It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...author unknown
Advice on confusion
No matter how many parallels you will find
There will always be a straight line
Be compelled to follow it!
Be encouraging in the forming of friendship
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
Exploit, take advantage from,?? Forget good or evil. Do you like to take advantage of people, to exploit them? yes or no?
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
My own experience is that most Americans don't understand what is or isn't socialism, and they end up describing some kind of wacky version of Communism as described on a 1950s public service announcement.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
Exploit, take advantage from,?? Forget good or evil. Do you like to take advantage of people, to exploit them? yes or no?
This is a nonsense argument. Your list of definitions also includes "benefit from", which isn't necessarily synonymous with "exploit". Like I said, there's nothing wrong with earning an income from your work. However, a moral issue may arise when business owners decide not to fairly compensate their employees for the work they do. All of us have a choice where to work, or at least we would in a thriving economy which wasn't dominated by monopolies.
We also have a choice where to shop and which businesses to support. At the end of the day every business has a choice what to pay their employees, every person can decide not to work for slave wages, and every person can decide not to support businesses which pay slave wages by boycotting them. So I have quite a bit of trouble placing all the blame on capitalism or CEO's when in reality it's every single one of us who allow it to happen, just like we've allowed them to destroy the economy during this pandemic.
When total authoritarianism rises the only thing I will blame is the conformist masses.
Private ownership is not evil, it provides individual liberty. And as I also explained, capitalism doesn't require debt-based money to function. I'm starting to believe that this destruction of the economy is intentional so all the suffering can be blamed on the failings of capitalism rather than those who did everything possible to ensure our economy would fail. Capitalism has created some of the most powerful and prosperous nations on Earth, it's only when they succumb to excessive socialism do they fail spectacularly, as we've seen time and time again throughout history.
Where exactly did I write that TPTB should control all the capital? What you don't seem to realize is that heavily socialist systems and communist systems are exactly what you fear, all resources are controlled by a highly centralized government and there is no private ownership of resources. The only semi-logical reason for doing such a thing is to reduce overuse of resources by allowing the government to decide when and how resources get used. But I deeply oppose that sort of centralized big gov due to the destruction of freedom and ownership that it entails.
Explain to me exactly why it's evil for a business to earn a profit on a product they developed? If I create a work of art which took me hundreds of hours, why is it evil to desire some compensation for that work? If I purchase a blank canvas, put some paint on it, and then sell it for more than the cost of the canvas, that isn't evil, it's called making a living by doing actual work. Sure, some businesses may have ludicrous profit margins, but no one is forced to buy their products, not unless they become a monopoly which controls the entire market. That's why we should be working to ensure that doesn't happen instead of fostering it.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: ToLiveIsToDie
Youāre describing crony capitalism... capitalism is in essence a system in which innovation and entrepreneurship can be rewarded if there is value added and demand created for products and services. There is incentive to produce and be productive and market forces provide balance within the system (only if it is not corrupted by central plannersā intervention or cronyism, both of which have totally corrupted the system in the West at this point)
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: ToLiveIsToDie
Free market and free trade *is* capitalism. All capitalism is is the free exchange of goods and services.
If I have a garden and grow a lot of tomatoes, more than I can eat or use for reseed, I can choose to sell or trade some to my neighbors who do not have tomatoes but want or need some. I can either choose to take their money or take items from them in trade for my tomatoes. Perhaps one has hens that lay eggs and we trade that - eggs for tomatoes. But maybe another only has money because the service he or she provides is not one I need, but the money represents that those skills are of worth, so I take the money which I can then exchange with others for goods and services I do need, and I give that neighbor my tomatoes.
Between us, we all work out acceptable rates of exchange: eggs for tomatoes, money for tomatoes.
That is capitalism.
It is also capitalism if I need some help in my garden and I choose to hire on a neighbor for their labor. Again, we work out an acceptable rate of exchange. Perhaps they choose to work for tomatoes or maybe they work for money or it could even be a combination of the two: tomatoes and money. But they are exchanging their labor in this case for my goods and/or money.
Government intervention is in no way capitalist, and it causes distortions in every capitalist market as that market moves farther and farther away from free trade.
Now, we can argue the necessity of a government intervention, but looking at the cramped distorted shell we have today and angrily declaring the capitalism doesn't work is just plain silly.