It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Pay yearly, or don't and nothing will happen to you...
originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: Fatboy527
The Liberal progressives would love the idea everywhere to remove the right to defend yourself from home invasions or intruders trying to steal, kidnap people, families.
They would rather you be charged for just defending yourself and family.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: rickymouse
I can only use my weapon in Mi against.
1. Robbery
2.Rape.
3.Home invasion
4. Car Jacking.
In your house w tv running out the back? You go to jail if you shoot anyone.
See you h m and inside...you aren't in danger.
Shoot em..he could sue you for shooting him.
Sad, but true.
originally posted by: Fatboy527
I agree. I used a gun to stop a home invasion in my home several years ago. I live with the fact each day that I took a mans life. Fastest 40 seconds in my life....Door kicked in, all the while I'm on the phone with 911..they recorded it all. The man had a loaded 12 gauge pump. I fired 4 rounds at that intruder and 5 more at the one standing by their car. 1st man dropped about 15 feet outside my front door, 2nd guy was caught about a mile away. He wrecked because I hit him twice neither was lethal. I was never charged in fact the sheriffs I dealt with were in complete support of me defending my life & that of my wife. I would do it all again tomorrow to defend me & mine. California is just a crap hole full of upper class a-holes and homeless people and incredibly stupid politicians. I like calling North Carolina home. For the record they followed me home from a gun show earlier that day. I guess they thought I was an easy mark...they choose poorly. A reply to: rickymouse
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Pay yearly, or don't and nothing will happen to you...
From what I read people who don't comply will get a civil fine. That is what the second quote is saying, it will not be a criminal offense but it isn't like nothing will happen.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: rickymouse
Don't know anything about that. I doubt one city would cover that although if the ball got rolling...
I was just saying that absence of criminal charges doesn't mean absence of some repercussion.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Here
San Jose passes first U.S. law requiring gun owners to get liability insurance and pay annual fee
The liability insurance would cover losses or damages resulting from any accidental use of the firearm, including death, injury, or property damage, according to the ordinance. If a gun is stolen or lost, the owner of the firearm would be considered liable until the theft or loss is reported to authorities.
Ok, don't agree with that.... so I kept reading, and there is this...
However, gun owners who don't have insurance won't lose their guns or face any criminal charges, the mayor said.
Sometimes these laws are too funny.
Pay yearly, or don't and nothing will happen to you, looks like California is at least consistent with their insanity.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: Madviking
Yep. But not if he is running away or out the down the block in a car.
That's assault, attempted murder. Seeing them in...or running away...you can't use deadly force if not in threat of death.
Stuff is stuff. You will go to jail 1st. Absolutely.