a reply to:
anonentity
Where do all these odd ways of thinking come from?
There's so much to unpack, I don't even know if I am able to make a good effort, but let's try anyway. I disagree with Yoda, i think there is trying.
The next generation deleted
Star Trek?
First of all, are you too lazy to type the word 'is', let alone two words like 'has been' or perhaps 'is being'? It's hard to know what you mean, if
you don't adhere to english rules when you are trying to communicate an unclear idea.
Secondly, a generation can't be 'deleted', as you put it. What do you mean by 'deleted'? Computer files can be deleted, not anything living. There are
other words for what can be done or happen to living beings. It's dehumanizing language, I advice to avoid using such if you want to reach people or
affect people's human side.
Thirdly, generations can't be 'deleted' ANYWAY, even if that word could be applied - people don't stop living just because something is done to bodies
or a 'body pool'. They will just incarnate later, or some other planet, etc. They are alive before incarnation, during incarnation and after
incarnation, so I don't see how a 'generation' (whatever you really mean by this) can be 'deleted'.
Fourthly, what do you mean by 'the next generation', exactly? When does a generation start and end? How many people are you even talking about?
Fifth, abortion is not 'deleting' of anything. This world is already overpopulated, it could USE a bit of 'population control', if you want to call it
that. I am not talking about anything unethical, either - just refuse to REPRODUCE for awhile, until the amount of people on this planet stops
expanding and starts contracting, and then continue doing it when the number of people reaches acceptable and sustainable levels.
I am aware that this planet is not 'physically overpopulated' - people could very comfortably be packed in Australia and everyone could have enough
living space to reach comfort. However, it's clear that this many this crazy people create way too many problems - the cities are growing to be too
big, the buildings are too tall, and there's too much poverty and misery, and it's only logical that with fewer people there would be fewer problems
as well. This may sound harsh, but just as a thought experiment; if all poor and miserable people left this planet in an instant, there would not be
poverty or misery anymore here.
..number of abortions caused by the Vax.
Oh, now it's 'the Vax', with a capital first letter, too! Have you ever seen a dictionary, by the way? I know it's an archaic, odd object in the
modern times, but I am pretty sure the word 'Vax' is not in any of them, and even if it is, it's most likely not spelled with a vapital 'V'. Why use
the masonic spelling when you can use the actual, correct spelling, that is "vaccine"?
Also, there's not only one vaccine, there are several, so which one is 'the Vax' in your opinion?
To be even more accurate, they are not really even vaccinations, because they do not function as vaccinations, they are just 'designated' as such.
It's like calling a cat a dog, and everyone thinking it's a dog, when it's clearly a cat.
As someone said, they're called vaccinations because vaccinations can be mandated. Vaccination is supposed to provide immunity to something, which
these concoctions clearly do not do.
In any case, what's wrong about abortions? Isn't it a GOOD thing that overpopulation is curbed, fewer people are born? Traffic jams can't happen as
much with fewer people, crowding during rush hour, people blocking your way, etc. happens less, when there are fewer people.
I never understand this worshipping of reproduction on an overpopulated planet. Babies are not special, there are enough people in this world already,
it doesn't need more right now. Do you really want to increase the amount of poor people living in slums and dying from starvation? Do you want to
increase the amount of homeless kids falling asleep in busy traffic in Manila after sniffing some glue?
What's wrong with people when abortion (a COMPLETELY ethical and harmless procedure, at least as much as removing a tumor would be, it's just organic
mass, not a living being, when done correctly) a crime, but breeding like rabbits or banana flies is seen as something to be encouraged?
Do I have to explain again how the soul isn't yet attached to the body of a fetus, and it only visits the fetus from time to time to 'practice' and to
get used to it, and thus, if abortion is done when a soul is not visiting, and it's made clear that this fetus is not going to be viable for an
incarnation, the soul won't even bother coming anymore, THERE IS NO ETHICAL PROBLEM with it?
Abortion is NOT murder, because the soul has not attached to it yet, the silver cord is not yet connected, it's a 'point of return' until the first
BREATH is taken, then the silver cord attaches, and after that first breath, it will be murder, and 100% unethical to kill the baby at that point.
Removing a fetus is like removing a cancerous tumor, it's just biological mass. There's no murder or killing involved. Do you call a stillborn a
murder as well? No. It's just a soul that decided to NOT incarnate after all, there's nothing sad about it, it's just biological mass. The only
'sadness' is ego-based selfish greed of 'wanting to have a baby', it's not anything like 'wanting to do something good for humanity or this
planet'.
Is worst, the able population between 18 and 49 are dropping like flies,
Do they even teach english in schools anymore? Do you really think beginning a sentence with "Is" is completely good and correct? Do you think 'Is
worst' is english?
Do you even know about tenses and conjugation?
Have you ever heard of the word 'it'?
The correct way to write that - at least I think, because I can't be sure WHAT you intended to write when you do not adhere to the rules of the
language - would be "It is worse than that" or "It's worse than that", or maybe even "It gets worse".
At least you used a comma, though. That fact can't be applauded enough in modern times, when people seem to have forgotten that punctuation even
exists.
What do you mean by 'the able population'? Able to do what? To think and choose to not work for an insane system? Are you thinking about people as
just some automatons and worker drones, whose philosophy, lifestyle, thoughts, opinions, choices, desires, goals and viewpoints do not matter - they
are either 'able worker robots' or 'some disabled bums'?
In any case, between 18 and 49 what? You are not using units here, so you could be talking about strawberry pies for all know. Are you talking about
'ages' or 'years'?
Why such arbitrary numbers anyway?
Also, how does a fly drop? I don't think I have ever seen a fly spontaniously just drop. Why are you talking about 'dropping flies', when usually
flies don't drop, they just fly and then land on some wall or window, and keep buzzing and flying about until your nerves are shot or until you just
let it out or something.
Flies very rarely 'drop', as far as I am concerned - is this a common occurrence in your life? Perhaps there's something wrong with your environment
or breathing air if every time you see a fly, it just 'drops'. I mean, it would have to happen really often for this sentiment to make any sense.