Justin Trudeau About To Commit HIGH TREASON??

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Justin Trudeau has stated that he might accept Michigan's aid. If they brought American forces onto Canadian soil to repress a peaceful, constitutionally protected protest this would constitute HIGH TREASON. I am hoping appropriate authorities act and arrest this tyrant before it gets bloody.



Look at that gloating smirk as he threatens his own people!

'High Treason' is legally defined in Canada:

(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

(a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;

(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or

(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.

Canadian gov site source: www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca...

Is Trudeau going to jail? Former Royal Canadian Air Force pilot and scientist, who is at least somewhat versed in Canadian law, explains why he believes Trudeau is going to prison.

rumble.com...

originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
...
Is Trudeau going to jail?
...
l

Nah. Klaus and George got his back. He good.

a reply to: incoserv

Maybe...before now I would have agreed with you but a lot is shaking up in this country right now.

originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
a reply to: incoserv

Maybe...before now I would have agreed with you but a lot is shaking up in this country right now.

I sincerely hope so. I have little confidence in humanity now, but I hope I'm wrong.

See my response to the recent "Perfect Storm Brewing" post.
:

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Is Trudeau going to jail?

Unlikely, but if he does go down, Whitmer should be held accountable along with him.

ETA: I just realized I need to clarify the above statement.
"Unlikely, but if he does go down, Whitmer should be held accountable along with him... if she aids him by sending American forces across the border.

a reply to: incoserv

I lost a great deal of faith in humanity myself, until recently. A good cause up against evil--esp. with men, women and children of races and creeds united in love and freedom--is bringing a lot of good people out of the woodwork to help.

International border, Michigan doesn't have the legal authority to send police across the border unless they are invited for an investigation.

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Exercise your fundamental right of assembly peacefully and cooperate
with the directions of police.

Kinda overlooked that bud....
So you support violation of the Canadian constitution....
Check

originally posted by: mikell
International border, Michigan doesn't have the legal authority to send police across the border unless they are invited for an investigation.

Ya ummm not correct in any way whena state of emergency has been declared.
My guess is these leaders of the unconstitutional movement did take into consideration.
Sad you chose to follow people that can't or refuse to follow the law.
Maybe do some research and look into that.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

And people wonder why the majority of the world just wants to move on. Ya know maybe help rebuild the consumer base to help keep and provide more job opportunities.
But hey WTF do I know? Besides the fact that completely blocking that was completely counterproductive to your perceived cause.....

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Exercise your fundamental right of assembly peacefully and cooperate
with the directions of police.

Kinda overlooked that bud....
So you support violation of the Canadian constitution....
Check

What would be a violation of the Canadian Constitution ?
You don't know , do you ?
Hint , there has been none performed by the citizens .

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

One step in, never leave.

Bye bye Canada.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: mikell
International border, Michigan doesn't have the legal authority to send police across the border unless they are invited for an investigation.

Ya ummm not correct in any way whena state of emergency has been declared.
My guess is these leaders of the unconstitutional movement did take into consideration.
Sad you chose to follow people that can't or refuse to follow the law.
Maybe do some research and look into that.

Since when did Canada fall under the State of Michigan's rule ?
Not in this reality .
Perhaps yours ?

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Exercise your fundamental right of assembly peacefully and cooperate
with the directions of police.

Kinda overlooked that bud....
So you support violation of the Canadian constitution....
Check

What would be a violation of the Canadian Constitution ?
You don't know , do you ?
Hint , there has been none performed by the citizens .

You could continue to try to throw your own bias around trying to get a rise, or you could look it up yourself.
Emergencies Act
R.S.C., 1985, c. 22 (4th Supp.)

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: mikell
International border, Michigan doesn't have the legal authority to send police across the border unless they are invited for an investigation.

Ya ummm not correct in any way whena state of emergency has been declared.
My guess is these leaders of the unconstitutional movement did take into consideration.
Sad you chose to follow people that can't or refuse to follow the law.
Maybe do some research and look into that.

Since when did Canada fall under the State of Michigan's rule ?
Not in this reality .
Perhaps yours ?

Funny that Americans believe that the laws here apply there.
You may possibly fall under that realm.
The law is clearly defined and why Mr.T gave zero mucks about this as after a time completely failed the constitutional rights granted. Done by design or not doesn't matter.
The wiss Convoys failed.
Now move on and go to work as most of us have been doing.
Get a pair and get with it and properly express concern through proper channels and not hold cities hostage.
But hey if you like pissing off people then you do you man.

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Time to go to work kids.
The others are trying to do so but some have a problem with going back to normalcy.....
Then complain when normal is gone.......hmmm wonder why it keeps being prolonged???!

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Exercise your fundamental right of assembly peacefully and cooperate
with the directions of police.

Kinda overlooked that bud....
So you support violation of the Canadian constitution....
Check

What would be a violation of the Canadian Constitution ?
You don't know , do you ?
Hint , there has been none performed by the citizens .

You could continue to try to throw your own bias around trying to get a rise, or you could look it up yourself.
Emergencies Act
R.S.C., 1985, c. 22 (4th Supp.)

At least I am not making statements out of ignorance .
1) Governors cannot order any force into a foreign country . Only the President can do such .
2) You do know what a State of Emergency means and where it applies , yes ? No ?

Denying ignorance .
Why ?
The worst is folks saying stuff they don't know .

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Time to go to work kids.
The others are trying to do so but some have a problem with going back to normalcy.....
Then complain when normal is gone.......hmmm wonder why it keeps being prolonged???!

See my post right above this one .

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

OK, I'm a little confused.

Definition #1 does not apply; no one is threatening or trying to harm the Queen.

Definition #2 wouldn't seem to apply, assuming that Trudeau is Commander in Chief of the military a'la the USA. As Commander in Chief, he is the military and therfore cannot declare war on himself, by definition.

Definition #3 is the only one left, and it speaks of assisting an enemy who is hostile toward Canada. Is the Michigan National Guard engaged in hostilities toward Canada?

On the other hand, Whitmer does not have the authority to send the National Guard to another sovereign country; that would be treason for her. Only the President can order US military onto another country's sovereign soil. As long as this remains a Canadian issue (does not spill across the border), it is not within the pervue of the states to interfere; such is strictly and specifically prohibited on our Constitution. Trudeau can ask all he wants; she cannot do anything about Canadian activities.

I have no love for Trudeau, but I think you're grasping at straws here.

There is one takeaway from this story, though: Apparently Trudeau cannot muster enough support for his government inside Canada to put down this protest. If he could, why would he even bother to ask for outside help?

TheRedneck

a reply to: Allaroundyou

Ya ummm not correct in any way whena state of emergency has been declared.

Whitmer can call out the Michigan National Guard at her discretion when needed in Michigan, by declaring a state of emergency in Michigan. She can send Michigan National Guard units to other states in the USA if they ask for help.

Whitmer cannot declare a state of emergency in Canada. Trudeau declaring a state of emergency in Canada has no bearing on what Michigan can or cannot do; Michigan is not a province of Canada. Whitmer cannot send troops to Canada, unless requested by the US President.

You seem to have an issue with understanding that Canada is not part of the USA. Canada is a sovereign country, bound by it's own Constitution and not the US Constitution. Canadian law means nothing in the USA, just as US law means nothing in Canada.

TheRedneck