It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: scrounger
Your reasoning is weak, and faulty. If we were to use it we would arrive at the following conclusion:
1. Police does not stop terrorists with bomb belts.
2. Police just mitigate the wide spreading of terrorist attacks with bomb belts.
3. Anyone can become a terrorist, hence...
4. it is stupid and futile to combat terrorism.
Your turn.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: scrounger
Your reasoning is weak, and faulty. If we were to use it we would arrive at the following conclusion:
1. Police does not stop terrorists with bomb belts.
2. Police just mitigate the wide spreading of terrorist attacks with bomb belts.
3. Anyone can become a terrorist, hence...
4. it is stupid and futile to combat terrorism.
Your turn.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: MykeNukem
Hmmm... let's see... You posit that polio vaccine worked, however, for that to be ascertained you need to be vaccinated with it in order for you to conclude it works, right? And in order to ascertain it is working not just for you, but for the rest of the population, you need to vaccinate the entire population, right? Now: is not that exactly the same situation as with the current covid-19 vaccine? Therefore, why the fuss?
Your turn.
We could ask your nanna, but she's dead.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: MykeNukem
Hmmm... let's see... You posit that polio vaccine worked, however, for that to be ascertained you need to be vaccinated with it in order for you to conclude it works, right? And in order to ascertain it is working not just for you, but for the rest of the population, you need to vaccinate the entire population, right? Now: is not that exactly the same situation as with the current covid-19 vaccine? Therefore, why the fuss?
Your turn.
originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: generik
I see. Then the debate is about whether vaccinating the entire population or not, in order to prevent specific risk groups to be infected, and to impose some restrictions in order to mitigate the risk.
And there are those who oppose to either being vaccinated and accepting some restrictions, and those who accept the vaccine, but not the restrictions, and those who accept the vaccine and the restrictions altogether, and finally those who accept the restrictions, but not the vaccine.
And there is another group who secretly wishes the entire planet to be wiped out and who welcome any apocalypse (fortunately, a minority, some of them wearing bomb belts).
So, a decision must be made. But we first need to agree whether the covid kills or does not kill some people, because the moment we decide on this, the options are dramatically reduced to just two.
It is about free will and how we handle one's own decision to be or not to be vaccinated, which equals to the decision of infect or not infect others.