It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Fenix F 308
SH Vs Mig 29 -letest modifikatin have a similar chance to winn.
Hockey guy you not Russia stop F. the brain.
this is joke topic .
[edit on 30-3-2005 by Fenix F 308]
Originally posted by Kyle325is
Originally posted by zakattack
this has probably been asked before but what requirements do you have to have to be a US fighter pilot, i mean can you go to any recruiting center and say i want to be a F-15 fighter pilot, then go through there extremely tough course and if you are lucky enough to pass be able to fly a fighter jet
LOL...um, no, you CANNOT do that...go to some of the Air Force websites, read up...
As for "the USAF can't be the best, look who they've fought" argument, who else trains and spends as much resources training as rigorously as the USAF???
Who exactly is proven, in any way, to have better trained, more skilled pilots?
Originally posted by JamesBlonde
The IAF have relevant combat experience against a comparable and welequipped foe. The las t I heard the IAF was able to make a 20:1 mess of the USAF in excercies.
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
Originally posted by Fenix F 308
SH Vs Mig 29 -letest modifikatin have a similar chance to winn.
Hockey guy you not Russia stop F. the brain.
this is joke topic .
[edit on 30-3-2005 by Fenix F 308]
I'm sorry I don't speak duboktish.
And I moved to the US almost eight years ago.
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
Not me...And I'm sure many ppl (non-russian) agree with me on this..
USAF is by far the most logistically deployable but not the best..at lest not proven to be better than its rumored fighter equivalents..
Then who has the best airforce oh wise one?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I think the F/A-22 would be able to know that that he has 2 jets approaching him before the Russian jets can even know where the F/A-22 is thanks to its stealth features and its radar range. I think the F/A-22 could have fired on both of them way before they even know where it ism or before they can get into rage to see him on radar.
[edit on 31-3-2005 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I think the F/A-22 would be able to know that that he has 2 jets approaching him before the Russian jets can even know where the F/A-22 is thanks to its stealth features and its radar range. I think the F/A-22 could have fired on both of them way before they even know where it ism or before they can get into rage to see him on radar.
[edit on 31-3-2005 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I think the F/A-22 would be able to know that that he has 2 jets approaching him before the Russian jets can even know where the F/A-22 is thanks to its stealth features and its radar range. I think the F/A-22 could have fired on both of them way before they even know where it ism or before they can get into rage to see him on radar.
[edit on 31-3-2005 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Ok... Mods can we do something about this person language and ranting. I would prefer that people put a little more though it their posts instead of responding like 2 year olds. Thank You.
Depends on what you define as best....
My definition is that which is capable of matching fighter for fighter, pilot for pilot..