If long term side effects manifest in 5 years from the vaccines....

I'm not sure how any of the medications in the OP are relevant to vaccines - they're all to be taken multiple times a day for years to keep constant levels in the blood serum, a vaccine is a one off.

I'm on Lyrica and other anti-epileptics, have to take 100 tablets a month to make sure the levels of the active ingredients in my blood serum are constant - full blood counts and liver function tests have to be done every six monthsdue to the danger they pose to liver and kidneys. Bloods are checked every week when starting or increasing dosage due to the risk of
death ,


A vaccine is a oone off and leaves your bloodstreaam in a a few hours or days. It's scientifically impossible for one to cause issues months, years or decades after you've had it .

a reply to: zardust

No I'm an applied mathematician who spent a few years working for UCL Head of Pharmacology prof David Colquhoun exposing bad science, the impact agenda and lecturing in correct statistical analysis.

It's scientifically impossible due to how vaccines work, there's no scientifically known mechanism a vaccine could cause a health condition several years after it has left your body and there are no scientific testing methods to determine if a single vax was the cause or the cause was the trillions of variables and environmental factors that would occur every day of that five year period were the cause.

Basic science 101.

a reply to: zardust

Yes they're all made up claims by anti-vax, disgraced ex-Dr Andrew Wakefield who caused the whole MMR-Autism hoax in 90s/2000s. There's no evidence to support the claims and Wakefield has been banned from the profession for spreading false information.

It's not my fault you don't know Wakefield was the first person to make the false claims in his '98 paper on early childhood vax and has spent the last 20 years spreading false adjuvant prion disease and Alzheimers info. It's common knowlege Wakefield was the first to make the claims in the UK - it's one of the most famous scientific frauds in the world. If you had a passing knowlege of science you would be aware of these facts as it's been the biggest medical scandal since thalidomide.

Aluminium is in breastmilk and formula milk - everyone on earth is exposed to it daily in their early years; none of them get the conditions you claim as it's made up by snake oil salesmen who lack basic logic and scientific knowlege it plays a central role in immune system development.

Here's his recent video where he makes the false claims Covid vaccines will do the same in five years.
newtube.app...

Well yes as it's true and he's a world leading expert on the subject and specialises in exposing psuedo-science wheras the claims of prion disease and alzhiemers are proven quackery made by well known fraudsters and quacks. Ring him up and ask him if you want or read our work here: www.dcscience.net...

No it wasn't - a couple were opinions submitted to Nature - humans have kidneys and a blood brain barrier,

a reply to: zardust

You mean this pubmed paper? pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Might COVID-19 vaccines sensitize humans to antibody-dependent enhanced (ADE) breakthrough infections? This is unlikely because coronavirus diseases in humans lack the clinical, epidemiological, biological, or pathological attributes of ADE disease exemplified by dengue viruses (DENV). In contrast to DENV, SARS and MERS CoVs predominantly infect respiratory epithelium, not macrophages.

ADE reactions require microphages. It's been observed in cats but not in humans.

Here's a paper on the vital role Aluminium plays in immune system development pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

The dangers o antivax groups social media presence

Far from being fully informative, A Voice for Choice promotes long debunked theories regarding vaccination that are unsupported in the peer-reviewed, scientific literature. For example, A Voice For Choice posits on its website that it is “rare that any kid completely escapes from some effect caused by the toxic materials in vaccines.” It links vaccinations to cancer, autoimmune disease, seizures and even peanut allergies.

A Voice for Choice also purports to offer parents comprehensive information about vaccine ingredients. However, in reality it is a platform that promotes misleading information. For example, A Voice for Choice's website states that vaccines contain aluminum, a “neurotoxin,” in an amount that exceeds levels deemed safe by the EPA. Aluminum is incorporated into some vaccinations as an ‘adjuvant’ to increase the immune response.4 An infant may receive about four milligrams of aluminum from vaccinations during the first year of his or her life.5

However, the website omits the fact that infants may also receive about 7 milligrams of aluminum from nursing, as it is found naturally in breast milk.6 It also fails to mention that adults ingest 7 to 9 mg of aluminum per day.7

a reply to: Stupidsecrets

Trust the mon- uh, SCIENCE!

I'd already explained why dengue fever and studies in cats and ferrets don't apply in my post above - I even bolded it for you for clarity. I've adressesed the false brain deposit claims in my last few posts - it's not my fault you haven't read or comprehended any of the studies and don't know what kidneys and the blood brain barrier are or the fact the ammount in vaccines is less than 1/100th the minimum aluminium salt levels required for someone with advanced kidney failure to suffer adverse effects from.

Humans have stomachs, intestines and digestive enzymes to break down what we ingest and release it into the blood stream, it's how we stay alive and something most five year olds are aware of.

It's clear you have no scientific education, haven't read any of the papers either of us have posted so there's no point wasting any more of my time

a reply to: zardust

The paper I posted was from 13 Nov 2020 you retard. Covid-19 didn't even exist in 2013. How could a Covid-19 vax ADE paper be written in 2013? Use your brain.

The publcation date and edition is the very first line of the paper I posted - as are all pubmed papers - you would know this if you had ever used pubmed or read a scientific paper before.

J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 13;222(12):1946-1950. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa518.

Learn to read dates before pretending to understand science or have read 'ALL the ADE papers'.

J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 13;222(12):1946-1950. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa518.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

a reply to: Stupidsecrets

How can a vaccine, taken in small doses, and very few times, have some severe effect that takes years to manifest?

What mechanism, chemical or biological, would it possibly use?

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Stupidsecrets

How can a vaccine, taken in small doses, and very few times, have some severe effect that takes years to manifest?

What mechanism, chemical or biological, would it possibly use?

Add in the ingredients are only in your system for a few days and it is not a drug, but a RNA molecule and cells have 200k in them doing what RNA does, like make protein. This has got to be the most elegant approach in the history of medicine. No nasty drugs, just RNA working with the natural processes of the body.

originally posted by: zardust
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

How does RNA cause long term illnesses as it is gone after a day.... There might be a case where someone's immune system freaks out over it, but that would be known rather quickly. What can any RNA do? RNA is a natural simple process in your cells so mRNA is not a drug per say that could have a ton of negative reactions.

a reply to: ToLiveIsToDie

There was also that strange push for a few weeks back in early 2019 claiming there was zero benefits to taking vitamins.

But I am sure big Pharm and our diligent leaders only have our best interests in mind, and are so busy protecting us that they have forgotten all about our mental health, and the benefits of a healthy and natural life style.

a reply to: shaemac

Agreed. Them too!

I have to limit the targets of my indignant outrage, lately, or I'd lose all focus.