It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: andy06shake
Then again the fellow in the first book is hardly synonymous with the second.
The God of the Old Testament is a vile scumbag.
originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: chr0naut
I would think that people who re-interpret the exact words are in danger:
I have to agree here. How can even a prophet begin to visualize, much less try to detail what the mark could look like in this time and technology?
If the prophecy did not pertain to any time recent to when the book was written, how could the writer describe the mark? They did specify its location.
originally posted by: CharlesT
This bishop mentions your cult, in not so favorable light, in this video.
I see questions seem to ruffle your feathers also.
originally posted by: St Udio
a reply to: CharlesT
you are brave to publish as you did... may you weather the guaranteed storm of ridicule and scorn
getting a jab by deceit or trickery does not necessarily condemn you to the group who willingly accept the 'mark' of those who swear allegiance to the Beast System
after all, sometime in the next several years, but after the Beast-Man-of-perdition is 'revealed'...the 2 witnesses and the 144,000 will all be 'sealed' from the 'gene-mutation' serum that many of us were conned into accepting...
----------> but by then the 'trans-human program of altering the human genome' will be much further along than a mere 'vaxx' against COVID/cv & other gene manipulation viruses
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: chr0naut
I would think that people who re-interpret the exact words are in danger:
I have to agree here. How can even a prophet begin to visualize, much less try to detail what the mark could look like in this time and technology?
If the prophecy did not pertain to any time recent to when the book was written, how could the writer describe the mark? They did specify its location.
Well, firstly, the vaccine leaves no mark in most people, so there's that bit of incongruity.
Then there is the specific location of the mark on the body, in the forehead (μέτωπον - metópon) and in the right hand (δεξιός - dexios). Clearly the vaccines are not injected there.
It also says that 'the mark' is the name of the Beast, or the number of his name. There are multiple vaccines, they all have different names, and none of them are a name, or number, associated with any specific person.
The passage also reveals that the number (ἀριθμός - arithmos) of the Beast is a number of a man, and is six hundred sixty-six (χξϛ - chxs). How does that relate to any of the COVID-19 vaccines?