Cut to the chase: It's Depopulation

depopulation decreases the number of 'taxable events' one has in a lifetime and a lot of victims have no resources to 'transfer' to heirs (if any )

depopulation by a mild virus or even a semi-lethal vaxxine does not generate positive wealth streams either...

herding people into drug cartel influence / grooming / sex-slave services seems a better return-on-the-dollar than just depopulation via weaponized germ/DNA/Genes ...or planned Eugenics or Euthanasia on a broad scale


useless eaters get to vote & a pack of smokes or a hot plate of chow will gain their vote...unwashed masses serve a purpose, the streets need filled for a lunatic driver to plow through that crowd of living bags of flesh & blood & create an atrocity we can shake our heads about

... and building 'Shrines' in memory of that massacre

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Could be... or it could be that the 'elites' have realized that the neo - liberal dream of uplifting every 'western' citizen into a middle or higher class status became unsustainable and they are focusing on sustainability instead of constant 'growth'.

There's a golden 'goal' for a nation that has industrious people working in a growth economy, and that's 5% GPD growth per year, within' the last three or so decades that GDP growth has gone rampant off the charts and caused situations like exponentially growing productivity; but wages have been stagnant, and people making ridiculous amounts of wealth for doing nothing and increasing welfare dependency, the sub prime crisis in 2008, and well the speculative markets we see today. The virus just made it all worse.

I think population growth is on these peoples minds, but to just outright cull the population doesn't make much sense. It's better to just slow everything down. Which I then do agree, means more control from government and ruling bodies around the world.

I don't think the virus was intended to kill off large swathes of the population, but I have been leaning it was created in a lab, and as history has shown us, we were due for a pandemic anyways, those elites and such knew it was coming, it was just a matter of time and they were ready.

Also, the Kissinger quote is false... I haven't found anything that backs up what that quote says.

One of the stated goals is to eliminate the useless eaters.


There are going to be a lot of people
who will be surprised
at where they fall
in the usefulness scale.

Many of these currently work in Human Resources.

a reply to: sraven

C. If 10,000,000 accepted $10,000 dollars a year, that $100,000,000,000. TPTB would go broke inside of 5 years
and that's low balling how many would take it.

Much easier to make a cheap disease, then make a cheap non functioning vaccine and make more money off that while the population dies off.

originally posted by: StrangeCottageCheese

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
We could depopulate and make things better for those who are here.

I like your perspective on it, but I still have to see proof of the world being over-populated, instead of subjective opinion.
There seems to be enough space, for all of us.

I say, live and let live.

One merely has to drive through a state like Wyoming or Nebraska. Thousands of empty acres that could house millions. So what's the problem?

Humans tend to congregate and settle in the areas of convenience. Those places are choked with people because it's easier to exist in such places.

Yeah, living out on the plains isn't optimal but it is an option. Hell, most folks think the world is overpopulated simply because their morning commute sucks.

Want to slow reproductive activity? Don't 'feather the nest' so much.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Once again you didn't read my thread. I never said covid was the main weapon of death.

Every time you desperately try to argue my points, I know I'm very close to the truth.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0


I am All For Depopulating Mr. Schwab's Arse for the Good of the Rest of Us . Klaus Cannot Influence World Politics if he Finally Finds himself on the " Other Side " ........

Let the dead bury the dead Jesus said. They will die, Kissinger, Boris Johnson, Bill Gates. Just wait patiently, and you’ll hear about their depopulation from the face of the earth to stand Judgement for their actions and words.

They are liberal scum, cowards, wicked angry people who hate God, and took “science” to a false extreme.

None of these people are scientists but opportunists, who take any misleading form of “data” and twist it to their controlling ends.

That’s what they think “power” is, not true power like creating something, but how many people they control and follow them.

Vanity, delusions and narcissism are their overwhelming trait, fruits of the very worst deadly sin, pride.

They have nothing on God, for his plan dwarfs theirs.

I put forth a similar scenario back in September...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here's the part where it meshes with this thread:

Once that is done, you only have the hard core refusers. These people might need to be arrested and put into unvaccinated camps to "keep the rest of us safe". There they will be vaccinated against their will, but still kept in the camps because they are the known troublemakers, better to keep an eye on them.

So now that we have "100%" vaccination and things start returning to "the new normal" the other half of the plan comes out. You see, in this "what if" dystopian sci-fi show, the Covid vaccine was only the first part of a binary agent. In and of itself, the "vaccine" was mostly harmless, but when introduced to the second part of the binary agent, starts to kill off the population.

Only TPTB, the "power brokers", the "elite" didn't get the "vaccine". They are safe from the second part of the binary agent, but the poor serfs who got the vaccine, are not. The second part of the agent would probably be an airborne release, to prevent anyone from hiding/escaping from the second part. It could be freely released into the atmosphere as it is mostly harmless without the first part of the binary agent to act with.

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: StrangeCottageCheese

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
We could depopulate and make things better for those who are here.

I like your perspective on it, but I still have to see proof of the world being over-populated, instead of subjective opinion.
There seems to be enough space, for all of us.

I say, live and let live.

One merely has to drive through a state like Wyoming or Nebraska. Thousands of empty acres that could house millions. So what's the problem?

Humans tend to congregate and settle in the areas of convenience. Those places are choked with people because it's easier to exist in such places.

Yeah, living out on the plains isn't optimal but it is an option. Hell, most folks think the world is overpopulated simply because their morning commute sucks.

Want to slow reproductive activity? Don't 'feather the nest' so much.

The world is becoming overpopulated because of the resources required, not because there is not enough space. I think decreasing the world population in a logical and humane way would solve a lot of the issues we are facing such as pollution, availability of resources, housing, etc.

a reply to: jtrenthacker

Wrong . The Present State of this Earth can Support 9 Billion if the " Hidden Technologies " of the Elite were Released to the General Public . Let their Lies Continue for the Ignorant Masses out there but Some of Us Know Otherwise........

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

What exactly is the “hidden technologies” and where is the evidence that they exist and/or are being withheld?

a reply to: Zanti Misfit
We are almost at 8B now and it went from 7B to that in the last decade.

Even if the "hidden techs" were released we would be at the max capacity you claimed in the early 2030's.

Seems to me that if what you say is right, now would probably be a good time to address the issue.

a reply to: jtrenthacker

That's for Me to Know , and You to Find Out...........

originally posted by: jtrenthacker

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: StrangeCottageCheese

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
We could depopulate and make things better for those who are here.

I like your perspective on it, but I still have to see proof of the world being over-populated, instead of subjective opinion.
There seems to be enough space, for all of us.

I say, live and let live.

One merely has to drive through a state like Wyoming or Nebraska. Thousands of empty acres that could house millions. So what's the problem?

Humans tend to congregate and settle in the areas of convenience. Those places are choked with people because it's easier to exist in such places.

Yeah, living out on the plains isn't optimal but it is an option. Hell, most folks think the world is overpopulated simply because their morning commute sucks.

Want to slow reproductive activity? Don't 'feather the nest' so much.

The world is becoming overpopulated because of the resources required, not because there is not enough space. I think decreasing the world population in a logical and humane way would solve a lot of the issues we are facing such as pollution, availability of resources, housing, etc.

I'm half and half on your response because of one simple fact: grow a freaking garden. The reason resources are allegedly scarce is because people rely on outside sources verses creating their own.

Which brings me back to my point about convenience...

There are so many easier ways to kill off the population than go through all this fu**ery. I don’t think the goal is to put in a technocratic future right now. That is eventually the goal, but not the immediate. There is an immediate goal that will be implemented first that both people on this board and people that comment on the NYT would get behind. Those that don’t fall for it get a cookie.

a reply to: AcrobaticDreams

Why are the vaccines so lethal and have bad batches that are thousands of times more deadly than other batches?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Its all rather sssllooowwww though isnt it


although I have always claimed ALL those in charge regardless of political affiliation are useless idiots I guess this confirms it, as there plan has barely made a dent, fecking idiots

also a frog will not just sit there despite what people believe

Boiling frog

The boiled-frog myth

THE LEGEND OF THE BOILING FROG IS JUST A LEGEND

when do the vaccinated start dying, I have read on here from 2 prominent posters that 2022 it begins, are you of the same belief?

posted on sept 7th 2021 by a musicically minded poster

Its becoming clear we are all fkd that have taken any of these vaccines . I would say in 9 months, we'll probably see some harmful behavior among the masses worldwide. Sadly , I know someone personally who has both jabs of Pfizer gene therapy jab

so essentially june 2022, only 6 months to go

originally posted by: Granitebones
Better to do it this way, than allowing the indescribable and unprecedented human suffering that would stem from inaction.

WHAT ????

You support genocide ?

Based on FALSE Malthusian garbage ideology ?
Quite aside formthe fact that the West, where the "vaccine" is extensively used is already on a downward population curve and the Third World IS overpopulated and increasing but very little "vaccine" use...

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

If it was depopulation then the person who came up with the idea has probably already been shot for incompetence.

I virus that kills less than 1.6% of the people that it infects, and which has a vaccine in less than a year. That's pathetic.

It would be much easier and simpler for whoever you think id behind this just to open up abortion clinics and to hand out condoms.

Covid has killed about 800,000 people in 18 months at a HUGE cost to the economy and to people's own personal wealth.

In contrast there are about 700,000 - 800,000 abortions in the US each year. At a cost of ... say ... $500 per person. Or much lower if they take plan B. Clearly abortions are the more cost effective method of population control, they're cheaper and more effective. The total number of abortions could easily be pushed to 1.5 million per year simply by relaxing restrictions in conservative states. And I'm sure that any group that could justify unleashing a killer virus on the world would have absolutely no qualms about killing babies. By reducing the cost, they could probably increase the number of abortions to well over 2 million.

Now add sex education and condom distribution to that, and promoting "alternative" gender identities on social media so there were fewer penis being put into vagina to make babies, and you could further reduce the number of births. Maybe 5 million when combined with free abortions on demand.

Covid is a terrible method of population control by comparison.

No. They will have been rewarded for an excellent job. The virus was just lethal enough to cause the fear, along with the compliant media. The real package was the vaccine.

I mean they don’t want 2 billion dead immediately. That would cost them and throw the world in to chaos. However, if fertility drops to almost zero, the vaxxed are offered enhancements and inducements, the chaos will be put off long enough to bring in humanities replacement. It will be a slow burn, but burn it will, if we let it.