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

If anything this is more a matter for the management at the contractor's lab to deal with.

Are the Pharmaceutical Companies not required to verify the findings made by these supposed sub-contractors? The giant middleman gets to collect all of the profits without facing any of the consequences?

Using a middle man is part of the business model. The fact they continue to use ventavia after their history of corruption reveals the bigger picture. It doesn't change the fact Pfizer makes the poison and knew about the flawed data before they pushed the drug. Theres still plenty of things they can be sued for.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

The accusations are in regards to corrupt practices within Pfizer and their transparency.

The vaccine damage is mounting and as Pfizer failed in their attempt to cover up the damage, they are being forced to release their data and the truth will inevitably be brought to light.

originally posted by: BrokenCircles

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

If anything this is more a matter for the management at the contractor's lab to deal with.

Are the Pharmaceutical Companies not required to verify the findings made by these supposed sub-contractors? The giant middleman gets to collect all of the profits without facing any of the consequences?

The complaint that's been lodged is about laboratory health and safety and data protection at a privately run lab.

There are no consequences for Pfizer because these aren't Pfizer's breaches, and they don't effect vax safety. They're being accused of improperly disposing of clinical waste, and of not properly protecting the data of trial participants, not covering up heart attacks or whatever it is that the anti-vaxxers think is happening these days.

There will be no consequences for Pfizer, because none of the breaches involve Pfizer.

It like McDonalds won't face any consequences if farmer who sells them beef starts getting frisky with the Friesians.

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: AaarghZombies

The accusations are in regards to corrupt practices within Pfizer and their transparency.

The vaccine damage is mounting and as Pfizer failed in their attempt to cover up the damage, they are being forced to release their data and the truth will inevitably be brought to light.

No, they aren't.

The accusations relate to a subcontractor breaching lab protocols.

Link

a reply to: AaarghZombies

From the OP...

link

“From 2020 to the present, Defendants knowingly made, used, or caused to be made or used, false records or statements that were material to false and/or fraudulent claims paid or approved by the United States DoD. These false records or statements include the clinical trial protocol Pfizer submitted to the United States and the falsified source documents and data behind Defendants’ trial results and EUA application.

By creating and carrying out their fraudulent schemes, Defendants knowingly and repeatedly violated Section 3729(a)(1)(B) of the False Claims Act. 286. Defendants’ false records were material to Pfizer’s claims for payment for the vaccine at issue. The United States DoD would not have paid Pfizer if it knew that the clinical trial protocol was not complied with by Defendants, because the protocol violations call the integrity and validity of both the entire clinical trial and Pfizer’s EUA into question.

Defendants’ false records also went to the very essence of the bargain the United States contracted for. DoD contracted to purchase vaccines found effective by a valid clinical trial conducted according to the protocol submitted by Pfizer. The integrity of the entire clinical trial was compromised by the trial protocol violations, false source documents, and the false data that resulted, which calls the vaccine’s EUA into question. Had the United States DoD known of Defendants’ false records, it would not have paid Pfizer. 288. Defendants’ use, or causation of use, of material false records was a foreseeable factor in the United States DoD’s loss and a consequence of Defendants’ schemes. By virtue of Defendants’ actions, the United States DoD has suffered actual damages and is entitled to recover treble damages plus a civil monetary penalty for each false and/or fraudulent claim.”

Companies learned a long time ago that subcontracting much of their work provides a layer of plausible deniability. If charges are filed, it will take years- or decades to come to trial. Even IF Pfizer were found guilty in any way, the fines levied would be a miniscule amount compared to the profits they've raked in.
The only good thing that could come out of it would be if more people started questioning everything they're told and stopped believing the government always has our best interests at heart.