Pentagon Orders Company To Cease Making Christian Dog Tags - Anti-Religion Push Escalates

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Attacked the church with multiple child abuse claims? Are you seriously defending pedophiles? SCREW THE CHURCH. If you go around touching kids your face should be plastered all over the media. They are getting what they deserve.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: M5xaz
You fully approve of mess with your uniform with a Sikh religious symbol.

Maybe you missed it but the Army approved it, unlike that poor Christian guy who just felt he could unilaterally change his dog tags. I guess he felt he was very, very special and the rules didn't apply.

Not looking for "special rules"
Just looking to maintain what military rules the US has had for 200 years +
The "special rules" you speak of are the new 2021 Biden anti-Christian ones

Maybe you missed it but Christian symbols and even specific christian chaplain military uniform have been part of the US military since the American Revolutionary war, over 200 years.


This has continued through ww2


And up to at least very very recently, complete with military-issued religious scarfs and insignias prominently diplaying the Christian Cross you so hate:




You falsely claim to merely want to ban religious symbols but then state you are OK with Sikh ones.


You want and support Biden's destruction of the historic Christianity in the American military and likely the US as a whole
You are simply lying and are an anti-Christian bigot.

At least, stop being such a coward and proclaim your anti-Christian bigotry loud and clear.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus


Understood by who? Other Christians capitalize Church also, and punctuation does not justify a diversion from the topic, which isnt pedophiles in church. Those come in all religious stripes. You are trying to hijack the thread. Create a new post if you want to rehash that topic.

originally posted by: M5xaz
Not looking for "special rules"

Sure you are. You want the sad vic to be able to break the rules.

Maybe you missed it but Christian symbols and even specific christian chaplain military uniform have been part of the US military since the American Revolutionary war, over 200 years.

The funny thing is this proves my point, that's the official uniform as in 'regulation', thanks for confirming.

You want and support Biden's destruction of the historic Christianity...

LOL, 'the historic Christianity'. They crusaders or the US Army? They carry the flag of the United State of America, not the flag of the Holy See or some other dopey religious flag.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
Understood by who?

By people who understood the Original Post. Was there another religious organization shuffling perverts around that got exposed by the media much to the disappointment of the Original Poster?

As for it being off topic, it's right there in the Original Post, try reading it again.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Trademark violation then? I thought the company was printing Bible verses on them. Did DoD trademark those like the DoJ trademarked the biker gang, Mongols, logo? lol

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

The topic isnt pedophile priests, even tho the OP regrettably gave you an opportunity to attack him by cherry picking a single sentence in the entire lengthy post. You fall on it like a hungry widemouth bass on a rubber worm. Because thats what you do.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
Trademark violation then? I thought the company was printing Bible verses on them. Did DoD trademark those like the DoJ trademarked the biker gang, Mongols, logo? lol

I already answered this, it's the DoD marks they are using without authorization.

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
The topic isnt pedophile priests...

No, it's another 'woe is me, my religion is under attack' threads and that was one of the more egregious examples given. I could have refuted all six of them but I figured it's redundant.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Im sure there are plenty of public domain ‘marks’. Are you certain he has printed copyrighted images? In between Bible verses and religious icons and PII? Damn, thats alot of real estate on a little ol tag…..

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
Are you certain he has printed copyrighted images?

Yes, it's in the Original Post.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

A talking head on faux claimed it. The images in the vid dont look like they would be trademarked. Im calling BS until I see one.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Very little to do with Catholicism in as much as an identifier that would communicate the faith of the soldier and how to handle their remains. The pope can take a hike but thats not the issue here.

I think you knew that but are being obtuse to troll as always.

Any other exceptions to this for other religions?

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
A talking head on faux claimed it.

Based on the filing in the lawsuit which is public record.

originally posted by: Butterfinger
Any other exceptions to this for other religions?

Ask the Pentagon.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: M5xaz
Not looking for "special rules"

Sure you are. You want the sad vic to be able to break the rules.

No.

I want the same rules the US military has had for the past 200 years + to be maintained, as opposed to new screwed up bigoted Biden rules


But you support bigoted
Sikh OK
Christian not OK

And this despite US history....read a book sometime, your ignorance is showing....

originally posted by: M5xaz
I want the same rules the US military has had for the past 200 years + to be maintained...

The alleged vic is the one who broke the rules that have been in existence about uniform regulations. All he had to do is follow the rules and no one would have said anything, but he felt special.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
"the corporate media attacked the Church with multiple child abuse claims (not saying those claims didn't need reporting but what was the media's true intention?"

Really? I could care less what the intentions of someone are who is "outing" a pedophile. Let's start there.

Second, there are other religions. You would have to include Islam, Judaism, and throw in the Church of Satan too.

There is a reason we separate Church and State. And those of us who want to keep it that way are NOT anti-religion. We are anti "just YOUR religion over all others". The State should not promote any religion.

Incidentally I don't have any problem with these dog tags or nativity scenes, or Christmas displays. But if the Church of Satan wants to put something up also, I don't have a problem with that either. Or Islam, or a Manora. Why, freedom of religion. That freedom applies to all, not just Christians. And that freedom includes FREEDOM FROM RELIGION ALSO.

Whatever the Media’s motivation was to out the sicko pedos in the Catholic Church was it wasn’t about protecting the victims.

Otherwise this would be happening to many other institutions.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Government-controlled religion. Government-controlled everything in China. If you truly believe there should be a separation between Church and State then you should be against the State controlling Church. The serration all ready existed. The State is now overreaching its power in an enormous way.

a reply to: grey580

I can't argue with emotional protestors, so say whatever nonsense spews out.