Nazi Eugenics Rebranded As 'Bioethics'.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

We also have a severe change in language, "What to do with all the people who haven't been vaccinated?" It seems the Governments are under some pressure to get a totalitarian change in before spring, the legal challenges must be freaking them out, which means their only way out is total control. www.bitchute.com...

Supreme court approved his model.🤯💣


twitter.com...

The clip 👆 is from this docu, A Dangerous Idea: The History of Eugenics in America.

Harry Laughlin and Eugenics - Nazi Connection. The Nazi party based much of its own sterilization laws on Laughlin’s model.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Will watch that documentation today mate.

Thought Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav gave a pretty powerful speech below and also warns of the 'current global threat confronting our civilization'.

Also thought some extremely important points were raised about 'eugenics'.

Speech


"The real viral disease that infected Nazi Germany is Eugenics— Eugenics is the elitist ideology at the root of all genocides.

– Eugenics is cloaked in a mantle of pseudo- science.

– It was embraced by the academic & medical establishment as well as the judiciary — in Germany and the United States.

– Eugenicists justify social & economic inequality.

They legitimize discrimination, apartheid, sterilization, euthanasia, and genocide. The Nazis called it “ethnic cleansing” — for the protection of the gene pool.
Medicine was perverted from its healing mission & was weaponized."

Cheers.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

Many thanks for posting that documentary mate.. and certainly one that every American (and human being) should watch.

•"All politics is applied biology."

Adolf Hitler.

Really filled in some of the blanks for me and no doubt there are some very uncanny similarities as to what's going on today.

Cheers.

this should come at the topic from the right angle that the new liberals ran with this first and the Nazis took their cues from them not the other way around..

in this the likes of Imperial in London played a big part in the founding of eugenics as it did in the covid lockdowns..

there was a rush to see who could sterilise the poor first, the uk liberals tried in 33, 36 and 37 but failed as the nazis passed their laws in 34, the uk tried to do the euthanasia in 36 and pushed that to north America in 38 and it all links into abortions and other hot topics..

what we see with the nazi camps is where liberalism risked ending up.. its why when the camps the sterilisations, the experiments, the mutilations, the exterminations became known as an ideology it was put in the rubbish bin..

20th century support for eugenics by Churchill, Beveridge, Keynes etc – what to make of it?

Churchill was for the bulk of his political career a prominent liberal...

Eugenics went into steep decline after 1945. Most recoiled from it once they saw where it led – to the gates of Auschwitz. The infatuation with an idea horribly close to nazism was steadily forgotten. But we need a reckoning with this shaming past.

originally posted by: nickyw

this should come at the topic from the right angle that the new liberals ran with this first and the Nazis took their cues from them not the other way around..

It does, did you not read the third paragraph, click on any of the links, read any of the posts or even watch the main video?

originally posted by: karl 12


and the antics of the (Rockefeller funded) Kaiser Wilhelm Institute then you'll probably get a good idea.

Thought there was some important info in the video below.


See 5:10


Cheers.

a reply to: karl 12

so when we look at the modern liberalism we don't see nazism we see liberalism and that is because neither Germany, the Rockerfellers or the Nazis where the leading power behind it, new liberalism was, in particular Galton the rich and powerful fell for it then as they do now...

The first international conference was held by imperial in London, it especially worth noting the emergence of the Fabián's through the liberal reforms, in more modern times we see those like the Fabián's and abortionists like Mary stopes all try to clean up their names to remove that part of their past..

How the establishment fell for eugenics

For obvious reasons, we view eugenic ideology through the lens of the Second World War and the Holocaust. Yet there’s another story that must be told — of how eugenics in Britain and America exerted an influence over the intellectual mainstream that outright fascism never did. Eugenic ideas were deeply embedded within almost every facet of modernity — shaping the thinking of movements, organisations and individuals that are still venerated today as icons of science and progress.

Taking Fisher as a starting point, one can, in the manner of a crazed conspiracy theorist, trace the links between many of the biggest names in science, literature, politics and social reform. Except that there’s no conspiracy — it’s all on record: a dense web of professional and personal relations that define the intellectual life of the era.

we can do the same with today liberalism... the similarity to the liberalism of the late 19th and early 20th century is striking.. the same institutions, universities, groups and organisations etc

a reply to: nickyw

Thanks for the reply, am still composing a reply to you regarding this post on the Fabian Society and how the goals of its founding documents are near identical to the goals of 'shareholder capitalism' within 'the great reset'.

Also, if one 'follows the money' then thought the Fabian Society's founding of the 'London School of Economics' and their connections to the Bilderberg/WEF were also noteworthy.

There's turning out to be too much info for one post so will start a new thread on the subject and your input would be most welcome.

originally posted by: nickyw

The first international conference was held by imperial in London..

Yes, considering his father's antics with Sanger's organisation did find it telling that Bill Gates chose to hold the Gates Foundation's London summit on the exact 100th anniversary of that first International Eugenics Conference in London.


Thread

Cheers.

a reply to: karl 12

I just want to follow up with that i'm not suggesting your theories are wrong but that our entire social and welfare structure is founded on and been built by the kind of people who shared the same kinds of views on humanity..

I lived in Newhaven and a short dog walk away is Rodmell where Virgina Woolf put rocks into her pockets before walking into the Ouse to drown herself.. in her diary she wrote...

“we met & had to pass a long line of imbeciles. the first was a very tall young man, just queer enough to look at twice, but no more; the second shuffled, & looked aside; and then one realised that everyone in that long line was a miserable ineffective shuffling idiotic creature, with no forehead, or no chin, & an imbecile grin, or a wild suspicious stare. It was perfectly horrible. They should certainly be killed.”

she wa one of the Bloomsberry set (leading English figures) who came from the leading universities and interlectual groups..

liberal MP Churchill held similar views they should all be sterilised to prevent any inconvenience to others, Keynes thought they should also loose other rights such as voting, these are the people who are still held up as icons when reality is they wanted a future little different to those we revile..

a reply to: karl 12

thanks i'll look forward to the posts as to much of today mirrors the period leading up to the demise of new liberalism and its eugenics movement in the 1930s and then the nazis realising the liberal eugenics ideal outcome.

what I find most striking about Boris Johnson walking away from politics is that like his hero Churchill they knew progressive liberalism is dead..

from that stance its certainly going to be an interesting winter as we enter the crucible..

originally posted by: nickyw

thanks i'll look forward to the posts as to much of today mirrors the period leading up to the demise of new liberalism and its eugenics movement in the 1930s and then the nazis realising the liberal eugenics ideal outcome..

No worries and great link by the way.


How the establishment fell for eugenics


Galton's comments about the 'Chinese replacing Africans' are a bit of an eye-opener as do remember reading this article a while back.

Also, don't know your thoughts on Russell but ever come across the 'Co-Efficients Club'?

The Pilgrim Group and the Milner group also sound rather dodgy.

Cheers.

Canadian Government promoting 'euthanasia' for citizens (including teenagers).

From 25:40