Seems a lot of athletes dying on the pitch these days.

originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: anonentity

Do you have another supporting link other than bitchute?
If its on bitchute, its probably bogus.

I’d say if it’s on YouTube it’s bogus. Since YouTube and all other social media networks, Democrats and their supporters all worked together to censor anything that goes against their propaganda, you will now only find the other side of the story on sites like bitchute. You get what you asked for I guess.

Is it not more sensible to say that all video based evidence should he treated with due caution regardless of the platform it's hosted on?

Social media and video streaming should not be used as evidence in any serious discussion as a sole point of reference.

You can't expect to be taken seriously if you make a wild claims based on a tweet really can you.


a reply to: Middleoftheroad

a reply to: DrumsRfun

Not sure i agree with this. An uncensored platform is just that, the extreme left are free to post their own propaganda on bitchute. Can't say it works both ways, the vast majority of platforms filter and censor anything which doesn't fit the agenda. The lab leak theory being a perfect example of legitimate concerns being buried.

originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: anonentity

Do you have another supporting link other than bitchute?
If its on bitchute, its probably bogus.

LOL, but if the same data is on You Tube, it's probably legit. DERP!

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: DrumsRfun

If its on bitchute, its probably bogus.

Your comment is ridiculous and suspicious
It's a hosting platform.
Get lost with that bs mr. Factchecker

Bitchute is notorious as for being the place where people post videos that would be taken down elsewhere for being factually incorrect. Anything posted there should be taken with a much larger grain of salt than a story printed through a more reputable platform.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: anonentity

Do you have another supporting link other than bitchute?
If its on bitchute, its probably bogus.

LOL, but if the same data is on You Tube, it's probably legit. DERP!

It's statistically more likely to be so. But it would help if the creators cited their sources and included their base data.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

For going against official narratives you mean.

a reply to: anonentity

There was an article on this from one of the British news groups a couple of years ago, covering seemingly fit and healthy young men who died suddenly of heart defects that they did not know that they had. I think that it was spurred on by that soccer player who almost died on the pitch a couple of years ago (Farbrio, I think).

The conclusion was there there area number of heart defects that exist in the male population, but which do not have any serious effects for the majority of people for their entire lives, and only become apparent under certain specific situations. Such as periods of dehydration and extreme excursion. Which is why they seem to effect only athletes.

I believe that the number of deaths hasn't increased, but the coverage of them in the media has.

originally posted by: SecretKnowledge
a reply to: anonentity

Chemtrails.

Im not joking.

Weren't they supposed to cause fibers to form under your skin?

Naw, it's usually becuase they make stuff up for clicks and ad revenue from the guilble.


a reply to: Grenade

But most here ARE trusting the guy in the video just like they trust the pillow guy on voter fraud. Or Rudy about the Ukraine and Hunter Biden. Or rituals by Dems that sacrifice babies and drink their blood. Or that the insurrection was some kind of White House Tour. Or that the people who broke the law on Jan 6th are being persecuted. I could go on but YES they believe the guy in the video WITHOUT A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT.

It's laughable sometimes, but it's reality.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: AaarghZombies

For going against official narratives you mean.

The official narrative isn't always wrong.

For example, deleting tide pod challenge videos, videos saying that washing in concentrated bleach can stop Morgellons, or those fake child abduction messages on Instagram that get complete strangers beaten to death.

Besides, football players dying during games doesn't go against the narrative, if anything it's a pretty mainstream issues.

a reply to: MiddleInsite

It's sad. Conservatives used to be the group of critical thinking, while liberals used to be the group that acted on emotions, but so many conservatives these days seem to think with their hearts first and their heads second.

It's why so many people on sites like this are getting so upset over doom porn that used to be a liberal thing.

a reply to: nonspecific

My official job title is Advanced Datacomms Specialist, i can assure you the algorithms and key word indicators are geared toward filtering and censoring specific terms, most of which appear to be conservative leaning topics. Gullibility should be attributed to those who think Youtube is an unbiased and fair hosting platform.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

How many flat earth videos still reside on those platforms, you sure it is about being factual?

Your skills are impressing me more and more.
Fire is so important!
Can’t have things raw in the age of Covid....😎


a reply to: DrumsRfun

a reply to: AaarghZombies

None of these extreme examples have anything to do with this conversation or topic. We're talking about political and ideological censorship. When big tech have the audacity to censor the POTUS you know there's an agenda.

a reply to: anonentity

The delta variant is affecting younger people and kids more than the alpha did.