Cut to the chase: It's Depopulation

It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.

-Mark Twain




Klaus Schwab unintentionally doing his best Dr. Evil impersonation


They've been dropping hints for decades and even discussing it publicly. The elites know that they can openly advertise their agenda's and people still won't figure it out.



The initial plan can be defined by 3 steps:

1. Release a gain of function virus that kills a small percentage of the global population. Artificially inflate the death count to instill fear.

2. Use this fear to push a novel mRNA drug, and call it a “vaccine.” The vaccine kills many more than the virus, and causes sterility and miscarriages, as well as immediate deaths if you have a bad batch. The vaccine is then used as a psychological tool to divide the public and this division allows for step three.

3. Using both the fear from the virus and division over the vaccine, laws are passed to take away fundamental rights and liberties. Authoritarianism takes hold, contributing to many more deaths, beginning with quarantine camps for the unvaccinated or those who don't keep up with their booster regime. This along with ongoing vaccine “boosters” would allow for the real depopulation to occur, like we've seen countless times throughout history with other mass genocides.

Australia and Canada are already on step 3. Why are countries building massive quarantine camps instead of using the money and resources to increase hospital capacities, assuming the mainstream narrative of “hospitals are being overrun with the sick” is true?



The World Economic Forum has admitted it's currently implementing the great reset based on public documents that were disclosed on social media:



The great reset has a technocratic and transhumanism agenda, but the implementation of those goals are a bit further down the road, closer to the 2030 finish line. The first goal is the thinning of the herd. In preparation, The WEF quietly became partners with the UN in 2019.

Source


Another key player who has eluded to the depopulation goal, albeit with a meager reduction of 15% is Bill Gates, in his famous and now youtube censored Ted Talk:

www.bitchute.com...

The UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, discusses this issue as well in his own telegraph article from 2007:



In 2009 Henry Kissinger addressed the WHO council on eugenics, and very specifically mentioned this goal:



Another example from 1981, in a book written by Jacques Attalli demonstrates the mindset of the elite:



Perhaps one of the most well known examples of this is the Georgia Guidestones:



Since civilization is on the verge of collapse, it is ideal to create and control the collapse rather than waiting for it to happen. While some mention that depopulation isn't occurring, just wait. The sterility of many is going to have a massive impact future on future growth, as well as an explosion of health conditions like cancers in the coming years. This will take a bit of time to "kick in" much like boiling a frog slowly, but eventually the water becomes too hot, and by then it's too late.

Better to do it this way, than allowing the indescribable and unprecedented human suffering that would stem from inaction.

Wanna depopulate. Simply offer every single adult $10,000 a year, every year, not to have children.

That'd be a great start.

Why use a virus? Why does depopulation have to be nefarious? We could depopulate and make things better for those who are here. But why must depopulate mean murdering people.

Or does EVERYTHING have to be "those evil elites" trying to control the world.

i guess the moral of the story is "don't be a useless eater"

originally posted by: Granitebones
Better to do it this way, than allowing the indescribable and unprecedented human suffering that would stem from inaction.

Well, at least we are admitting it was likely an experiment...admitting the problem is always the first step.

You only use "yours sincerely" if you have used a name in the opening "Dear". Otherwise it is "yours faithfully" and never "warmest regards".

So these people are morons.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
Wanna depopulate. Simply offer every single adult $10,000 a year, every year, not to have children.

That'd be a great start.

Why use a virus? Why does depopulation have to be nefarious? We could depopulate and make things better for those who are here. By why must depopulate mean murdering people.

Or does EVERYTHING have to be "those evil elites" trying to control the world.

a. every single adult can't have children - only the women can.
b. they tried it in China - didn't work

originally posted by: Granitebones
Better to do it this way, than allowing the indescribable and unprecedented human suffering that would stem from inaction.

I think the people calling for a population reduction need to be the first to go. For the greater good of coarse.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
We could depopulate and make things better for those who are here.

I like your perspective on it, but I still have to see proof of the world being over-populated, instead of subjective opinion.
There seems to be enough space, for all of us.

I say, live and let live.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
Wanna depopulate. Simply offer every single adult $10,000 a year, every year, not to have children.

That'd be a great start.

Why use a virus? Why does depopulation have to be nefarious? We could depopulate and make things better for those who are here. But why must depopulate mean murdering people.

Or does EVERYTHING have to be "those evil elites" trying to control the world.

Maybe you should talk to Kissinger? You could commiserate on ways to go about it?

Seems he and you think about this stuff in the same way.

Also: of note is now the first ones to respond here on ATS seem to be in soft agreement with all of this.

Sigh. How far we have all fallen.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I have been using my what have to figure this one out and, dude. This is a fake.

originally posted by: Granitebones
Better to do it this way, than allowing the indescribable and unprecedented human suffering that would stem from inaction.

I would prefer not doing this it all.

They have been conditioning their views upon the population for 100 years at least, those being that there is just something wrong with mankind.

They have done their best to bring out the worst of mankind, yet our true nature shines throw their extraordinary amount of corruption.

We simply need to remove the Eugenic Satanic Pedo families from their positions of power and influence and the suffering that is already occurring will begin to right itself.

There is zero justification of what they are doing.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Since civilization is on the verge of collapse, it is ideal to create and control the collapse rather than waiting for it to happen. While some mention that depopulation isn't occurring, just wait. The sterility of many is going to have a massive impact future on future growth, as well as an explosion of health conditions like cancers in the coming years. This will take a bit of time to "kick in" much like boiling a frog slowly, but eventually the water becomes too hot, and by then it's too late.

You have put together an excellent thread!!

S&F

They have made it painfully obvious what their plans and intentions are. And yet people still claim conspiracy theory and march along with the agenda. I'd like to add Rockefeller Foundations Operation Lockstep, strange to see it come to fruition no?

2010-rockefellers-operation-lockstep-predicted-202 0-lockdown/

The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing.

There is no record of Henry Kissinger ever giving such a speech. Kissinger is one of the worlds' most evil people, IMO, and I wouldn't put it past him to be involved in such plans, but there is zero credible evidence he ever spoke publicly on the topic.

I wouldn't doubt for a minute that he's one of the top players in the path the world is on these days, but he mostly left the public scene decades ago. Being a proponent of OWO his entire life, it stands to reason he's also for the depopulation agenda, but has been careful not to speak publicly on the issue.

When he retired/disappeared from public he became the Wizard of Oz in my mind.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

If it was depopulation then the person who came up with the idea has probably already been shot for incompetence.

I virus that kills less than 1.6% of the people that it infects, and which has a vaccine in less than a year. That's pathetic.

It would be much easier and simpler for whoever you think id behind this just to open up abortion clinics and to hand out condoms.

Covid has killed about 800,000 people in 18 months at a HUGE cost to the economy and to people's own personal wealth.

In contrast there are about 700,000 - 800,000 abortions in the US each year. At a cost of ... say ... $500 per person. Or much lower if they take plan B. Clearly abortions are the more cost effective method of population control, they're cheaper and more effective. The total number of abortions could easily be pushed to 1.5 million per year simply by relaxing restrictions in conservative states. And I'm sure that any group that could justify unleashing a killer virus on the world would have absolutely no qualms about killing babies. By reducing the cost, they could probably increase the number of abortions to well over 2 million.

Now add sex education and condom distribution to that, and promoting "alternative" gender identities on social media so there were fewer penis being put into vagina to make babies, and you could further reduce the number of births. Maybe 5 million when combined with free abortions on demand.

Covid is a terrible method of population control by comparison.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Since civilization is on the verge of collapse, it is ideal to create and control the collapse rather than waiting for it to happen. 

I'd be in disagreement with above statement; letting those who intentionally fumbled the ball to begin with to pick up the ball again and continue to run with it will again be the function of a collapsed civilization for any future generation that might get a chance at life. Textbook being set up for failure. 🤔

Removing untrustworthy elements from authoritative positions would be more compassionate in the long run, for the greater good.
🙏❤

Sorry but it just makes no sence they would kill the sheep and leave the resistance

Not caring about the risk for profit is pharmaceutical company's thing just look at any drug add the side-effects are worse than what they cure from there a bunch of millionairs buy stock in the company and scare/force people into taking the drug everyone profits except us

We are one disaster away from not only going completely extinct but actually destroying every living thing on the planet .

if the population drops to low there's no one to man the nuclear power plants etc..

So a Virus -Asteroid-Super Volcano or our own stupidity can and will destroy our entire planet at some point .

As of April 2020, there are 440 operable power reactors in the world, with a combined electrical capacity of 390 GW. Additionally, there are 55 reactors under construction and 109 reactors planned, with a combined capacity of 63 GW and 118 GW, respectively, while 329 more reactors are proposed.

Before Nuclear Power we could repopulate if we dropped down to a few thousand .

Sure it is

We don't need no stinkin elites to depopulate the earth. We are perfectly capable of doing it ourselves.