NEW - VIDEO, A VIEW FROM A BOAT

a reply to: BBF521

You seem to have problems with reading comprehension

The plane did not sever the beams it broke the welds and bolts holding the column trees together

So you dont think an aircraft can penetrate a building?

July 1945 - B25 bomber used as a transport crashed into Empire State Building. Impact blew hole 30 x 24 in side of building

ESB was built of riveted steel skeleton with masonry of cut stone cladding 11 inches thick

www.youtube.com...

One of two engines went completely through building to punch out other side and land on roof of another building

Thats 2 holes in structure

Try reading this - failure analysis of World Trade Center

www.nist.gov...

a reply to: firerescue
No engine on any plane can sever a 36 x 18 with 6 inch wall thickness,Stone shatters steel does not.

a reply to: firerescue

Nothing claimed that happened on 9/11 could make the slag on those 36x18 6 inch wall thickness.Nothing.Cutting charges could like butter,But that is not what has been claimed.Thermite could,but that is not whats been claimed .No fire or plane could shake their integrity.A plane wing can be severed from a light pole or a tree,A steeple on a church.

But you are saying ,It has to cut through the outer ring box beams (impossible),but we will say it happened.also magically not loosing any energy.Then.
The angle the plane entered,show there was several floors involved,that means they had to cut through the concrete and rebar floor 75 feet of it each floor to reach the core columns. Then after it already had to cut the outer box beams,Then magically carry enough energy after passing through all that concrete rebar,and then magically not loose any more energy. And sever the absolute strongest part of the building. .Thats what you are telling me

Okay you finally Got me. You swayed me, i am a believer.

a reply to: BBF521

At the speed the aircraft were traveling (530 mph - WTC North Tower, 590 mph= WTC South Tower) everything on that aircraft becomes a projectile with the speed of bullet

The thousands of gallons of fuel in the wings acted like a battering ram destroying everything in front of them

The jet engines are massive pieces of machinery built of high strength alloys which will smash anything in there path

You clearly dont understand the forces involved in the impact

Ever seen pieces of straw imbedded in wood by a tornado, now image being made of metal traveling twice as fast '
which quadruples the impact forces ..........

a reply to: firerescue

A high powered bullet travels 1800 miles per hour give or take .And wouldn't make it through the first 2 inch thick box beans much less the 6 inch plate on the core .Either would a naval rail gun.as far as bullets anti tank bullet about it.
No part of any air craft made on this earth by man at 600 miles per hour could sever any of the 64 36x18 inch box beam with a wall thickness of 6 inches.And at 600 mph most airliners would start to come apart just from the air speed.let alone crashing into a 500,000,000 ton building.

a reply to: firerescue

The second plane came out the other side,and was said it severed the core columns which allowed the collapse to even start.
Without that claim made a long long time ago ,the building would not have collapsed even they knew that hence the claim.The floors would have just pancaked .Regardless of what happened up top ,none of what went on up there, can explain the severed core columns with dripping slag.

That is the most important piece of information that needs to be investigated.Something severed the columns in the basement cleanly and in 10 seconds.You keep wanting to ignore that fact.

a reply to: BBF521

It's obvious to me the structural integrity of that building clearly wasn't phased
in the slightest by the impact. The plane hits where the engines would completely
miss the massive inner columns. For whatever reason a lot of lies became history
that day. However I think everyone can agree on one thing in regards to 911.

It proved there are some very wicked scary people living on this planet.
And you only have to be in their way to fall victim to them.

a reply to: Saloon
Salute! Could not have said it better,

a reply to: BBF521

That is the most important piece of information that needs to be investigated.Something severed the columns in the basement cleanly and in 10 seconds.You keep wanting to ignore that fact.

The fact is that the core columns were cut by iron workers using thermal lances during the cleanup of the site there are numerous video and pictures of the columns being cut and removed from the site

Rather long description of cleanup process

www.metabunk.org...

Video of the cleanup

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

Pay no attention to the men with torches ..........

a reply to: BBF521

Did you bother to look at the analysis of the WTC ?

Shows damage to all the impact floors in both towers

The WTC was a tube within a tube - 60 % of the loads were in the exterior columns When the planes hit it compromised the Structural integrity of the building by removing large section of the external columns

The fuel load in the wings traveling at 500 mph + acted as battering rams smashing the interior columns along with wings spars and internal structure of the wings

a reply to: firerescue

I read it years ago sir.back way back in 2004-2006 when i used to come to this site back then. engineers and pilots for truth.
dont worry about me you believe what you believe and i will do the same

salute!

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Okay to see the truth in this video you have to break it down frame by frame starting at 2.09 finishing at 2.11 it is deceiving because there are multiple frames that make up 2.09 - 2.10 so you have to be precise and go back and forward quite a lot of times before you catch everything. First frame of 2.09 you see the plane just before it hits take notice of the line on the right hand side of the building. Second frame at 2.09 the plane disapears through the black smoke. Third frame at 2.09 you will see a hazy shape on the front of the building. Frame four at 2.09 you will see a white shape on the front of the building, it took me ages to catch these images.
First frame at 2.10 you will see puffs of smoke in front of the building and a puff of smoke on the side where I said to look earlier, no sign of plane or explosion yet. Frame two at 2.10 you will see more puffs of smoke in front of building and at side, looks a bit like a face, still no explosion or sign of plane. Frame three at 2.10 bigger puffs of smoke looks like somthing exploded from inside. 2.11 Big fuffs of smoke. Be patient guys the truth is there to see if you look long and hard enough x

a reply to: andz2022
Keep the analysis coming.

a reply to: BBF521


Okay so to see exact moment of detination look at 0.18 in first two frames there is no line or mark on side of building. Third frame of 0.18 you see the ignition on the side of the building this becomes the dark line.
First frame of 0.19 you see a small dark mark at ignition point, there are two more frames in 0.19.
0.20 shows public
0.21 you will see a white puff of smoke at ignition point, Second frame at 0,21 public, Third frame of 0.21 public.
0.22 First frame unclear, Second frame Line appears for first time, Third frame at 0.22 Line is darker
0.23 The line is clear all the way through from this point.
You really have to creep forwrd minute bit by minute bit to catch all the frames
But somthing happened to create this dark line at the exact point of impact.

a reply to: andz2022

In that video and many other videos all show the impossible.

from 2:07 to 2:12 .in very slow mo is ,and has always deified physics since first analyzed back in the days.
And,To a man,2:09 to 2:10.5 is impossible.

a reply to: BBF521
Also in slow motion at 0.25 you can see the detination happen at front of building its in line with the dark line on side of building, a clear puff of smoke can be seen. There were no planes, if you examine this video you see what's hidden in plain sight. If you accept this video on face value you will miss all the evidence that is staring you in the face, the video is a compilation spliced together with CGI. I can understand that some people will believe everything they see on Television, but not trying to see an alternative truth will keep us ignorant of what is being done to us.

a reply to: BBF521

www.youtube.com... There are multiple frames at 0.16 if you freeze frame in slow mo then I would like someone to explain how a plane with aluminium wings can disapear into a reinforced concrete building without exploding on the outside. You can see the plane has totally disapeared into the building, has left barely no damage at entry point, only a few fuffs of smoke can be seen at this point, then explodes from within. It does my head in that people have been duped so easily

a reply to: andz2022

The plane is aluminum, but it’s also 129,000 pounds at OEW. Add fuel, cargo, and passengers, and even a fairly empty flight is pushing 200,000+ pounds. No reinforced concrete wall, less than 10 or 15 feet thick is going to stop that much weight. The Sandia test stopped an F-4 on a rocket sled, but that was a 10+ foot thick wall, mounted on absorbers.

An aircraft is not just a hollow aluminum tube. There’s a C keel beam under the belly that’s basically a steel I beam that will act as a battering ram, along with all the ribs and spars.

a reply to: Zaphod58 The wings would have broke of on the outside of the building not disapeared into the building. Watch the vids in slow mo freeze frame and you will see the truth instead of trying to prove a lie

a reply to: Zaphod58

www.youtube.com... freeze frame at 0.06 and convince me that the plane has entered the building fully in tact. If you look hard enough there is a hidden frame that shows the tip of supposed plane hitting building and the explosion before it disapears within but it is very hard to find, ive only managed to see it once. There are frames missing and hidden if you think and look logically. Look for what they don't want you to see