I wanted to echo the obvious concern of others here. Any time you have a scientific body that has to spin their findings it's probably not a good idea
to just take them at their word. Furthermore, while I do enjoy NASA and all their hard work a fair bit of their engineers aren't nearly as smart as
they think they are. I don't want to sound like I'm bashing them, but there's a right and a wrong way to do certain things. They don't always go about
it the right way, but that's not to say they haven't done more for the cosmic understanding exercised by the human race than pretty much any other
single party.
As far as ET life in this universe, I could hardly care less at this point personally. I like to remain undecided on the issue of whether or not we
are being visited, but I do have an opinion on likelihoods and criteria in any case. I see a lot of compelling evidence, but have not seen proof.
Their philosophy and history would be interesting, at least for a mirror to our own animate nature. I have a theory that as philosophy and science
advances within a species or sect the less proactive they become. They begin to understand primary necessity as their imperatives become more
succinct, and as their abilities trend toward the limits surpassing forces of nature things which are whimsical or self gratifying in nature become
less alluring. I won't go into justification in detail here since my posts tend to already be more voluble than I would prefer, and I think others
could do their own legwork along avenues I haven't had the time or perspective for. I will say it is something I see in elders of our own species,
they become more metered and measured as time goes on and their needs become less in magnitude while more secure in availability.
I don't expect a species advanced enough to contact us would be especially inclined to do so for noble reasons, and if we found a species similar in
capability to ours I would be very apprehensive simply in regard to their vestigial ignorances- which our species has in excess. I personally find it
ridiculous that we still live on the surface of our planet for instance, knowing the cosmic dangers which are capable of bottlenecking the species
with little to zero notice. We know it's not safe to be fools in the face of the cosmos, and yet we are beating the brakes off the species simply to
inevitably drive into the same pitfalls which ended creatures who came before us. We're even driving other species on this planet to extinction to do
so. I would expect a comparatively advanced species to understand this as well, and they would probably be very hard to find if they wisely chose to
adapt to the inevitable before it were upon them.
Then there is the food chain, we enjoy being at the top here on earth- that is when we're not getting crushed to death by our own furniture or
forgetting our offspring in hot cars. Given the supposed age of the universe relative to how quickly we have advanced it is highly unlikely that
within the cosmos our supremacy is absolute. We could even be cattle for all we do not know. There is very little which would surprise or bother me
both in regard to how grim and how complicated our existence is in truth. We enjoy a philosophical separation from the rest of the animal kingdom, but
it stops there. The thing that is most real to a consciousness with any limits is its own need and desire, on that basis a great deal can be justified
against others. We like to think that an absence of malice means inherent good intention. Yet we don't hate cows, in fact we care for them, but again
we damn well have been eating them since Christ was a carpenter. Our diversification in our diets is supposedly a primary element which enables us to
have such powerful brains, who here would now knowingly invite stupidity for the sake of a lesser inclined species? Furthermore, then declining into
stupidity would we not still comprehend they taste very good and again begin to eat them without the broader understanding as to how it would enable
us otherwise? When it comes to ET I think a great deal of interacting with them will have to be predicated on watching what they do and not what they
say, as humans should be interacted with respectively.
So if NASA wants to talk to the bible thumpers I don't see it as an indication of anything other than man's inability to come to terms with knowledge-
again. Additionally I know many here do not forget the church's historical role in diluting science for the aim of control. It does not bode well from
any angle in my opinion. There are many who would not appreciate their intellectual, philosophical, or construct apple carts being upset. Whatever the
truth is or is not someone is going to cry about it. I am not firmly in either category, so I simply worry how NASA might misuse preconceived notions
to pose new discoveries. If the religions of the world are more correct than false so be it, if not then so be it. I'm sure we could all know
everything every human has ever known and we would still die incomprehensibly ignorant. The discomfort of being bewildered or stretching our minds to
entertain wild notions is actually fulfilling to me, it means there is something new to be understood or prepared for in the event of. Not everyone
shares that opinion, some are very happy to be fools if it means happiness. I'd rather know how things truly are than build my own reality under the
aim of comfort or control. None of this ET business really scares me and without the fear of them the topic seems very small. All we can do is come to
terms with whatever the truth is going to be and hope one day our species makes it out of this universe instead of getting smeared against Earth's
bedrock by a planet killer or self-induced conflict.
I will say that the distant future has no place for the people we are now, due to intellectual mothering such the church practices. Many of the things
which define us as human on this planet will hold us back both collectively and individually in the future, the near future. There is a great deal of
junk we hold onto when it comes to who we think we are and our immutable natures respectively. With further understanding and abilities it will be
necessary to shed these notions and tendencies which we now as such a young species seem to find still enthralling and vital. We can remain the same
to die ignorant and indulgent or we can adapt and learn, those are the only choices I see for advanced civilizations. I'm not saying that
individuality needs to be curtailed. I think it needs to be expanded and expounded, but based on intelligent thought. Personally I have no use for the
church when it comes to science of any kind, but I have little grace in regard to embellishing facts or theory under the concern of audience
reception. I don't think Christ himself could get us all to swallow the pill of inevitable change and cascading uncomfortable truths, and certainly
not self-proclaimed servants of such. It has been how many thousand years since supposed Christ? Not really lighting up the tires on the way to that
Christly finish line, are we? I say whatever it is just rip the band-aid off, coddling the ignorant- whatever they might have faith in, whether
established science or proverb- will do the species at large no further good.
edit on 28-12-2021 by AstroDog because: (no reason
given)