Nazi Eugenics Rebranded As 'Bioethics'.

a reply to: MetalThunder

Some good info there mate and also saw there was this warning about the family from nearly 100 years ago by New York City Mayor John F. Hylan.

Seems they've got their fingers in an awful lot of pies from Bilderberg, WEF and Trilateral Commission right through to the WHO, FDA and CDC - Gut's not wrong about their close relationship with China either.

Also turns out that not only are they the largest financial backers of the eugenics movement but they've also 'funded almost everything in regards climate'

Rockefellers Funded Eugenics Initiative to Sterilize 15 Million Americans

originally posted by: strongfp

Unfortunately back then not many schools and fields of science were publicly funded and the public needed to allow a little wiggle room for the psychopathic minds of the uber rich who legitimately wanted to take over the world and use their money.

Very nicely put Strongfp and yes very unfortunate - some further details below about how medicine was co-opted, hijacked or whatever you want to call it.





Nowadays the Rockefellers (in tandem with Chase) own 'the largest drug manufacturing combine in the world' and probably are part owners of BlackRock but it's impossible to find out.

Cheers.

a reply to: Nothin



Have Protestants ever been short on class? The only danger they have; Is rubbing others noses into it then holding theirs high afterwards.

Such an idiom for those that don't? On the level.

Much of this eugenics philosopy from the elite thinkers and medical mafia establishment goes way back, very deep dark entangled web of deception, gain-of-function and still a number #1 priority among the WEF/Rockefeller/Davos Club elites.

While researching JPL at Caltech I stumbled across The Human Betterment Foundation, of which Caltech’s Robert A. Millikan was a trustee, promoted forced sterilization in California. (Library of Congress)

The Human Betterment Foundation (HBF) was the brainchild of Ezra S. Gosney, who had settled in Pasadena with a fortune from farming and real estate and established the organization in 1929. The group’s membership roll guaranteed it a wide influence.

It included Rufus von KleinSmid, then the president of USC, Lewis Terman, a Stanford psychologist who pioneered the study of IQ, and Harry Chandler, the publisher of the Los Angeles Times.

American eugenicists found common cause with the emerging Nazi regime in Germany. In a 1934 article, Paul Popenoe, a lead researcher for the Human Betterment Foundation, saluted Adolf Hitler and the Nazis for their determination to achieve “national regeneration” by applying “biological principles to human society.”

Popenoe quoted liberally from Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” including his admonition that “to prevent defective persons from producing equally defective offspring, is an act dictated by the clearest light of reason.... the most human act of mankind.”

Caltech faces reckoning over its links to eugenics and sterilization movement

David Starr Jordan (was chancellor of Stanford University), a board trustee for HBF and also a member of the secretive COSMOS Club (posts) (founded by John Wesley Powell in 1868) in D.C. that both Dr. Fauci and Dr. Peter Daszak held meetings along with other biowarfare conspirators.

Human Betterment Foundation & Dr. Clarence Gamble who is the great-uncle of Foster Gamble, heir to the Procter and Gamble fortune, who gave us "Thrive: What on Earth Will It Take?" (2011) (IMDB, Thrive II: This is What it Takes (2020) and The Reality of Truth (2016).

From North Carolina Sterilization Act in 1929:


Maafa 21 - Black Genocide in 21st Century America (2½ hr documentary 2009)

"We have reached a period in the history of the world when ignorance is criminal and deserves the heaviest penalty. Ignorance is not black magic, but it is the greatest ally that the black magician has in the world today."
― Manly P. Hall

More than a hundred years ago, Rudolf Steiner wrote the following:

"In the future, we will eliminate the soul with medicine. Under the pretext of a 'healthy point of view', there will be a vaccine by which the human body will be treated as soon as possible directly at birth, so that the human being cannot develop the thought of the existence of soul and Spirit.

To materialistic doctors, will be entrusted the task of removing the soul of humanity. As today, people are vaccinated against this disease or that disease, so in the future, children will be vaccinated with a substance that can be produced precisely in such a way that people, thanks to this vaccination, will be immune to being subjected to the "madness" of spiritual life. He would be extremely smart, but he would not develop a conscience, and that is the true goal of some materialistic circles.

With such a vaccine, you can easily make the etheric body loose in the physical body. Once the etheric body is detached, the relationship between the universe and the etheric body would become extremely unstable, and man would become an automaton, for the physical body of man must be polished on this Earth by spiritual will. So, the vaccine becomes a kind of ahrimanic force; man can no longer get rid of a given materialistic feeling. He becomes materialistic of constitution and can no longer rise to the spiritual".

― Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925)

Note: from what I could find the above has been translated from German a dozen or so times over the decades and is an English paraphrased translation passed over the interwebs as a meme but cited by people such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr and several esoteric scholars. Prior to 2020 vaccine rage, many would have thought this to be nonsense and/or this doesn't affect me or my kids.

Example sources:
Rudolf Steiner on Traditional Childhood Illnesses and Vaccines [PDF]



REMOVING THE SOUL OF HUMANITY

The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness



Excerpt from the book preface:

THE WORD "eugenics" was coined in 1883 by the English scientist Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton, who pioneered the mathematical treatment of heredity, took the word from a Greek root meaning "good in birth" or "noble in heredity." He intended it to denote the "science" of improving human stock by giving "the more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable.'

This book is one of the most widely recommended and referenced books by those who disagree or agree with the eugenics movement in the United States.

In the Name of Eugenics Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, 1985 by Daniel J. Kevles. PDF at Archive.org. Daniel J. Kevles is an American historian of science best known for his books on American physics and eugenics. He is Stanley Woodward Professor of History, Emeritus at Yale University and J. O. and Juliette Koepfli Professor of the Humanities, Emeritus at CalTech.

As we have seen, Eugenics has been disguised in many forms & medical methods and lately alot of terms/words are being redefined alongside healthcare bills.

a reply to: The GUT

I remember watching an interview with David Rockefeller years ago and he said his best advice for young people was to travel.

I remember thinking at the time "while you still can". I just didn't expect it so soon.

David Rockefeller knew exactly what was going to happen.

a reply to: Nothin

Those quotes are horrific.

These "people" are Demons.

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Maybe those that always warn us about them ' Do-Gooders™ ' were on-to something ?

They really think that Humanity is a ' thing ' to be engineered, and controlled.

Was looking for the vid of the WEF™ Bioethicists™, having somethin like a Brainstorming™- session, where they are giggling, and just overall totally giddy about how they could shape, form, and train Humans to act like well-behaved pets.

Might find it in a couple of weeks, or so... LoL !!

Meanwhile : Here's a vid from Amazing-Polly on Eugenics.

She's neither always right, nor always wrong.
Just a thinker, like us.

a reply to: zosimov

Thanks for actually addressing the content mate - very much appreciated and some further terrible info here about the Rockefellers and John Hopkins which was described as something right out of Dr. Mengele's notebook' .

originally posted by: Nothin


Was looking for the vid of the WEF™ Bioethicists™, having somethin like a Brainstorming™- session, where they are giggling, and just overall totally giddy about how they could shape, form, and train Humans to act like well-behaved pets.

Was it this one dude?

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Yes I did need a drink after reading that.


youtu.be...

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow


More than a hundred years ago, Rudolf Steiner wrote the following


"There will be a vaccine by which the human body will be treated as soon as possible directly at birth, so that the human being cannot develop the thought of the existence of soul and Spirit.

a reply to: karl 12

Yeahish : my memory feels like an amalgam of that vid, and another of the same WEF™ Bioethicist™ 'woman' in the short-sleeves and shortish skirt.
The other memory is from a less formal type of setting.

But from your vid, what she says around 9'30", about using pain as a tool for coercion ?
Yeah : a monster, like Wide-Eyes said.

Anything worse than a cute monster, in a short-skirt ?

Saw one once, in my old hometown : almost capitulated . Really cute temptress.
Then a bud clued-me-in : 3 kids from different dads with no other kids, and good-paying factory jobs ; full child-support from all 3 ; working under the table in a bar ; pulling-in more money monthly than a doctor.

Lot's of songs been written about them types...

Am trying to figure-out how to bring this back on topic... LoL !!

a reply to: karl 12

Great vid clip! Good ole Griffin been lecturing on this battle longer than I been alive. Yes, I noticed that infamous 2001 photo of elites. Chilling summary and the globalist noose is ratcheting tighter. Good analogy at end.

Bioethics of Bio-electronics??

Roswell Biotechnologies teamed with GTRI for the MIST program.

Roswell Biotechnologies Awarded Government Contract for DNA Digital Data Storage

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 17, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Roswell Biotechnologies, Inc., the pioneer in the development of a molecular electronics platform for DNA sequencing, today announced that it is a member of a team led by Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) that has been awarded a US government contract worth up to $25 million to develop a sequencing technology capable of reading data stored in DNA at speeds up to 10 TB per day, or more than 400x times the speed of currently available sequencing technologies. The award comes from the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity's (IARPA) Molecular Information Storage (MIST) program, IARPA which supports the development of new technologies of interest to the agencies of the US Intelligence Community, including the CIA, FBI, NSA, and the Department of State.

Roswell Biotechnologies name was a shout-out to the Roswell UFO in that the technology is so advanced that it seems to be “alien,” according to this San Diego channel 10 news feature.

Supported/funded by IARPA 👇

Scientists claim big advance in using DNA to store data

Microsoft ($MSFT) has ordered 10 million strands of synthetic DNA from Twist Bioscience. The deal gives Microsoft the material to run research into the storage of digital data on DNA, a method that is tipped to enable the long-term housing of information in a relatively small amount of space.

The greater good...

a reply to: Nothin

Yes mate all seems to be about coercion these days and do seem to remember another vid with DARPA's Regina Dugan laughing whilst discussing some truly disturbing things.

Obviously been posted before but also got to love the audacity of the Gates Foundation holding their London summit on the exact 100th anniversary of the first International Eugenics Conference in London.

Some relevant eugenic quotes below and think it's fair to say that some of these people sound mentally ill.

USE OF GAS CHAMBERS

"We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment …

A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people's time to look after them."

Source: George Bernard Shaw, Lecture to the Eugenics Education Society, Reported in The Daily Express, March 4, 1910.

link

• George Bernard Shaw vid (sourced by ETMN).


Video

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

Much of this eugenics philosopy from the elite thinkers and medical mafia establishment goes way back, very deep dark entangled web of deception, gain-of-function and still a number #1 priority among the WEF/Rockefeller/Davos Club elites.

Still going through your links mate, great research and very ominous stuff - also saw this old VHS video which actually mentions the WEF in relation to the future controlled demolition of first world economies.

When it comes to GBS also saw the founding documents of the eugenicist Fabian Society line up rather well with WEF ideologies - especially the part about the extinction of private property.

a reply to: karl 12

Well, this is nothing new, words are being constantly changed to disguise or veil what they really are.

Military and Psychiatry are very good at this. Electric Shock was changed to '(Electro-)Convulsive Therapy'.

Shell Shock became Battle Fatique, then Operational Exhaustion, and finally Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Not sure if this has already been changed into something less stressful.

Everything is also a 'disorder' now, when before, there was more diversity in things like this.

There IS a bit of truth and solid basis for 'eugenics' if you think of it purely from pragmatic-informational and biological perspective. Certain genetics give more tendencies to certain abilities, directions, etc. For example, practicing incest usually leads to children that are not completely healthy or functional.

Certain races (although many even deny the concept of a race somehow) do have predisposition to certain genetic faculties, this is undeniable, but people still deny it. Just to give one example, asian races are generally more intelligent and feminine, and physically shorter than caucasian ones. It's easy to imagine a stereotypical asian soyboy nerd, isn't it? But imagining a black soyboy nerd doesn't happen as easily, now does it?

Caucasian people seem to sit in the middle when it comes to femininity and other qualities like that, while Asian people are distinctly different. I won't go further into this because people are so reactive and their minds are so warped when it comes to 'race' topics, but you can study and research these things yourself.

Of course using eugenics to discriminate, injure, control or force people into things, is obviously taking it too far, and evil and wrong in all possible ways and levels. People are equal regardless of their body type.

There's a lot of confusion about what 'equality' means, however. Some people think it means that women can do anything men can do. That's NOT what it means.

Equality simply means we're equal in WORTH, regardless of our abilities or bodily qualities/attributes/faculties/shapes/colors/etc.

Equality is paramount, because there's no ethical or logical reason to elevate someone in worth based on their physical body, which is temporary. We are eternal beings, anyone can be in any kind of body, and when that body eventually dies, they can be incarnated into a completely different body.

Some ultra-masculine, huge thug can be born into an ultra-feminine, tiny, petite body next time. So the body is not what they are, and thus people should not be judged by their body.

This is a weird world, as there is a solid basis for so many things, even the insane feminist claims and the 'trans'-phenomenon.

Someone that has lived in a female body last 5 incarnations, is going to feel uncomfortable in a male body, because it's strange and new and not what they are used to. But starting to mutilate your body to force it to align with your discomfort about it, is not going to help anyone. It's best to accept whatever body you have and live with it - you will get a different body eventually.

When feminists claim that gender is a social construction, it's of course a stupid, mad claim, but it does have a solid basis in truth. The basis, of course being, that a physical, temporary body should NOT dictate what you are and what you feel on the inside. People should NOT judge or force certain opinions or values to you based on your physical body.

Why can women not be transvestites, but men can? This is madness, everyone should be able to drape their temporary body with any kind of cloth, regardless of material, color, shape, etc. and not lessen their value as a human being or even a 'man' or 'woman' (no one is FULLY man or woman, because first and foremost, we are souls, we're genderless energy that just temporarily lives in a female or male body). Women can wear pants without being called transvestites, but men can't wear a dress (although historically, men have, look at old asian cultures, the samurai, the scottish people, and so on)?

All human beings have both masculine and feminine sides and characteristics to them, and everyone should express either one or both in any way or amount they feel comfortable. Women can, of course, but men can't. Same soul in a different body, and the world treats you 100% differently. This is almost worse than eugenics, but no one talks about it much.

A human being should be able to choose what they like, what they wear, what they use, etc. based solely on what they want or feel like. A man can't like the color pink, but a woman can? What kind of insane discrimination is that?

A human being should be able to like anything they damn well please. A human being should be able to express their feminity, masculinity, or just humanity as much as they want regardless of their physical body. The body shouldn't dictate anything beyond purely physical things.

This is the core truth about human beings, we are internally what we are, regardless of what kind of body we happen to reside in temporarily. This is what it stems from; 'gender is a social construction'. It's actually partially true, but of course it's not 100% true, as physical differences between genders do exist, and are enormous and vast and have far-reaching consequences.

Even the psychology of men and women is vastly different, their instinctual behaviour is different. Their sexuality is different, their worldview, outlook, and how they operate in the world, etc. is all very different. Men are good at using brute, physical force and commandeering 'charisma' to handle situations and manipulate others and the world around them.

Women use more subtle, but even more powerful ways of female seduction, charm, social manipulation, gossiping and emotional communication. Women are very good and clever about this, which has lead comedians like Bill Burr to be baffled about why he loses every 'battle' with his woman. Women are basically genetically built for social operations on a level men don't dare dream of.

But we are still fundamentally souls first, men and women second, as the soul is eternal, and the body is temporary.

a reply to: The GUT

Their job is to beat the hell out of anything actually ethical.

Well, 'ethics' is a neutral term, you can have good ethics or bad ethics. Ethically bad is still ethical, just not in a good way.

originally posted by: Shoujikina

Well, this is nothing new, words are being constantly changed to disguise or veil what they really are.

Yes would say it's a bit different (and a lot more serious) when the same ideologies responsible for things like the Aktion T4 programare are deliberately masquerading their intentions - especially when it comes to genocide.

Also don't think it's coincedental that the same family who funded the first wave of American eugenics and who then funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (not to mention the SS) are nowadays also funding 'the Hastings Center' (do you?)

"They had to pursue a strategy … called “crypto-eugenics.” In essence, “You seek to fulfill the aims of eugenics without disclosing what you are really aiming at and without mentioning the word.” This is how the Eugenics Society conceived of its funding for the IPPF"

Matthew Connelly, Fatal Misconception

Quote:

"I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."

Adolf Hitler

Don't know if you watched the main video but there's another one here charting the history of the pseudoscience of eugenics - it also discusses the eradication of the dysgenic 'germ plasm' by eliminating anyone deemed 'unfit'.

originally posted by: Shoujikina

For example, practicing incest usually leads to children that are not completely healthy or functional.

Bit ironic there as many of the families who originally promoted this ideology practised exactly that.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

Those quotes are horrific.

These "people" are Demons.

Don't know about demons mate but definitely 'monsters' and it really does seem like some sort of cartoon horror show.

Have been reading more from the links about how Ezekiel Emanuel (Chair of the WEF Future of Health Care Committee) and his fellow eugenicists have proposed that the Hippocratic Oath should become 'obsolete' and that 'people should 'choose to die at the age of 75'.

Whether it's Bill Gates discussing 'death panels' or Bill Gates Senior's Planned Parenthood Federation founder Joseph Fletcher promoting 'killing babies with Down's syndrome or other kinds of idiots' then yes it's all pretty inhuman, inhumane and horrific.

Just when you think it can't get any worse then you see John Hopkins hosting bioethicist Norman Fost's query about 'whether it's important that organ donors be dead?' and bioethicist Peter Singer's argument in favor of 'infanticide' stating that 'there is no relevant difference between abortion and the killing of severely disabled infants'.

"A newborn baby is not an autonomous being, capable of making choices, and so to kill a newborn baby cannot violate the principle of respect for autonomy."

Bioethicist Peter Singer

You've also got insane bioethicists Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva actually promoting infanticide via 'after-birth abortion' arguing that 'the moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus'.

As it states in the main video rarely are these people trained doctors, researchers or medical workers (more like Rockefeller shill quackademics) and their 'anti-human' eugenics cult ideology can be traced directly back to many of the horrors of WWII.

Would say the average person would be genuinely horrified and humanity does need protecting from these people.. and the Hasting Centre should be seen for exactly what it is.

"You think perhaps the backing of powerful men, financiers, will shield you from accountability, but you are now in the spotlight.

Disband this council and reverse the whole course of this nazi revival now".

 Anton Chaitkin 

Cheers.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Some fascinating info in that post mate and had no idea about Rufus von KleinSmid's IQ studies, the HBF or their enthusiastic support of Nazis (or 'Mein Kampf').

It's a repost but there's also some relevant info below on 'forced American sterilization factories' and Nazi eugenic IQ questions.

Always seem to keep coming back to the quote found at 4:30 and did do some reading on Daniel Callahan's involvement in the 'Ford-Rockefeller Program in Population Policy' - also turns out he belonged to Bill Gates Senior's Planned Parenthood Federation and was even on its Margaret Sanger Award Committee.

Perhaps the only thing more mindboggling than all these many Nazi connections is why nobody seems to want to address them.

originally posted by: karl 12


Truly disturbing stuff and if you can stomach researching histories of things like the Nazi Aktion T4 program..

Relevant thread from Lux666:


1939–1945: Medicalized Mass Murder, Children first

originally posted by: karl 12
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Perhaps the only thing more mindboggling than all these many Nazi connections is why nobody seems to want to address them.

I can think of few reasons...

1) the public schools/institutions no longer teach such history
2) Most people remain in denial of any such thing could ever happen again
3) Too many distractions & psychological propaganda
4) The younger generations do not read books (very few do)
5) Ministry of truth censorship
6) Globalist revolution is busy changing culture & Geopolitical landscape; the past is irrevelant citizen!

NWO rebranded as Global Governance Project

What's being transformed?
1. Legal systems
2. Economic systems
3. Political systems
4. Technology (AI surveillance & behavior modification)
5. Healthcare / military medicine / gene therapy
6. Media
7. Access to data
8. Society/culture
9. You
10. Everything else
All via totalitarian movement.

We’ve had...

✅ Constructive Ambiguity
✅ Perception Management
✅ Operant Conditioning
✅ Overton Window Kaleidoscope
✅ Dunbar’s Inundation theory
✅ MK Kultur
✅ Weaponized Hyperstitions
✅ Milgram Obedience
✅ Solomon Asch Conformity
✅ Zimbardo’s ONR...👇


On Resisting Social Influence, 1979, Zimbardo, Office of Naval Research, MKULTRA, Stanford.

The thesis of the essay is that mind control exists not in exotic gimmicks, but rather in the most mundane aspects of experience. The paper presents resistance strategies to unwanted coercive control.

While many people are busy fighting with each other over nonsense due to the constant stream of psychological propaganda and many others confused, trying to figure out what is going on...this ensures the vast majority of the population stays out of their way while the globalist elites install the new technocratic system. Assuming all goes according to their plan, by 2030 we will all be in an unrecognizable brave new world. I really hope I'm wrong.

That said, the globalists are all banking on technology to fulfill their new dystopian system of control, which I think will ultimately fail in the end. IDK, next month, next year my thinking on that could change. I think in the coming years technology itself will run forward, ahead of what they can control leading to some sort of collapse, freedom, something in between, nobody knows yet.

Off to re-watch season 7 of The X-Files.

Just some causal eugenics from William F. Buckley Jr., Skull & Bones, Bilderberg, CIA, Knights of Malta member...


NY Times