It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"For our study, we wanted to determine if effects of mask mandates and use were observable in the general population," Dr. Damian Guerra, an assistant professor of biology at the University of Louisville, said. "Essentially, did the theory of mask effectiveness hold up on a population-wide level?"
"It appears that mandates and typical mask use among the public have no substantial impact on COVID-19 growth," Guerra said.
"While growth rates did decline in states after mask mandates became effective, rates declined to a similar degree in states without mandates," he added.
"Surgical or cloth masks are safe for most people for short periods of time. However, chronic use is associated with enhanced susceptibility to skin barrier breakdown due to pH changes in facial skin. This can promote subsequent infection by bacteria," he explained.
"Repeatedly taking off and putting on the same mask, touching a mask with unwashed hands, or wearing a used mask increase the likelihood of upper respiratory tract infections," he added, noting that health care workers have reported greater fatigue, headaches, and psychological stress from mask-wearing. The study also notes that masks can "interfere with social learning in children."
originally posted by: Klassified
Yet another (peer-reviewed) study confirming what most ATS members already know.
"For our study, we wanted to determine if effects of mask mandates and use were observable in the general population," Dr. Damian Guerra, an assistant professor of biology at the University of Louisville, said. "Essentially, did the theory of mask effectiveness hold up on a population-wide level?"
"It appears that mandates and typical mask use among the public have no substantial impact on COVID-19 growth," Guerra said.
"While growth rates did decline in states after mask mandates became effective, rates declined to a similar degree in states without mandates," he added.
Article link
Study link
Because this topic has been so outrageously politicized, and the country is so divided along party lines rather than what the science actually says, I expect that this study will be ignored, squashed, or fade away, and its authors will suffer something akin to being cancelled. I'd like to be wrong about that, but the last 18 months plus doesn't give me much hope for any other outcome.
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: rickymouse
I don't think that peer review is perfect, but this study IS peer reviewed, which makes it harder to make the study say what you want it to say. The study disagrees with some of your points. However, as I have already stated, I DO agree that masks should be a choice, not a mandate.
originally posted by: joejack1949
I like grocery shopping without being bothered, so I wear a mask. I also like having a job, so I wear a mask at work. I am a sheeple.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Klassified
Study proves that states where people ignore mask mandates gain little to no benefit from having mask mandates?