[Smoking Gun] Document from 2018 Details Roadmap for Vaccine Passports - Ultimate Conspiracy Proof?

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

Yessir.

It's about control for sure. Global coordination to gain control.

The VaxPorts will enable that.

No buying - can't shop without one.
No selling - can't sell without one, because you can't buy without one.
No travelling - can't move to and fro

I'm done deciding, that is history.

I won't get the C-Jab and if I lose my job, tough titty.

a reply to: BatSars

"People love this because it will stop the spread of disease"

Honestly, it's talk like that that leave me hoping for a population reduction. Yes, yes it is but it also means your no better then cattle.

Joe says you aren't that smart if you believe this nonsense and have not gotten the vaccine. What do you say about that? I follow Joe and the SCIENCE.. the science says that these unapproved vaccines cure covid...sometimes with hardly any side effects most of the time. BUT please wear masks as the vaccines increase your viral load and you become a super spreader( sounds healthy right?). And the children....the children. i once knew a guy named soda pop.... he like to rub my legs.... WAIT---sorry- back to Joes story....we need to all wear masks , no matter what because of the children. the children are at a lower risk from covid than a shark attack, but keep swimming in the ocean and wear a mask at all times while in class, at a friends or while indoors anywhere. We need to stop this disease in its tracks...except for at the border where we can let in all comers unchecked and drop them off all over the united states. Don't worry we will mask up those illegals( OOPS)- undocumented vistors/permanent wards of the state. The mask science says that masks are ineffective and maybe we should wear more than one just to be safe. Like the police say..if you can express your discomfort....YOU CAN BREATHE.

originally posted by: BatSars
ec.europa.eu...

Forgive the emphatic language of the title, but my God, where do I start here ... I'm actually at a loss for words and, while I hope this document is legitimate, I also kinda' hope it isn't.

The very first "action" listed in that pdf, from the European Commission, says everything you need to know.

Examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens (that takes into account potentially different national vaccination schedules and), that is compatible with electronic immunisation information systems and recognised for use across borders, without duplicating work at national level.

The timeline starts in 2018. In 2019, a "Feasibility study for the development of a common EU vaccination card" was to begin and was to end in 2021, which would lead into 2022 with the "Commission proposal for a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens."

The next 'action' is as follows:

Produce on a regular basis a Report on the State of Vaccine Confidence in the EU, to monitor attitudes to vaccination. Based on that report and taking into account related work by WHO, present guidance that can support Member States in countering vaccine hesitancy.

2018 would begin "Guidance on countering vaccine hesitancy tailored to specific needs identified by the Member States and/or vaccine specific issues"

Here's a link to one of the survey/studies: europa.eu...

And it continues the 'Action' points:

Convene a Coalition for Vaccination to bring together European associations of healthcare workers as well as relevant students’ associations in the field, to commit to delivering accurate information to the public, combating myths and exchanging best practice.

I mean, I'm not making this up. If you don't believe me, please click on the PDF above. I'm kind of at a loss for words here, but if you needed any proof that this entire thing was a coordinated effort, then here it is.

The only explanation is "coincidence."

Can't say I've ever seen this many coincidences surrounding one 'event' that didn't prove to be true later on. Gulf of Tonkin "coincidences" come to mind.

Thoughts? Can anyone debunk this if possible? Yikes.

a reply to: BatSars

Agreed. It does seem kind of cocked up. Almost like you can sort of predict what's going to happen tomorrow. Just too many coincidences to be "coincidence" anymore.

I think it begs more questions about Covid itself than it does about this vaccine control, Big Bro., thing though.

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: BatSars

It's real.

There is lots of credible links to this.

They've been working hard on this for awhile.

Wet dream come true.

Here's some more:

Official Journal of the European Union

A.

whereas in December 2010 global health leaders committed to ensuring the discovery, development, and global delivery of life-saving vaccines, especially to the poorest countries, declaring the following 10 years (2011-2020) the ‘Decade of Vaccines’;

Lot's of searchable, official info on that site for people smarter than me.

Oh no! They've been working on the delivery of life saving vaccines especially to poor countries?

The evil swines...

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: BatSars

It's real.

There is lots of credible links to this.

They've been working hard on this for awhile.

Wet dream come true.

Here's some more:

Official Journal of the European Union

A.

whereas in December 2010 global health leaders committed to ensuring the discovery, development, and global delivery of life-saving vaccines, especially to the poorest countries, declaring the following 10 years (2011-2020) the ‘Decade of Vaccines’;

Lot's of searchable, official info on that site for people smarter than me.

Oh no! They've been working on the delivery of life saving vaccines especially to poor countries?

The evil swines...

I hope you don't lose the plot this fast in your court cases.

I think the issue here will be VaxPorts.

That's something to be worried about IMO

Why would you not like credible information? It's not even a conspiracy at this point, it's reality.

a reply to: MykeNukem

Did you even read your source? Apparently not.

I tend to read my briefs. Suggest you do the same. And don't get personal with me.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

Did you even read your source? Apparently not.

I tend to read my briefs. Suggest you do the same. And don't get personal with me.

My source is OFFICIAL so is the OP's.

Did you read it is the better question?

I wasn't the one mocking, you were.

I don't do personal attacks, unless in response to one, occasionally.

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

Did you even read your source? Apparently not.

I tend to read my briefs. Suggest you do the same. And don't get personal with me.

My source is OFFICIAL so is the OP's.

Did you read it is the better question?

I wasn't the one mocking, you were.

I don't do personal attacks, unless in response to one, occasionally.

The OP? Like I'll take that seriously. But you will.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

Did you even read your source? Apparently not.

I tend to read my briefs. Suggest you do the same. And don't get personal with me.

My source is OFFICIAL so is the OP's.

Did you read it is the better question?

I wasn't the one mocking, you were.

I don't do personal attacks, unless in response to one, occasionally.

The OP? Like I'll take that seriously. But you will.

Yes, yes I will.

That was weird.

Pretend for a minute that COVID never happened and there was no global crisis. Then reread the action-items outlined in that "plan".

Still outraged?

y to: BatSars

It's an ID card under another name ....."Halt papers please"

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

Did you even read your source? Apparently not.

I tend to read my briefs. Suggest you do the same. And don't get personal with me.

My source is OFFICIAL so is the OP's.

Did you read it is the better question?

I wasn't the one mocking, you were.

I don't do personal attacks, unless in response to one, occasionally.

The OP? Like I'll take that seriously. But you will.

I can't take the OP seriously but that source does not seem to say anything nefarious. Providing life saving vaccines to poorer countries? A bad thing?

Perhaps you can link to how anything in that source is a bad thing?

Thanking you in advance.

Oops! That was meant to be a reply to Mr Nukem.

Apologies. Fat finger.

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: BatSars

It's real.

There is lots of credible links to this.

They've been working hard on this for awhile.

Wet dream come true.

Here's some more:

Official Journal of the European Union

A.

whereas in December 2010 global health leaders committed to ensuring the discovery, development, and global delivery of life-saving vaccines, especially to the poorest countries, declaring the following 10 years (2011-2020) the ‘Decade of Vaccines’;

Lot's of searchable, official info on that site for people smarter than me.

Oh no! They've been working on the delivery of life saving vaccines especially to poor countries?

The evil swines...

I hope you don't lose the plot this fast in your court cases.

I think the issue here will be VaxPorts.

That's something to be worried about IMO

Why would you not like credible information? It's not even a conspiracy at this point, it's reality.

So please post something from this source that backs up these claims of nefarious purpose?

Thanks in advance.

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

Did you even read your source? Apparently not.

I tend to read my briefs. Suggest you do the same. And don't get personal with me.

My source is OFFICIAL so is the OP's.

Did you read it is the better question?

I wasn't the one mocking, you were.

I don't do personal attacks, unless in response to one, occasionally.

Should not the EU, or anyone else, make plans for future pandemics?

So, if ebola got much worse, for instance, and lethally airborne making plans for such an eventuality is in some way evil?

Why?

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: BatSars

Well, Fauci and others are going to say they've warned about needing this kind of thing for decades. Covid just happens to be the virus du jour right now, but they've wanted this kind of a system since the early 20th century.

I'm not saying it's right, but I don't think you're going to get a lot of people arguing it hasn't been said for years either.

Control is control; people in power want control. No real new news there. The big differences now though is they now have something like Covid to use to justify it. Whereas, before they could only justify it with hypotheticals.

Control is such a vague term. What does control look like? Access to information you would otherwise need a warrant to divulge. Application of information to compile a database that is unconstitutional. Technology that is used to profile consumers and activate or disable their civil rights. Let's not reduce these consequences to a simple word.

This isn’t the mark of the beast yet but it will be. Get it and serve satan or serve God and die. Make your choice.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

"You're either lying to me, or to Klaus Schwab, which is it?" - Some Dutch politician to the Dutch Prime Minister.

Great 2 min vid that encapsulates so much of what is going on!