[Smoking Gun] Document from 2018 Details Roadmap for Vaccine Passports - Ultimate Conspiracy Proof?

ec.europa.eu...

Forgive the emphatic language of the title, but my God, where do I start here ... I'm actually at a loss for words and, while I hope this document is legitimate, I also kinda' hope it isn't.

The very first "action" listed in that pdf, from the European Commission, says everything you need to know.

Examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens (that takes into account potentially different national vaccination schedules and), that is compatible with electronic immunisation information systems and recognised for use across borders, without duplicating work at national level.

The timeline starts in 2018. In 2019, a "Feasibility study for the development of a common EU vaccination card" was to begin and was to end in 2021, which would lead into 2022 with the "Commission proposal for a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens."

The next 'action' is as follows:

Produce on a regular basis a Report on the State of Vaccine Confidence in the EU, to monitor attitudes to vaccination. Based on that report and taking into account related work by WHO, present guidance that can support Member States in countering vaccine hesitancy.

2018 would begin "Guidance on countering vaccine hesitancy tailored to specific needs identified by the Member States and/or vaccine specific issues"

Here's a link to one of the survey/studies: europa.eu...

And it continues the 'Action' points:

Convene a Coalition for Vaccination to bring together European associations of healthcare workers as well as relevant students’ associations in the field, to commit to delivering accurate information to the public, combating myths and exchanging best practice.

I mean, I'm not making this up. If you don't believe me, please click on the PDF above. I'm kind of at a loss for words here, but if you needed any proof that this entire thing was a coordinated effort, then here it is.

The only explanation is "coincidence."

Can't say I've ever seen this many coincidences surrounding one 'event' that didn't prove to be true later on. Gulf of Tonkin "coincidences" come to mind.

Thoughts? Can anyone debunk this if possible? Yikes.

a reply to: BatSars

It’s real. But you’re a crazed conspiracy theorist to talk about it though.

originally posted by: zardust
a reply to: BatSars

It’s real. But you’re a crazed conspiracy theorist to talk about it though.

LOL

a reply to: BatSars

It's real.

There is lots of credible links to this.

They've been working hard on this for awhile.

Wet dream come true.

Here's some more:

Official Journal of the European Union

A.

whereas in December 2010 global health leaders committed to ensuring the discovery, development, and global delivery of life-saving vaccines, especially to the poorest countries, declaring the following 10 years (2011-2020) the ‘Decade of Vaccines’;

Lot's of searchable, official info on that site for people smarter than me.

a reply to: BatSars

Gibbs' Rule #39: There is no such thing as a coincidence.

2nd.

I’m at work and can’t read the whole
Article and pdf, I will when I get home , but I’m curious where this info came from ? I actually have no doubt that there a Allan like this in the works , the whole thing reminds me of the nazis passports and George soros behind all of May his today .

originally posted by: Meldionne1
I’m at work and can’t read the whole
Article and pdf, I will when I get home , but I’m curious where this info came from ? I actually have no doubt that there a Allan like this in the works , the whole thing reminds me of the nazis passports and George soros behind all of May his today .

It's hosted on the EU's own website: ec.europa.eu... so it came from them. o.0

a reply to: BatSars

Well, Fauci and others are going to say they've warned about needing this kind of thing for decades. Covid just happens to be the virus du jour right now, but they've wanted this kind of a system since the early 20th century.

I'm not saying it's right, but I don't think you're going to get a lot of people arguing it hasn't been said for years either.

Control is control; people in power want control. No real new news there. The big differences now though is they now have something like Covid to use to justify it. Whereas, before they could only justify it with hypotheticals.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: BatSars

Well, Fauci and others are going to say they've warned about needing this kind of thing for decades. Covid just happens to be the virus du jour right now, but they've wanted this kind of a system since the early 20th century.

I'm not saying it's right, but I don't think you're going to get a lot of people arguing it hasn't been said for years either.

Control is control; people in power want control. No real new news there. The big differences now though is they now have something like Covid to use to justify it. Whereas, before they could only justify it with hypotheticals.

Sure, that's a fair point and you're probably right - that will be the chosen response, no doubt.

But where I take issue - like, REALLY take issue - is the prophetic nature of this document. All of those actionable items listed began in 2019 and would end in 2021, with the "solution" being offered in 2022.

That is far too accurate for my taste.

But again, you are right in your response, totally.

a reply to: BatSars

It began WAY before 2019.

That document arose from prior sessions.

As per the link I provided in my previous post.

This is just their time to shine.

a reply to: BatSars

What? You never seen a international certificate of vaccination?

This is the 2008 version. I got my first one in 1977.
My last one got lost in Taiwan in 2004.

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: BatSars

It began WAY before 2019.

That document arose from prior sessions.

As per the link I provided in my previous post.

This is just their time to shine.

Yes, I saw the link and I appreciate you posting it here. The item you were responding to, though, was specific to that document and the timeline thereof.

I mean, it could all be a coincidence, but those coincidences sure do happen a lot these days. lol

At any rate, I appreciate the sharing of that document! It didn't go unnoticed and I even +1'd you twice!

That actually brings me to an ATS-specific question: I've noticed an ability to add another star when I refresh the page. Do those go away or can I give the same post multiple stars?

a reply to: BatSars

Do those go away or can I give the same post multiple stars?

They go away.

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: BatSars

What? You never seen a international certificate of vaccination?

This is the 2008 version. I got my first one in 1977.
My last one got lost in Taiwan in 2004.

When it is coupled with a concerted effort to ensure govt-sponsored propaganda is the only thing people see and also fits neatly into the exact timeline of the very next "pandemic," no.

Counter online vaccine misinformation and develop evidence-based information tools and guidance to support Member States in responding to vaccine hesitancy, in line with the Commission Communication on tackling online disinformation.

Online and offline promotion of the new information tools (through social media, search engine optimisation, specialised media) in particular towards the sectors of health care, education, social services, media

Source

a reply to: BatSars

"Can't say I've ever seen this many coincidences surrounding one 'event' that didn't prove to be true later on. Gulf of Tonkin "coincidences" come to mind"

Would be an interesting thread if all those "coincidences" of all those different significant events were listed.

Was the patriot act also not convienently prepared so it could be prsented to the people not very long after 911? I was told it would take at least a certain amout of time to dream up such an act but it appeared too soon as if nobody would notice...or care.

originally posted by: BatSars

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: BatSars

It began WAY before 2019.

That document arose from prior sessions.

As per the link I provided in my previous post.

This is just their time to shine.

Yes, I saw the link and I appreciate you posting it here. The item you were responding to, though, was specific to that document and the timeline thereof.

I mean, it could all be a coincidence, but those coincidences sure do happen a lot these days. lol

At any rate, I appreciate the sharing of that document! It didn't go unnoticed and I even +1'd you twice!

That actually brings me to an ATS-specific question: I've noticed an ability to add another star when I refresh the page. Do those go away or can I give the same post multiple stars?

Appreciate it.

However, that link I provided you not only has all the related documents to your OP, but you can actually see the legislation and meetings that lead them there.

EU Law Search


Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2021 on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic (Text with EEA relevance)

You'll note they are always referencing "Global". Full coordination. Nefarious.

Yea, not sure how many stars you can give (I've only ever given 2), but it stops. Not sure what they're good for though? Can I trade for gas?

a reply to: BatSars

Online misinformation about vaccines isn't something that just popped up last year. It's been online since there was an online open to the general public.

Anti-vax leaflets have been around before that even.

It would strike me as very weird if the EU was ignorant of that.

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: BatSars

Online misinformation about vaccines isn't something that just popped up last year. It's been online since there was an online open to the general public.

Anti-vax leaflets have been around before that even.

It would strike me as very weird if the EU was ignorant of that.

"misinformation" -- tell that to the parents whose children suffered from vaccines being pumped into newborns and every year thereafter.

I don't think people talking about their experiences with vaccines should qualify as 'misinformation' nor should any articles written about those experiences either.

CDC fudged data, got caught, swept it under the rug.

a reply to: pthena

It’s amazing how it’s always misinformation that these programs are up against. Instead of the fact that they are trying to remove personal freedom.

a reply to: MykeNukem


"You'll note they are always referencing "Global". Full coordination. Nefarious."

So before the pandemic,the EU were co ordinating globally on ways to reduce vaccine hesistency.
Then while all this is being discussed,along comes the covid 19 pandemic.
Which many consider to be lab tweaked and released.
But oh look just a few months later and there are vaccines available which they have actually been working on for years.
Then you have the links to the Wuhan lab with Faucci/NIH/GoF research.
Then you have the great reset being discussed in public and on the MSM for a few weeks until they realised everyone sees it for what it is-borg enslavement and the enriching of the 1%-then they quit mentioning it on the MSM and anyone who does mention it is suddenly a conspiracy theorist.

Is all that together just circumstancial or a series of coincidences-or are they the fingerprints of a massive genocidal psy-op to force the world into an "Agenda 21"(gee look,another coincidence)future devoid of freedom and based around a technological global dictatorship complete with government forced medication of the masses and a social credit system just like china..

One coincidence is possible but when they stack up like they seem to be doing...what are the odds we are still looking at coincidences?
I would say almost zero.

This whole thing is an operation to destroy the notion of personal choice and freedom and to usher in a future of total control.