cancer cure

originally posted by: loveguy
one study among many

Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells. This may be related to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways by ivermectin through PAK1 kinase. On the other hand, ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs.

🙏❤

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Menbendazole was used here to cure cancer, it’s a anti parasitic drug like ivermectin.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
But for real this time. And I know this site has a history of people making claims and then nothing ever comes of it.
But this is not some fringe rumor.

www.sfgate.com...

The one-time treatment involves collecting the patient’s own T cells, white blood cells key to the immune system, and genetically changing them in the lab so that they will find and attack cancer cells. The modified cells are given back to the patient through IV.

Over time, researchers said, the modified cells evolved, many turning into “helper” cells that work with the cancer-killing cells. Helper cells eventually became dominant in both patients.

Study author J. Joseph Melenhorst said they were able to isolate and analyze the cells using new technologies, which gave them “very good insight” into how they persisted in the patients’ bodies.

Dr. Armin Ghobadi of Washington University in St. Louis, an expert in gene and cellular immunotherapy for cancer, called the findings “incredible.” Though the word “cure” is rarely used in cancer, he said it appears these patients were “most likely” cured.

It took over 10 years but it seems to have worked.

What say you ats are we going to see a real cancer cure in our lifetimes??

I think my four year old neice may have had this/or a very similar experimental gene therapy being developed by a US Uni, at Alderhey aroiund 2018/19- she had a very rare agressive brain tumor type due to some gene anomaly/programing malfunction that meant it was always going to reoccur and the last two years of surgeries and chemo had failed.

She's now a happy, healthy seven year old kid following the treatmeant and has been cancer free/not had to have any chemo or surgery since.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Wouldn't it be crazy if President Joe Biden really could take credit for this Cancer Cure breakthrough?

I'm sure it's no coincidence that TODAY, he officially took control of the "Cancer Moonshot" initiative once again.

See it all here: www.cancer.gov...

Absolutely not a Coincidence , He is pulling out the big guns to save his Presidency.

I had wondered that if (hypothetically) the 1% were told that science was sooo close to a vaccine against cancer (something even that even the1%’s billions can’t protect them from), but couldn’t make that final leap to finish the vaccine without an enormous pool of test subjects, what might that 1% do to provide that pool of testees?

a reply to: Scotchjimmy
👍

originally posted by: rickymouse
Sounds like a good treatment may be in the making. BUT....I would rather not get cancer in the first place, that is why I spend so much time researching food chemistry and the chemistry of some of the more common chemistries used on food production.

Lowering the risk to one fifth would take out most of the cancer incidents. It is much better to not get cancer than to get it and pay megabucks to get rid of it or to go through hell from the radiation and chemotherapy.

But this could possibly work in preventing cancer from taking hold in the body. Since many if not most have cancer cells residing in their body, wouldn't a possible preventative measure be to use the procedure to help attack the current cancer cells and eliminate them before they can become malignant? I for one am very interested in this procedure as a preventative measure AND a cure.

This is a conspiracy website right? Therefore you shouldn't be surprised to learn that 'cancer' was cured, along with a lot of other diseases back in the 1920s by a bloke called Royal Raymond Rife, using a new type of microscope that he designed and built, so that he could see live virus, and bacteria, and when he realised that they are two different forms of the same thing, pleomorphic bacteria, and then noticing that each type of disease has a specific resonant frequency, and if he applied the exact correct frequency to the specific virus/bacterium/cell/organism, etc he could make it explode, killing it, and curing the disease. needless to say the big drug companies didn't like him. I have a book right here on my desk 'the cancer cure that worked. Fifty years of suppression' by Barry Lynes (first published 1987).

but yeah, cancer still kills millions of people a year.
go figure.

originally posted by: StoutBroux

originally posted by: rickymouse
Sounds like a good treatment may be in the making. BUT....I would rather not get cancer in the first place, that is why I spend so much time researching food chemistry and the chemistry of some of the more common chemistries used on food production.

Lowering the risk to one fifth would take out most of the cancer incidents. It is much better to not get cancer than to get it and pay megabucks to get rid of it or to go through hell from the radiation and chemotherapy.

But this could possibly work in preventing cancer from taking hold in the body. Since many if not most have cancer cells residing in their body, wouldn't a possible preventative measure be to use the procedure to help attack the current cancer cells and eliminate them before they can become malignant? I for one am very interested in this procedure as a preventative measure AND a cure.

Everyone has a cancer cell in their body at all times, our immune system destroys those cells usually. But with all the unnatural food additives and lack of proper nutrients in some of the foods, the cancer avoids being destroyed. Cancer incidents and deaths are going up again since 2017, they declined a little for about five years. This is in the USA. The number of people smoking dropped down quite a bit, and the incidents matched the drop of population during the time before 2017, but the population is dropping more here yet cancer rates are getting higher again. Blaming smoking for cancer was true, but they made it sound like tobacco caused a lot of cancer, blaming tobacco made them focus only on that instead of looking at the other stuff they put in our foods. They should have been broadening their research on identifying reasons for cancer instead of feeling smug and blaming everything on Tobacco.

CAR-T therapies have proven very effective for many patients with leukemia (cancer of the blood), as in the story cited. They've not to date been very effective against other cancers and most solid tumours, although there's a great deal of work into making them more so.

For example, against pancreatic cancer: medicalxpress.com...

Some recent research into improving cancer T cell and other immunotherapies:
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
phys.org...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...
medicalxpress.com...

There are of course many other approaches also being developed, as well as prevention and improved early diagnosis.

a reply to: EvilAxis

Yeah, here is an estimation of the upper level of cost of the treatment. I am sure that most cases will cost two thirds of this price.

CAR-T therapy can cost as much as $375,000 for a one-time treatment. That estimate does not include hospital stays and other related expenses.