It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: MykeNukem
One DOES NOT get vaccinated against rabies .
Your point is moot .
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: Jamie2018
Please, wait your turn. The discussion is not about covid vaccination or terrorism, It is about free will and how we handle one's own decision to be or not to be vaccinated, which equals to the decision of infect or not infect others.
We could ask your nanna, but she's dead.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: Jamie2018
The discussion is not about covid vaccination or terrorism, It is about free will and how we handle one's own decision to be or not to be vaccinated, which equals to the decision of infect or not infect others.
We could ask your nanna, but she's dead.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: generik
I see. Then the debate is about whether vaccinating the entire population or not, in order to prevent specific risk groups to be infected, and to impose some restrictions in order to mitigate the risk.
And there are those who oppose to either being vaccinated and accepting some restrictions,
So, a decision must be made. But we first need to agree whether the covid kills or does not kill some people, because the moment we decide on this, the options are dramatically reduced to just two.
originally posted by: generik
a reply to: Direne
masks do in fact help protect others from the wearer,
and is completely harmless to the wearer.
the same is true of restrictions put into place. they do no real harm,
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: generik
I see. Then the debate is about whether vaccinating the entire population or not, in order to prevent specific risk groups to be infected, and to impose some restrictions in order to mitigate the risk.
And there are those who oppose to either being vaccinated and accepting some restrictions, and those who accept the vaccine, but not the restrictions, and those who accept the vaccine and the restrictions altogether, and finally those who accept the restrictions, but not the vaccine.
And there is another group who secretly wishes the entire planet to be wiped out and who welcome any apocalypse (fortunately, a minority, some of them wearing bomb belts).
So, a decision must be made. But we first need to agree whether the covid kills or does not kill some people, because the moment we decide on this, the options are dramatically reduced to just two.
originally posted by: scrounger
Even the manufacture information (ALL OF THEM) on the vaccine that its main function (IF IT WORKS AS PREDICTED) is to
a. lessen the effects/symptoms from infection
b. increase the survivability from the virus”
SO SORT OF LIKE CHICKEN SOUP, if chicken soup could cause blood clots, cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, Bells Palsy, neurological issues, cancer, infertility, oh and kill you!
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: scrounger
Your reasoning is weak, and faulty. If we were to use it we would arrive at the following conclusion:
1. Police does not stop terrorists with bomb belts.
2. Police just mitigate the wide spreading of terrorist attacks with bomb belts.
3. Anyone can become a terrorist, hence...
4. it is stupid and futile to combat terrorism.
Your turn.
Let's rewind, shall we?
Polio vaccine does NOT stop polio.
Measles vaccine does NOT stop measles.
Mumps vaccine does NOT stop mumps.
Rubella vaccine does NOT stop rubella.
Rabies vaccine does NOT stop rabies.
What if that was history? Except it isn't.....all of those vaccines actually WORKED...
-------------------------
Do you see a disconnect here?
One of these things is NOT like the other? (Remember Sesame Street?)
Pepperidge Farm, remembah's....F'N right it does....
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: generik
a reply to: Direne
masks do in fact help protect others from the wearer,
Maybe, possibly, but only a tiny fraction, and certainly nothing worth imposing strict mandates everyehwere.
and is completely harmless to the wearer.
Demonstrably false. It impedes free air flow, and when worn for extended periods of time, can cause a build up of CO2 in the blood, causing brain impairment. It can also become a petri dish for replication of dangerous poathogens that are then focused and rebreathed by the wearer, causing serious risk of bacterial lung infections.
So, very far from 'completely harmless'.
the same is true of restrictions put into place. they do no real harm,
Tell that to all of the small business owners that lost their livelihoods, and the loved ones of those who were so devastated by these insane irrational lockdowns that they took their own lives.
You should be ashamed.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: Jamie2018
Please, wait your turn. The discussion is not about covid vaccination or terrorism, It is about free will and how we handle one's own decision to be or not to be vaccinated, which equals to the decision of infect or not infect others.
We could ask your nanna, but she's dead.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: JinMI
Terrorism is contagious?
Uh oh, it is! Never heard of people being radicalized by simply watching videos by Daesh? Believe it or not, it happens.
Is there something you wish to share with the class?
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: SuicideKing33
Sorry, there was a frog croaking in my window and couldn't hear your bark. Mind barking again, please?
No their reasoning as you call it is fact.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: scrounger
Your reasoning is weak, and faulty. If we were to use it we would arrive at the following conclusion:
1. Police does not stop terrorists with bomb belts.
2. Police just mitigate the wide spreading of terrorist attacks with bomb belts.
3. Anyone can become a terrorist, hence...
4. it is stupid and futile to combat terrorism.
Your turn.