It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
I posted it.
Too funny!!!
You not understanding how a child is enrolled in school is hilarious.
originally posted by: seagull
Your hyperbole is showing, my friend.
No school anywhere is allowed to "smack around" kids. Not even in Georgia. Or Alabama, for that matter.
A smack on the rump doesn't qualify as "smacking around".
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: shooterbrody
I posted it.
Too funny!!!
You not understanding how a child is enrolled in school is hilarious.
You posted how a lone charter school has a consent form, that isn't public school where you must opt out of the state sanctioned beating program.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: shooterbrody
Sure, when his anecdotal story works its way into the statute which doesn't require consent let us know.
originally posted by: HairForceOne
Touching people's children is either a whole new level of bravery or a whole new level of stupidity. You have to be brave to be that stupid maybe??
The teacher was so scared of the 'Rona that not only did she invade the "social distance", she literally touched their faces.
Again it's all about compliance at any cost. The teacher is fortunate that none of the parents put their hands on her. I just can't even imagine the ignorance it took to make someone think this would be even remotely ok.
They need to be unemployed. ASAP.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: shooterbrody
I'll take the wording of the statute which mentions consent a grand total of zero times yet somehow you've read it and think that word appears.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Klassified
Straight up child abuse, the teacher should be fired and charged, also stripped of the ability to "teach" children.