Millions watch as Biden fakes his booster

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: macaronicaesar

Why fake it at all Biden is pro vax, surely he'd have gotten the real thing.

Even if it was fake why not just give him a regular flu shot?

Faking this makes no sense.

What IF that wasn't Joe Biden, an actor instead?

You know, like the Ruth Bader Ginsburg scam😃

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: macaronicaesar

Why fake it at all Biden is pro vax, surely he'd have gotten the real thing.

Even if it was fake why not just give him a regular flu shot?

Faking this makes no sense.

What IF that wasn't Joe Biden, an actor instead?

You know, like the Ruth Bader Ginsburg scam😃

What if, that's a bit of a stretch?

a reply to: HawkEyi


I had no pain at all till the next day.

Oh yeah, China joe definitely got Injected there but it with a real booster or Pfizer shot. Shill on..a reply to: Mantiss2021

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: lSkrewloosel

Look at the Thumbnail, the syringe still has the safety cover on the needle.

What you're seeing there isn't a safety cap; it's called a Luer-Lock. The Luer-Lock is what holds the needle securely in place in the syringe. I can assure you that if the safety cap were still on, the Luer-Lock wouldn't be exposed, and it wouldn't be visible at all. And depending on the brand of syringe, safety caps are typically orange or red.

This is what a modern syringe looks like when it's uncapped:



For those of you (most likely boomers) saying that the inoculation was too quick to be a legitimate inoculation, you're just stagnating on outdated information. Modern vaccinations are actually very quick and typically only take one or two seconds.

And before anybody tells me that I don't know what I'm talking about, I work in medicine. I'm seeing a lot of the Dunning-Kruger effect in this thread.

a reply to: CandidCandace

Still doesn't change the fact that they faked the location not in the actual WH.

a reply to: CandidCandace
Not enough time for aspiration though.

Aspiration is most commonly performed during an intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) injection, and is meant to ensure that the needle tip is located at the desired site, and has not accidentally punctured a blood vessel.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: CandidCandace

Still doesn't change the fact that they faked the location not in the actual WH.

Why does it matter where it occurred? They probably only did this because it's cheaper and more spaciously practical to set up a press conference at a press studio than it would be to drag a bunch of television cameras and lights into the White House and cram a bunch of reporters into the Oval Office. If this were some nefarious secret, they wouldn't have allowed photographers to take photos of the set itself.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: CandidCandace
Not enough time for aspiration though.

Aspiration is most commonly performed during an intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) injection, and is meant to ensure that the needle tip is located at the desired site, and has not accidentally punctured a blood vessel.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Aspiration is rarely necessary when giving intramuscular inoculations. Aspiration has recently been proven to only be necessary when large blood vessels are present at the recommended injection site.

a reply to: CandidCandace
I would expect the President to get it done the safest way.......to avoid any chance of the vaccine getting into the bloodstream.

Do you know what happens if the vaccine goes into the bloodstream?

a reply to: CandidCandace

Why does it matter where it occurred?

It matters. I still dont trust that any of the politicians. Their photo ops wont conceive me.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: CandidCandace
I would expect the President to get it done the safest way.......to avoid any chance of the vaccine getting into the bloodstream.

Do you know what happens if the vaccine goes into the bloodstream?

I do, but like I said, it has been proven to no longer be necessary for intramuscular injections.

ACIP does not recommend aspiration when administering vaccines because no data exist to justify the need for this practice. There are data that show that aspiration is more painful for the vaccine recipient. IM injections are not given in areas where large vessels are present.

Source.

a reply to: CandidCandace
I have just been reading this:

Is faulty injection technique behind rare clot disorder reported post Covid vaccination? - Coronavirus Outbreak News
www.indiatoday.in... -07-03

Denmark’s Statens Serum Institut has already issued a special advisory regarding vaccination technique for all Covid-19 vaccines to prevent inadvertent injection into the bloodstream. The syringe has to be aspirated to check for blood before injecting the vaccine.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Do you have any peer-reviewed sources for that claim? I tried searching it and could only find that this claim was posted by India Today, which most certainly isn't peer reviewed in any way. I get the feeling that you're just frantically Googling things to prove me wrong now because I provided you with proof that aspiration is no longer necessary for an intramuscular inoculation, and all you could do to counter it was reply with some shoddy Indian website.

I'm fully vaccinated, and the nurses who inoculated me didn't aspirate.

Are you a medical professional? I'm guessing you probably aren't. If you were, you'd know that aspirating an intramuscular inoculation is outdated, unnecessary, and actually avoided because it causes unnecessary pain for a patient.

a reply to: CandidCandace
t.co... t.co..." / Twitter
mobile.twitter.com...

There's a link on this twitter post but it is not in English.....

Here is the link:

Intramuskulær injektion på børn og voksne
www.ssi.dk...

a reply to: Itisnowagain

This only mentions in the instance that the particular vaccine is AstraZeneca. Not only that, but this isn't even peer reviewed.

Sorry, but I'm going to stick with how I was educated. These foreign websites aren't going to cut it.

a reply to: CandidCandace
You didn't tell you what happens if the vaccine goes into the bloodstream.

a reply to: CandidCandace
"Is Intravenous Vaccine Causing Clotting?"

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Vaccines typically aren't injected directly into a vein because immune cells will absorb the vaccine, isolate it, and degrade it before it has a chance to reach the lymph nodes. An intramuscular inoculation will also cause far less inflammation than an intravenous inoculation.

And you didn't answer me when I asked you if you are a medical professional.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: CandidCandace
"Is Intravenous Vaccine Causing Clotting?"

Doubt it. It's injected intra muscular.