Lab Founder Shows "Vaccine" Spike Protein Damages Vital Organs

a reply to: CupcakeKarma

Oh, and why hasn't the CEO of pfizer taken HIS oh-so-safe dose of covid vaccine.... ? He was denied entry into Israel because he hasn't taken his vax.

Sort of. That was in early March after he had the first shot but not yet the second. He was not fully vaccinated. He was not "denied entry", he cancelled his trip because he did not meet the requirements.

a reply to: Phage
[qupte] Vaccines are not treatments.

Very many millions of people have been vaccinated with very few adverse reactions which are direct attributable to the vaccine. Similar to any other vaccine.

I disagree and the Vaccine Injury website identifies deaths and blatant injuries associated with vaccines.

a reply to: Phage

Ok.

But who the heck cares how many attorneys are involved. It's their job to sue people, for just about anything.

Phage,

I have never heard of 100 attorneys in a joint Class Action Lawsuit.

I think it implies that there is SO MUCH fraud, coercion, deception, and violations of Human Rights regarding the covid fraud and illegal mandates of experimental covid vaccine, that at least 100 attorneys were needed...

a reply to: CupcakeKarma

I have never heard of 100 attorneys in a joint Class Action Lawsuit.

Probably not, in one that ever went anywhere.

a reply to: Phage

Vaccines are not treatments.

Phage,

That covid pus cocktail is being USED as a preventative treatment and it is NOT WORKiNG.

If it is... again, please provide the peer-reviewed tests of covid vaccine safety and effectiveness as compared to HCQ and ivermectin or other remedies.

Even a link for a peer-reviewed test that the covid cocktail is SAFE.

There is not one.

But there IS a LONG history of successful and safe HCQ and Ivermectin use.

a reply to: Phage

Probably not, in one that ever went anywhere.

Phage,

I'm convinced you would hope that is the case... and one must wonder why....

Do you also dismiss the 1,000 medical doctors attesting to the success with HCQ and Ivermectin ?

a reply to: CupcakeKarma

You might find this interesting

www.cdc.gov...

Twenty-one cases were determined to be anaphylaxis (a rate of 11.1 per million doses administered), including 17 in persons with a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, seven of whom had a history of anaphylaxis.

www.cdc.gov...

Within VAERS, 497 reports of myocarditis after the second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose were received for persons aged ≥18 years. The reporting rate of myocarditis overall among adults was 3.5 cases per million

a reply to: CupcakeKarma

Do you also dismiss the 1,000 medical doctors attesting to the success with HCQ and Ivermectin ?

I haven't seen the full list but from what I've heard from some of them, let's just say that I'm skeptical.
Things like this for example:

Michele Avissar-Whiting, PhD, editor-in-chief of the preprint server Research Square, said in an emailed statement that the study was withdrawn on July 14 "because we were presented with evidence of both plagiarism and anomalies in the dataset associated with the study, neither of which could reasonably be addressed by the author issuing a revised version of the paper."

www.medpagetoday.com...

originally posted by: CupcakeKarma
a reply to: Phage

Ok.

But who the heck cares how many attorneys are involved. It's their job to sue people, for just about anything.

Phage,

I have never heard of 100 attorneys in a joint Class Action Lawsuit.

I think it implies that there is SO MUCH fraud, coercion, deception, and violations of Human Rights regarding the covid fraud and illegal mandates of experimental covid vaccine, that at least 100 attorneys were needed...

I dont know where you live but where i live that would be one law firm so its not that impressive.

a reply to: research100
Factcheck.org is as trustworthy as snopes. Just stop with that noise.

originally posted by: dragonridr

Ironically there has never been and medication that has gone through the testing the covid virus has. People have no idea of the scale of the studies and how many were done by multiple countries throughout the world.

Safety-wise its shown to cause fewer adverse reactions than a lot of medications in use. For example, birth control or even aspirin yes people die from taking aspirin.

I think some people instead of Googling the vaccine they need to Google "long COVID" see the Harvard study.


I also think people have no clue to what actually goes into testing. They keep saying its a 10 to 15 year process, but it could be a 50 year process too, but when it gets approved by the FDA for human testing it can go rather quickly and people don't think that Phase 1 is like 20 or less people, Phase 2 is like 80 to 100 and Phase 3 is like 3000 at the most.

That is it for testing, then it is monitoring after release to the public. People really think drugs are magically tested for years on end until released? lol

originally posted by: CupcakeKarma

The Vaccine Injury website identifies horrified adverse reactions to the covid vaccine AND death associated with that vaccine....

What site is that?

a reply to: Phage

If it's not FDA approved, it's experimental. If the FDA approves it, will it be with any data post-authorization-of-use date?

a reply to: GammaD

It wouldn't make sense to not include that in the decision. Otherwise, why bother with the EUA?

Now, if you're talking about things posted here (magnets, glowing under UV light, bitchute videos) probably not.

a reply to: Phage

glowing under UV light

Tell me that was hyperbole on your part?

Please?

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

You missed it? Took a little while, but it was relocated appropriately eventually.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: CupcakeKarma

The Vaccine Injury website identifies horrified adverse reactions to the covid vaccine AND death associated with that vaccine....

What site is that?

That would be: VAERS site
It's part of the CDC... scroll to bottom of page for next link.

BTW: there is a 928.8% increase of adverse events this year over last year, and 2021 accounts for 38,87% of the database.

a reply to: Jimy718
That's the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting site. We're looking for the Vaccine Injury site.

BTW: there is a 928.8% increase of adverse events this year over last year, and 2021 accounts for 38,87% of the database.

Was there a requirement to report events in 2020, or ever? Because there is now;

regardless of causality

www.cdc.gov...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Jimy718
That's the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting site. We're looking for the Vaccine Injury site.

BTW: there is a 928.8% increase of adverse events this year over last year, and 2021 accounts for 38,87% of the database.

Was there a requirement to report events in 2020, or ever? Because there is now;

regardless of causality

www.cdc.gov...

You can find vax injury in the same database; just set up the proper search parameters.

Visit the site and you will see that it has always been the same requirements. They have been collecting the same data for decades, and you can find data as far back as 1921, though, the older the report the less data may be present. We should be aware that not all adverse events are reported.

Prolly shouldn't go into the total failure the database design is, or it's ability to export useable data. The data available for download seem to be from June, not August. And, I can't import it into SQL server without extensive editing.

a reply to: Phage

*groans*

Yes, thankfully I missed it. Then you had to come show it to me!

Not sure if I can forgive you for that, Phage...

TheRedneck